Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Evaluation between Administrative and Watershed Boundary in Carbon Sequestration Monitoring - Towards UN-REDD for Mt. Geum-gang of North Korea -

탄소 저장량 감시에서 배수구역과 행정구역의 비교 평가 - 금강산에 대한 UN-REDD 대응 차원에서 -

  • Kim, Jun-Woo (Department of Geography, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Um, Jung-Sup (Department of Geography, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2013.07.18
  • Accepted : 2013.09.06
  • Published : 2013.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

UN-REDD (United Nations programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) is currently being emerged as one of important mechanism to reduce carbon dioxide in relation to the deforestation. Although administrative boundary has already gained world-wide recognition as a typical method of monitoring unit in the process of GHG (Greenhouse Gas) reduction project, this approach did not provide a realistic evidence in the carbon sequestering monitoring in terms of UN-REDD; the meaningful comparison of land use patterns among watershed boundaries, interpretation for distribution trends of carbon density, calculation of opportunity cost, leakage management, etc. This research proposes a comparative evaluation framework in a more objective and quantitative way for carbon sequestering monitoring between administrative and watershed boundary approaches. Mt. Geumgang of North Korea was selected as a survey objective and an exhaustive and realistic comparison of carbon sequestration between the two approaches was conducted, based on change detection using TM satellite images. It was possible for drainage boundary approach to identify more detailed area-wide patterns of carbon distribution than traditional administrative one, such as estimations of state and trends, including historical trends, of land use / land cover and carbon density in the Mt. Geumgang. The distinctive changing trends in terms of carbon sequestration were specifically identified over the watershed boundary from 4.0% to 34.8% while less than 1% difference was observed in the administrative boundaries, which were resulting in almost 21-22%. It is anticipated that this research output could be used as a valuable reference to support more scientific and objective decision-making in introducing watershed boundary as carbon sequestering monitoring unit.

Keywords

References

  1. 국립공원관리공단, 2010, 북한산국립공원 자연자원 조사 보고서, 56p.
  2. 국립공원관리공단, 2011, 지리산국립공원 자연자원 조사 보고서, 77p.
  3. 권순덕, 서정호, 손영모, 박영규, 2005, 산지전용에 따른 우리나라의 임목바이오매스 탄소배출량, 산림바이오에너지, 24 (2), 10-15.
  4. 김갑덕, 김호민, 1991, Landsat TM 데이터와 지형 정보를 이용한 산림의 잠재 식생분석에 관한 연구, 임산 에너지, 11(1), 45-63.
  5. 김현섭, 배상원, 이상태, 황재홍, 2010, 광릉시험림내 느티나무(Zelkova serrata) 인공림의 생장특성 및 지상부 탄소저장량 분석, 한국임학회지, 99(1), 144-152.
  6. 박미선, 윤여창, 2012, 산림 탄소배출권 확보를 위한 REDD+ 사업 전략 개발, 환경정책, 20(2), 19-48.
  7. 박병욱, 1996, 수치위성자료를 이용한 광역의 토지 피복분류 기법. 한국측지학회지, 14(1), 39-47.
  8. 박종화, 유재심, 2009, 원격탐사를 이용한 북한의 산림황폐화 현황 조사, 환경논총, 48, 3-24.
  9. 박진우, 이정수, 2011, GIS와 행정 자료를 이용한 산림전용지의 공간분포 및 탄소배출량 분석-강원도 원주시를 대상으로, 한국임학회지, 100(3), 466-475.
  10. 박태진, 이우균, 정래선, 김문일, 권태협, 2011, REDD+ 모니터링 시스템 구축을 위한 원격 탐사기술의 활용방안, 한국 임학회지, 100(3), 315-326.
  11. 박현주, 신휴석, 노영희, 김경민, 박기호, 2012, 크리깅 기법을 이용한 단양군의 산림 탄소저장량 추정 -지상부 바이오매스를 대상으로, 한국지리정보학회지, 15(1), 16-33. https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2012.15.1.016
  12. 박홍철, 오충현, 2012, 한국의 산림전용 및 산림황폐화 방지를 통한 탄소배출감축 프로그램 이행의 기저선 접근법 연구, 한국환경생태학회지, 26(4), 484-497.
  13. 산림청, 2010, 교토의정서 대응 산림탄소계정 기반 구축 연구, 1-436.
  14. 산림청, 2011, 산림과 임업 동향에 관한 연차보고서, 1-730.
  15. 엄정섭, 2005, 도로밀도에 대한 소하천 유역 기반의 총량규제 기초자료 확보 방안, 환경영향 평가, 14(5), 317-335.
  16. 위광재, 이현, 이동하, 조재명, 서용철, 2011, 항공라이다 데이터를 이용한 산림의 탄소 흡수량 측정, 한국측량학회지, 29(1), 55-62.
  17. 유홍준, 1998, 금강산 , 학고재, 344p.
  18. 윤성탁, 김선오, 임상규, 2001, Landsat TM 영상 자료를 이용한 평택지역의 토지피복 현황 및 분류정확도 평가, 한국농림기상학회지, 3(3), 163-170.
  19. 이나연, 2012, 설악산국립공원 낙엽활엽수림의 탄소저장량 평가, Journal of National Park Research, 3(1), 9-13.
  20. 이상진, 최윤수, 윤하수, 2012, 항공 LiDAR 데이터를 이용한 산림의 이산화탄소 고정량 추정, 한국측량학회지, 30(3), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.7848/ksgpc.2012.30.3.259
  21. 이수경, 최현아, 손요환, 이우균, 2010, 산림전용 및 황폐화 방지를 통한 온실가스 감축방안 (REDD 및 plus) 논의동향 및 도입 전망, 에너지기후변화학회지 5(2), 85-98.
  22. 이정수, 신만용, 이우균, 조현국, 2012, 원격탐사자료를 이용한 온실가스 통계 모니터링 및 검증기술 개발, 산림청, 1-227.
  23. 임종환, 신준환, 진광제, 전정화, 오정수, 2003, 광릉 활엽수천연림의 산림식생구조, 입지환경 및 탄소저장량, 한국농림기상학회지, 5(2), 101-109.
  24. 전영률, 1998, 금강산 : 북한사람이 쓴 금강산의 모든 것, 실천문학사, 394p.
  25. 정경화, 조준행, 김찬규, 이경학, 윤여창, 노기안, 박규현, 왕광익, 진병복, 2008, 기후변화협약 대응 국가온실가스 IPCC 신규 가이드라 인 적용을 위한 기획연구: 총괄보고서, 에너지경제연구원.
  26. 조장환, 구자춘, 윤여창, 2011, 북한의 산림전용 방지수단으로의 REDD 사업의 경제적 타당성 분석, 한국임학회지, 100(4), 630-638.
  27. 차종환, 2000, 금강산 식물생태 현지답사여행, 예문당, 462p.
  28. 최진호, 엄정섭, 2012, 북한 지역 UN-REDD 등록 타당성 분석을 위한 위성영상 활용, 한국지형공간정보학회지, 20(4)
  29. 환경부, 2002, 인공위성 영상 자료를 이용한 토지 피복지도 구축 (용역보고서), 한국환경정책.평가연구원, 268p.
  30. 한국환경정책.평가연구원, 2010, 식생과 토양의 역할을 고려한 저탄소 토지이용계획 수립방안(II), 268p.
  31. American Carbon Registry, 2010, Methodology for REDD-avoiding planned deforestation
  32. ANSAB(Asia Network for Sustainable Agriculture and Bioresources), 2011, Forest Carbon Stock in Community Forests in three watersheds (Ludikhola, Kayarkhola and Charnawati), 1-41.
  33. FAO(Food and Agriculture Organization), 2010, Global forest resources assessment 2010, 376p.
  34. Gibbs, H.K., Brown S., Niles, J.O and Foley, J.A, 2007, Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: Making REDD a reality, Environmental Research Letter, 2(4), 23-45.
  35. Hoanga, M., Do, T., Pham, M., Noordwijk, M., Minang, P., 2013. Benefit distribution across scales to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) in Vietnam, Land Use Policy, 31, 48-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.013
  36. Huang, C., Goward, S., Schleeweis, K., Thomas, N., Masek, J., and Zhu, Z, 2009, Dynamics of national forest assessed using the Landsat record: Case studies in eastern Unites States, Remote sensing of Environment, 113(2), 1430-1442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.016
  37. ICIMOD(International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development), 2011, A Monitoring Report on Forest Carbon Stocks Changes in REDD Project Sites (Ludikhola, Kayarkhola and Charnawati), 1-35.
  38. IPCC, 2003, Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and foresty, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) for the IPCC.
  39. IPCC, 2006, Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC 2006).
  40. Kelty, M.J, 2006, The role of species mixtures in plantation forestry, Forest Ecology and Management, 233(2), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.011
  41. Lasco, R., Pulhin, F., Sales, R., 2007, Analysis of Leakage in Carbon Sequestration Projects in Forestry: A Case Study of Upper Magat Watershed, Philippines, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 12(6), 1189-1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-9059-0
  42. Levin N., Ben-Dor E. and Karnieli, A., 2004, Topographic information of sand dunes as extracted from shading effects using Landsat images, Remote Sensing of Environment, 90(2), 190-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.12.008
  43. Naidoo, R., Iwamura, T., 2007, Global-scale mapping of economics benefits from agricultural lands: Implications for conservation prioritles, Biological Conservation, 140, 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.025
  44. Peter, N., 2004, The use of remote sensing to support the application of multilateral environmental agreements, Space Policy, 20(3), 189-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2004.06.005
  45. NORAD(Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation), 2011, Real-Time Evaluation of Norway's International Climate and Forest Initiative: Contributions to National REDD+ Processes 2007-2010, Country Report: Indonesia, Evaluation Report 16/2010 Oslo, 144p.
  46. Rigina, O., Baklanov, A., Hagner, O., Olsson. H., 1999, Monitoring of forest damage in the Kola Peninsula, Northern Russia due to smelting industry, The Science of The Total Environment, 229(3), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00078-9
  47. Rosenqvist, A., Milne, A., Lucas, R., Imhoff, M., Dobson, C., 2003, A review of remote sensing technology in support of the Kyoto Protocol, Environmental Science & Policy, 6(5), 441-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00070-4
  48. Schueler, T., 1995, Environmental Land Planning Series: Site Planning for Urban Stream Protection. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, 232p.
  49. World bank Group, 2011, Estimating the opportunity costs of REDD+: A training manual, version 1.3, Washington D.C, 262p.

Cited by

  1. Exploring Sub-watershed suitable to UN-REDD/AR-CDM by Comparative Evaluation of Carbon Stock in Baekdu Mountain vol.22, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12672/ksis.2014.22.2.001