한국유기농업학회지 (Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture)

  • 제21권2호
  • /
  • Pages.271-282
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1229-3571(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-819X(eISSN)
한국유기농업학회 (Korean Association of Organic Agriculture)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국 중부지역에서 우분의 연용이 유기 벼의 생산성 및 유기 볏짚의 사료가치, 가축사육능력에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Continuous Use of Cow Manure on Productivity of Organic Rice and Feed Value, Stock Carrying Capacity of Organic Rice Straw in Central Region of Korea

  • 박상수 (일본 지바대학 원예학연구과) ;
  • 노진환 (연세대학교 과학기술대학 생명과학기술학부) ;
  • 이희충 (연세대학교 과학기술대학 생명과학기술학부) ;
  • 김윤중 (연세대학교 과학기술대학 생명과학기술학부) ;
  • 이주삼 (연세대학교 과학기술대학 생명과학기술학부)
  • 투고 : 2013.05.12
  • 심사 : 2013.06.13
  • 발행 : 2013.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 실험은 중부지방에서 벼 재배 시 유기 우분의 연용과 화학비료 시용이 유기 벼의 생산성, 볏짚의 사료가치 및 가축사육능력에 미치는 영향을 조사하였고, 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 유기 벼의 생초수량, 건물수량, 식물 1개체 당 낱알의 건물 중 및 개수는 1, 2년차에는 화학비료 시용구가 유의하게 높았으나(p<0.05), 3년차에는 각 시험구 간 유의차는 없었다. 또한 수확지수는 3년 모두 화학비료 시용구가 유의하게 높았으며(p<0.05), 해가 거듭할수록 각 시험구 간의 차이가 약간 줄어드는 경향을 보였다. 또한 단위면적당 가축사육능력은 $K_{CP}$와 $K_{TDN}$의 평균값으로 비교해 보았을 때, 화학비료 시용구가 높은 값을 보였고, 각 시험구 간의 차이는 점점 줄어드는 경향을 보였다. 특히 $K_{ME}$의 경우 3년차에 우분 시용구가 유의한 차이는 없었지만 높은 값을 보이기도 하였다. 이상의 결과로 볼 때 중부 지방에서 유기 벼 재배 시 우분을 연용 했을 경우, 처음 1, 2년은 화학비료를 시용했을 때 보다는 수량이 낮았지만 3년차부터는 화학비료를 시용했을 때와의 격차가 줄어들기 시작하였으며, 추후 우분을 연용한다면 그 격차는 더욱 줄어들 것으로 판단된다.

This experiments was conducted to investigate the influence on organic rice cultivation by continuous use of cow manure in the central region of Korea and investigated productivity of organic rice and feed value, stock carrying capacity of organic rice straw. In the results, application of chemical fertilizer showed higher one of 1st and 2nd year in fresh matter yield (15.77, 30.30ton/ha), dry matter yield (9.90, 13.89 ton/ha), dry matter yield of rice straw (4.88, 7.15ton/ha), dry matter weight of kernel per plant (29.81, 39.99g) and number of kernel per plant (1212.58, 1701units), but there were not significantly differences with each experimental plots in 3rd year. And harvest index showed higher one in application of chemical fertilizer (0.52, 0.48, 0.43) until 3 years. But their quantitative difference between application of chemical fertilizer and cow manure was gradually decreased each year. And the average value of $K_{CP}$ and $K_{TDN}$ showed higher one in application of chemical fertilizer (2.01, 2.94, 1.95 head/ha/yr) until 3 years. However, quantitative difference between chemical fertilizer and cow manure was gradually decreased each year. Especially, application of cow manure showed higher value of 3rd year in $K_{ME}$, but there was not significantly difference with each experimental plots. According to the results, continuous use of cow manure will be reduced their quantitative differences between chemical fertilizer as the year progress in the central region of Korea in terms of productivity of organic rice and feed value, stock carrying capacity of organic rice straw.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anon. 1973. Rondup(R) herbicids formulation of isopropylamine salt of glyphosate (Nphosphonomethglycine). Postmergence herbicide. Monsanto Agric. Div., St, Louis. Missouri. Tech. Bull. Mon0573-2-73.
  2. A.O.A.C. 1990. Official methods of analysis (15th Ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington D.C.
  3. Briggle, L. W. 1959. Growing Rye. USDA Farmers' Bull. No. 2146.
  4. Cho, H. S., K. W. Chang, C. G. Kim, J. H. Seo, and S. J. Kim. 2002. Marginal application time of pig manure before rice transplanting in paddy field. J. of KOWREC. 10(2): 59-64.
  5. Dilz, K., K. J. Postmus, and W. H. Prins. 1990. Residual effect of long term applications of farmyard manure to silage maize. Fertilizer Research. 26:249-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048763
  6. Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soet. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. USDA Agric. handbook No. 379, Washington, D.C.
  7. Holland. C., W. P. Kezar, E. J. Lazowski, W. C. Mahanna, and R. Reinhart. 1990. Pioneer forage manual : A Nutritional Guide, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. pp. 1-55.
  8. Jo, I. H. 2006. The effect of application of cattle slurry on dry matter yield and feed values of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) in uncultivated rice paddy. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture. 14(1): 69-83.
  9. Joop, H. A. and M Steenvoorden. 1989. Dairy manure management. Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service. Ithaca, New York 14853. NRAES-31.
  10. Lee, J. S. 2009. Studies on roughage production and their use enlargement. Korean Institute of Livestock Administration.
  11. Kim, J. H. and B. H. Lee. 2004. Current situation of rice industry and prospect for structural change. KREI. pp. 1-3.
  12. Lee, S. M., I. S. Ryu, C. S. Lee, Y. H. Park, and M. H. Um. 1999. Determination of application rate of composted pig manure for wetland rice. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 32(2): 182-191.
  13. Linn, J. and N. Martin. 1989. Forage quality tests and interpretation. Univ. of Minnesota Ext. Serv. AG-FO-2637.
  14. Loomis, R. S. and D. J. Connor. 1998. Crop ecology. p. 28.
  15. Lund, Z. F. and B. D. Doss. 1980. Residual effect of dairy cattle manure on plant growth and soil properties. Agronomy Journal. 72: 123-130. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1980.00021962007200010025x
  16. MAF (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry). 2006. Standard model development of naturecirculating organic agriculture.
  17. MAFR(Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs). 2012. Agricultural statistics
  18. Martin, J. H., W. H. Leonard, and D. L. Stamp. 1976. Principle of field crop production. Collier MacMillan Pub. London. Third ed.
  19. Meng, W. J., I. Choi, D. J. Kim, J. I. Kim, Y. D. Goh, M. B. Chang, K. H. Nahm, E. Lee, and S. Y. Jeong. 2005. Feed resources, Hyangmoon Pub. Co.
  20. NIAS (National Institute of Animal Science). 2007. Korean feeding standard (Cattle).
  21. Park, S. S. 2012. The cropping system establishment for organic roughage production and the nitrogen cycling in organic crop-livestock system. Master thesis, Yonsei University.
  22. Park, W. K., Y. S. Song, H. J. Jun, K. S. Jung, and K. S. Lee. 2008. Optimum application rate between livestock compost and chemical fertilizer for rice cultivation. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 41(0): 208-208.
  23. RDA (Rural Development Administration). 2010. Chemical analysis method of soil
  24. SAS. 2002. Statistical Analysis System ver. 9.2. SAS Institute INC., Cary, NC. USA.
  25. Seo, Y. H., A. S. Lee, B. O. Cho, A. S. Kang, B. C. Jeong, and Y. S. Jung. 2010. Adaptation study of rice cultivation in Gangwon province to climate change. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 12(2): 143-151. https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2010.12.2.143
  26. Shim, K. M., G. Y. Kim, K. A. Roh, H. C. Jeong, and D. B. Lee. 2008. Evaluation of agro-climatic indices under climate change. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 10(4): 113-120. https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2008.10.4.113
  27. Wolf, J. and H. Van Keulen. 1989. Modelling long-term crop response to fertilizer and soil nitrogen. II. Comparison with field result. Plant and soil. 120: 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02370287