Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Social Learning Values in the Justification Discourses for One Million-pyeong Park, Busan, South Korea

담론분석을 통한 100만평공원운동의 사회학습적 가치

  • Lee, Sungkyung (College of Environment and Design, The University of Georgia) ;
  • Kim, Seung-Hwan (Department of Landscape Architecture, Dong-A University)
  • 이성경 (조지아주립대학교 환경디자인학부) ;
  • 김승환 (동아대학교 조경학과)
  • Received : 2013.08.20
  • Accepted : 2013.10.08
  • Published : 2013.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper claims that the One Million-peyong Park(hereafter abbreviated as OMP) project is different from a typical citizen participatory park project by recognizing the exceptional leadership of the Civic Committee for the One Million-pyeong Park Construction(CCOMPC) in promoting and developing the OMP project. Since 2001 the CCOMPC has published a variety of written promotional materials to inform and educate the public about the project. In terms of approaching the promotional materials, this research focuses on the use of language on how the CCOMPC justifies the OMP project, namely the OMP justification discourse, and considers the discourse as a unique form of social document that represents the perspective of the CCOMPC in explaining the local environmental issues and values of urban parks to the public. Using a discourse analysis method, this research analyzes the justification discourses and investigates how they changed over the three main development phases of the OMP: the initiation and preliminary development phase(1999-2001.2), the development phase (2001.2-2008), and the time period after the greenbelt policy release on Dunchi Island(2008-present). In each discourse, the OMP project is rationalized as a citizen participation park project that (1) aims to enhance the quality of public green space in Busan, (2) is accompanied by various community engagement programs that emphasize the value of urban nature and environmental education to expand citizen participation, and (3) has contributed to the National Urban Park Bill. This research emphasizes the role of the discourses in helping the public gain a critical understanding about the local environment and values of urban parks. By analyzing the contents of the discourses, it explains the social learning values of the OMP expressed in the discourses.

본 연구는100만평공원운동의 시민참여, 홍보, 발전에 주도적인 역할을 한 100만평문화공원조성 범시민협의회의 리더십에 근거하여 100만평공원은 일반적인 시민참여형공원과 차별화되는 시민주도형공원이라 재조명한다. 100만평문화공원 조성 범시민협의회는 2001년 운동 초기부터 현재까지 일반 시민을 대상으로 각종 문서홍보물 출판하여 100만평공원운동, 시민참여, 도심공원의 가치와 필요성을 간접 교육하였다. 특히, 문서홍보물의 내용 중 100만평공원 조성의 정당성을 밝히기 위해 100만평문화공원조성 범시민협의회가 제시하는 공원조성 공략문은 부산내 공원자원의 현주소와 문제점을 지적하고, 도심공원의 필요성을 강조한 시민의 목소리가 담긴 사회적 문헌으로 고려하였다. 수집된 공략문은 담론분석(discourse analysis) 방법을 이용하여 담론의 변천과정을 100만평공원운동 태동기와 맹아기(1999~2001.2), 성장기(2001.2~2008), 100만평공원 대상지의 그린벨트 해제 이후(2008~현재) 세 개의 기점을 기준으로 분석하였다. 담론분석 결과, 각각의 담론에서 100만평공원운동은 1) 부산의 공공녹지 환경을 개선하기 위한 시민참여형 공원에서 2) 자연체험과 환경교육을 통한 시민참여확장형 공원 그리고 3) 전국적 민관 네트워크를 기반으로 한 국가공원운동의 순서로 발전하였다. 각각의 담론은 100만평 문화공원조성 범시민협의회가 부산의 공원자원의 문제점과 환경적 이슈를 지적하고 그 해결책으로 100만평공원을 제시 및 합리화하는 구조로 구성된다. 본 논문은 부산 시민들로 하여금 지역의 환경문제에 관한 비판적 이해를 돕고 도심공원의 가치를 간접 교육한 100만평공원 담론의 역할을 강조하고, 담론내용을 분석하여 구체적인 사회학습적 가치를 설명한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Arnstein, Sherry R.(1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35(4): 216-224.
  2. Collins, Kevin, and Ray Ison(2009) Jumping off Arnstein's ladder: Social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environmental Policy and Governance 19(6): 358-373. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.523
  3. Deming, Elen and Simon Swaffield(2011) Landscape Architecture Research: Inquiry, Strategy, Design. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  4. Hou, Jeffrey(2010a) Community DIYism: Neighborhood transformation through direct actions. The Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture.
  5. Hou, Jeffrey ed.(2010b) Insurgent Public Space: Guerrilla Urbanism and the Remaking of Contemporary Cities. New York: Routledge.
  6. Hou, Jeffrey, Julie M. Johnson, and Laura Lawson(2009) Greening Cities, Growing Communities. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
  7. Kim, Seung-hwan(2006) Citizen participation of the Million Amenity Park. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 22(6): 22-39.
  8. Kim, Seung-hwan, Chang-seok Han, and the 21st Century Landscape Group(2002) Case studies of pocket parks constructed through the partnership of a local community, administration, and educational institutions. Youngnam Landscape Forum. pp. 63-70.
  9. Kim, Yun-geum, Jong-sang Sung, Seok-man Cho, and Kyu-mok Lee (2003) Community participatory small park design. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 31(1): 78-89
  10. Paltridge, Brian(2006) Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
  11. The Civic Committee for One Million-pyeong Park Construction(2008) Natural Resource Conservation and Management Paln for Dunchi Island in the West Nakdong river.
  12. Tritter, Jonathan Quetzal, and Alison McCallum(2006) The snakes and ladders of user involvement: Moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy 76(2): 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.05.008
  13. Yang, Hong-mo(2011) Strategies and challenges for green infrastructure development. Landscape Review 11: 2-5.