1. Introduction
Single-phase squirrel-cage induction motor is one of the most widely used types of low power AC motors for residential households and commercial applications. Since the mostly installed motor volume into the field is the typical standard single-phase induction motor. In case of desirably variable speed, classical techniques such as mechanical or electrical equipments are utilized. These methods do not accomplish continuous speed control and energy saving viewpoint because the motor operates with constant voltage and constant frequency sources. Importance of energy saving issue and the decrease in the cost of the power electronic circuitry has substantially stimulated interest in the investigation of different singlephase motor drive topologies.
Variable speed control for single-phase induction motor (SPIM) with a single-phase drive has several serious problems especially at low speed such as low efficiency and average torque, great ripple torque and speed pulsation when compared with a two-phase drive [1-5]. The twophase drive system can be classified as inverter topologies in three types: two-leg, three-leg, and four-leg inverters. The two-leg inverter is the most favorite type of the drive system because control strategies for each motor winding can be designed independently [6-10]. However, the generated bipolar or two-level pulse width modulation (PWM) pattern of the two-leg drive has numerous harmonic voltages. The additional losses of the motor are taken placed. Motor efficiency is greatly reduced. The fourleg type is hardly concerned. Although the independent control with unipolar or three-level PWM pattern is given, more switching devices significantly provide more cost, higher switching and conduction losses, and also lower system reliability. Therefore, few researchers [11-13] use the three-leg inverter. Even though the quality of PWM scheme is nearly the four-leg type, a special modulation strategy is dramatically required. To disregard the difficulty in the modulation methodology, a symmetrical two-winding motor is considered [14]. However, the motor must be rewound or redesigned. The proper ways to attain the optimal motor performance, low-cost drive circuits, and appropriate inverter strategies may be the three-leg topology with an uncomplicated control technique.
In [13, 15], the unsymmetrical two-winding induction motor drive with unbalanced voltage control method have been presented as shown in Fig.1. Capacitors connected in series with an auxiliary winding are removed. VD1 and VQ1 are the fundamental output voltage of the auxiliary winding and the main winding, respectively. a is turns ratio of the auxiliary winding to the main winding. Since “a” of SPIM is normally depended on type and rated power of the motor. This voltage control method achieves the best motor performance for both starting and running status.
This paper presents a simplified modulation strategy for two-phase drive system using a three-leg voltage source inverter (VSI) feeding standard single-phase induction motors which are composed of unsymmetrical two stator windings. The proposed strategy offers completely unbalanced voltage control at a wide range of speed operation, and also no limitation of rotating direction of motor shaft. The results of three-leg VSI with the proposed strategy are compared with those of the conventional twoleg drive. Harmonic voltages content in case of voltage stress, loci current, acoustic noise, and motor efficiency are investigated. The experimental results clearly show that the proposed modulation strategy is better than the classical two-leg scheme in terms of DC bus voltage utilization, harmonic voltage content, and motor performance.
Fig. 1.The relationship between inverter frequency and fundamental output voltage for each winding
2. Conventional Two-leg Modulation Strategy
The main structure of PWM inverter fed unsymmetrical two-winding induction motor using the conventional twoleg inverter is shown in Fig. 2. The drive system consists of a single-phase voltage doubler circuit, two series filter capacitor, and two-leg of an IGBT pair. The one end of the main and auxiliary windings are joined to the two-leg inverter. The other ends are connected together with the center-tap of the filter capacitors. A capacitor for permanent split capacitor SPIM or two capacitors for the motor type of two-value capacitor SPIM must be removed. The fundamental voltage for both windings must be displaced with 90 electrical degree differences. The principle of generating PWM output voltages is based on a comparison between a reference sinusoidal and a common triangular wave, so called a sinusoidal pulsewidth modulation (SPWM). νa,2-leg and νb,2-leg are reference modulating functions of control signals on phase a and b, respectively, those functions for the two-leg system are as follows:
where Vm1 and Vm2 denote as the voltage amplitude.
Let Vdc is DC link voltage. Thus, the instantaneous fundamental output voltage of the auxiliary winding (νD1,2-leg) and that of the main winding (νQ1, 2-leg)are
From (2), it is obviously indicated that νD1,2-leg and νQ1, 2-leg can be individually adjusted by modulation index M1 and M2 , consecutively.
Fig. 2.Main power circuit and voltage vector of a conventional two-leg VSI
3. The Proposed Three-leg Modulation Strategy
The three-leg VSI is modification of the two-leg VSI by adding a leg of IGBT pair as well as inserting a modulating control signal. If each modulating function is
Where ν1 , ν2 , and ν3 are applied to leg1, leg2, and leg3 of the three-leg inverter, consecutively. All control signals have the same voltage amplitude Vm and contain 90 electrical degree phase shifting. These offer three configurations of winding placement and inverter connection which can be depicted as shown in Figs. 3 to 5. The appropriate wiring should be according to Fig. 4 because VD1 and VQ1 are orthogonal. Unfortunately, control signals in (3) cannot contribute to unbalanced voltage control. To overcome this problem, modification of the modulating function is required. Let
When d and q are constant values, therefore,
The control signals across the auxiliary winding (νab, 3-leg) and that across the main windings (νbc,3-leg) are
The fundamental output voltages of the auxiliary winding (νD1, 3-leg) and the main winding (νQ1, 3-leg) can be expressed as
Fig. 3.Stator winding connected together at A point
Fig. 4.Stator winding connected together at B point
Fig. 5.Stator winding connected together at C point
In (7), the fundamental output voltages of the auxiliary winding and of the main winding can be separately adjusted by d and q , respectively. It can be seen that there are two different parameters used for the voltage control which are similar to those of the two-leg drive as prior described in (2). However, the DC bus utilization equals to times of that used by the two-leg drive. The proposed modulating strategy is simple and makes achievement of unbalanced voltage control of the three-leg drive system. In case of reverse direction, νD1, 3-leg and νQ1, 3-leg can be switched. Voltage amplitude for each winding can be governed by q and d again. This method is found to be superior to [13] in terms of voltage control in case of reversible rotation. Since [13] has only the additional modulating function in phase C. The strategy according to [13] cannot maintain voltage boost with “a” times of the auxiliary winding when reverse direction is required.
Fig. 6.Phasor diagram of the modified modulating functions for unbalanced output voltages of three-level VSI
In order to better understand the proposed PWM modulation strategy, an authentic information of a tested motor such as the 220-V rated voltage, 50-Hz rated frequency, 1.7 turns ratio, and , was substituted in Fig. 1. The relationship between both winding voltages and fundamental frequency of inverter ( f ) can be rewritten as illustrated in Fig. 6. There are divided into three cases as follows:
It can be noticed that in case 1 there is no need of d and q . Case 2 uses only q to regulate voltage amplitude of the main winding. In the final case, both d and q are required to adjust the desired voltage amplitude. Voltage vectors of each case are strongly verified a success of the proposed modulation strategy for unbalanced voltage control method of the two-phase drive system using the three-leg VSI.
4. Results and Discussion
The performance of the proposed modulation strategy is verified by the experiment of which the simplified block diagram is illustrated in Fig. 7. A 370-W 2.56-Nm 220-V 2.66-A 1375-rpm 50-Hz 4-pole permanent split capacitor motor with turns ratio of 1.7 is used in the investigation. A running capacitor in series with the auxiliary winding is not necessary in the proposed circuit. In order to study the advantages of the proposed technique, the three-leg VSI is compared with the conventional two-phase drive. The motor is fed by two types of two-phase inverters constructed by 25-A 1200-V IGBT Intelligent Power Module power switching device. The inverter patterns are asynchronously natural-sampled PWM signals which are generated by comparing a triangular carrier wave with the sinusoidal reference modulating functions generated from a microcontroller. A 1000 W servo motor connected with the motor is served as a dynamic load. Motor shaft torques and speeds are measured by torque-speed sensor. Experimental results of motor input are recorded using the PZ4000 Power Harmonics Analyzer. Noise signals are detected by an installed microphone at a distance of 3 cm. from the motor. Acoustic noise spectra are extracted from the measured noise by using a spectrum analysis program. Fig. 8 shows a photograph of the experimental setup.
Fig. 7.Block diagram of experimental system
Fig. 8.Photograph of the experimental setup
The experimental results of PWM output voltages across motor windings at rated frequency of 50 Hz for the two-leg and three-leg VSIs are shown in Figs. 9 and 10, respectively. They are indicated that at the same dc bus voltage of 525 V and modulation index of 0.8 for both drive systems, the two-leg VSI provides 525-V two-level PWM output voltage across each winding while the threeleg VSI supplies 750-V three-level one. This confirms that, at the same dc bus voltage and modulation index, the threeleg drive provides higher output voltage about 1.4 times of that provided by the two-leg VSI.
Fig. 9.PWM output voltages for the two-leg VSI
Fig. 10.PWM output voltages for the three-leg VSI
To inspect the harmonic voltage contents and its effect on motor performance, especially in the complete voltage boost region, the sinusoidal reference frequency of 20 Hz and the compromise triangular carrier frequency of 5 kHz are selected. The fundamental peak voltage of the main winding is about 124.5 V while that of the auxiliary winding is approximately 211.5 V. The motor load is kept at rated torque. The harmonic voltage stress of the two-leg and three-leg VSIs are demonstrated in Figs. 11 and 12, consecutively. The figures show that the three-leg drive with the proposed modulating function offers the lower harmonic voltage stresses, particularly at the first harmonic voltage of carrier frequency or mf. Figs. 13 and 14 illustrate loci current of the two-leg, and three-leg VSIs. It can be seen that current hysteresis band of the two-leg inverter is greater than that of the 3-leg. Acoustic noise spectra with the two-leg and three-leg inverter fed the induction motor are depicted in Fig. 15. For low and medium motor speed, mechanical and aero-dynamical noises can practically be neglected [16-17]. Therefore, only electromagnetic noise is presented. It can be apparently seen that the noise components of the three-level PWM are mostly attenuated. Motor efficiencies for each inverter topologies are demonstrated in Table 1. It is obviously shown that motor efficiencies of the three-leg VSI are better than those of the two-leg VSI as a result of higher order harmonic current due to unipolar and bipolar PWM patterns of the three-leg and the two-leg VSIs. The average and ripple torques of the motor do not exist. Ordinarily, the average torques for both drives are identical because of the same fundamental output voltage. Harmonic voltages typically create only harmonic of ripple torque.
Fig. 11.Voltage stress of the two-leg VSI at 20-Hz frequency
Fig. 12.Voltage stress of the three-leg VSI at 20-Hz frequency
Fig. 13.Loci current for the two-legVSI
Fig. 14.Loci current for the three-leg VSI
Fig. 15.Acoustic noise with both drive systems at inverter frequency of 20 Hz
Table 1.Motor efficiency
5. Conclusion
This paper focuses on a simplified modulation strategy for a three-leg drive system fed typical single-phase induction motors. The proposed strategy requires only three reference voltage vectors which have the same amplitude and 90 electrical degree phase difference and the modified modulating function. This provides completely independent two-phase voltage control for both motor windings. With the modified modulating function, the reverse rotation at a wide range of speed operation can be achieved. The experimental results of the three-leg topology are compared with those of the traditional two-leg drive. The experimental results noticeably show that the three-leg drive offers dramatically lower harmonic voltages than the two-leg VSI. Consequently, the electromagnetic forces created in the motor are significantly minimized. The result of higher harmonic voltage order makes decrease of harmonic currents and also decline in the acoustic noise volume. The more reduction in harmonic current results in the higher motor efficiency.
References
- E.R. Collins Jr., H.B. Puttgen, W.E. Sayle II, "Single Phase Induction Motor Adjustable Speed Drive: Direct Phase Angle Control of The Auxiliary Winding Supply", in Proceedings of IEEE IAS-88 Conference, Pittsburgh, 1988, pp. 246-251.
- C-M. Young, C-C. Liu, and C-h. Liu, "New Inverter Driven Design and Control Method for Two Phase Induction Motor Drives," IEE Electric Power Applications, Vol. 143, No. 6, pp. 458-466, Nov.1996. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-epa:19960526
- Frede Blaabjerg, Florin Lungeanu, Kenneth Skaug, and Andreas Aupke, "Comparison of Variable Speed Drives for Single-Phase Induction Motors", in Proceedings of IEEE PCC-2002 Conference, 2002, pp. 1328-1333.
- Frede Blaabjerg, Florin Lungeanu, Kenneth Skaug, and Michael Tonnes, "Two Phase Induction Motor Drives : Low-Cost Topologies for TPIM Drives in Industrial Applications," IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, pp. 24-32, July 2004.
- Byoung-Yull Yang, and Byung-Il Kwon, "Characteristics of the Two-phase Induction Motor By the Inverter Fed Control" KIEE International Transactions on Electrical Machinery and Energy Conversion Systems, Vol. 5-B, No. 4, pp. 312-316, 2005.
- Michal PRAZENICA1, Branislav DOBRUCKY 1, Peter SEKERAK2, Lukas KALAMEN "Design, Modelling and Simulation of Two-Phase Two-stage Electronic System with Orthogonal Output for Supplying of Two-Phase ASM" Advances in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechatronics, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 56-63, March 2011.
- Mauricio Beltrao de Rossiter Correa, Cursino Brandao Jacobina, Edison Roberto Cabral da Silva, and Antonio Marcus Nogueira Lima, "Vector Control Strategies for Single-Phase Induction Motor Drive Systems," IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics, Vol. 51, No. 5, pp.1073-1080, Oct. 2004 https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2004.834973
- C. B. Jacobina, E. C. dos Santos Jr., M. B. R. Correa,and E. R. C. da Silva, "Reduced Switch Count AC-AC Two-Phase Drive Systems," in Proceedings of IEEE PESC 2005 Conference, June 2005.
- Do-Hyun Jang, and Jong-Soo Won, "Voltage, Frequency, and Phase-difference Angle Control of PWM Inverters-Fed Two-Phase Induction Motors," IEEE Trans. Power Electronics, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 377 - 383, July 1994. https://doi.org/10.1109/63.318895
- Naser M. B. Abdel-Rahim and Adel Shaltout, "An Unsymmetrical Two-Phase Induction Motor Drive With Slip-Frequency Control," IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, Vol. 24, No. 3, Sep. 2009, pp. 608-616. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2009.2026599
- D.G. Holmes and A. Kotsopoulos, "Variable Speed Control of Single and Two Phase Induction Motors Using a Three Phase Voltage Source Inverter", in Proc. IEEE IAS-93 Conf., 1991, pp. 613-620.
- Mauricio Beltrao de Rossiter Correa, Cursino Brandao Jacobina, Antonio Marcus Nogueira Lima, and Edison Roberto Cabral da Silva, "A Three-Leg Voltage Source Inverter for Two-Phase AC Motor Drive Systems" IEEE Trans. on Power Electronics, Vol. 17, No. 4, July 2002, pp. 517-523. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2002.800984
- S. Sinthusonthishat and V. Kinnares. "A New Modulation Strategy for Unbalanced Two Phase Induction Motor Drives Using a Three-Leg Voltage Source Inverter." IEE of Japan Trans. on Industry Applications, Vol. 125-D, No. 5, 2005.
- Do-Hyun Jang, "PWM Methods for Two Phase Inverters," IEEE Industry Applications Magazine, pp. 50-61, March 2007.
- J. Sinthusonthichat, R. Areehamad, V. Kinnares "Comparative Performance Evaluation of Two-Phase PWM Inverter Fed Induction Motor Drives With Various Topologies", in Proceedings of IEEE IPEC 2003 Conference, 2003.
- Stefan Laurentiu Capitaneanu, Bernard de Fornel, Maurice Fadel, and Fabrice Jadot, "On the acoustic noise radiated by PWM AC motor drives" Automatika, Vol. 44, No. 3-4, 137-145, 2003.
- Bertrand Cassoret, Rodolphe Corton, Daniel Roger, and Jean-Francois Brudny, "Magnetic Noise Reduction of Induction Machines," IEEE Trans. Power Electronics, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp.570-579, March 2003. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2003.809341
Cited by
- Model-Predictive Direct Power Control With Vector Preselection Technique for Highly Efficient Active Rectifiers vol.11, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2014.2363761
- Model Predictive Control Methods to Reduce Common-Mode Voltage for Three-Phase Voltage Source Inverters vol.30, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2014.2362762
- Equivalent Circuit Considering the Harmonics of Core Loss in the Squirrel-Cage Induction Motor for Electrical Power Steering Application vol.50, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2014.2329316