DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Long Term Outcomes of Aortic Root Replacement: 18 Years' Experience

  • Bang, Ji Hyun (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Im, Yu-Mi (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Joon Bum (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Choo, Suk Jung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Cheol Hyun (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jae Won (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Sung-Ho (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2012.08.07
  • Accepted : 2012.10.18
  • Published : 2013.04.05

Abstract

Background: We reviewed the long-term outcomes of aortic root replacement at Asan Medical Center and investigated the predictors affecting mortality. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 225 consecutive adult patients undergoing aortic root replacement with mechanical conduits (n=169), porcine aortic root prosthesis (n=23), or aortic homografts (n=33) from January 1992 to September 2009. The median follow-up duration was 6.1 years (range, 0 to 18.0 years). Results: The porcine root group was older than the other groups (freestyle $55.9{\pm}14.3$ years vs. mechanical $46.3{\pm}14.6$ years, homograft $48.1{\pm}14.7$ years; p=0.02). The mechanical group had the highest incidence of the Marfan syndrome (mechanical 22%, freestyle 4%, homograft 3%; p=0.01). Surgery performed for infective endocarditis was more frequent in the homograft group (mechanical 10%, freestyle 10%, homograft 40%; p<0.001). The overall 30-day mortality was 5.3% (12/225). Actuarial survival rates in the mechanical, porcine root, and homograft groups were 79.4%, 81.5%, and 83.5% at 5 years and 67%, 61.9%, and 61.1% at 10 years, respectively (p=0.73). By multivariate analysis, preoperative diabetes mellitus, older age, and longer cardiopulmonary bypass time were independent predictors of mortality. Incidence of postoperative complications, including infective endocarditis and thromboembolism were comparable in all of the groups. Conclusion: Aortic root replacement can be safely performed with different types of prostheses as the outcome was not affected by the choice of prosthesis. Further studies are required to assess the long-term durability of biological prostheses.

Keywords

References

  1. McCready RA, Pluth JR. Surgical treatment of ascending aortic aneurysms associated with aortic valve insufficiency. Ann Thorac Surg 1979;28:307-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(10)63127-X
  2. Crawford ES, Svensson LG, Coselli JS, Safi HJ, Hess KR. Surgical treatment of aneurysm and/or dissection of the ascending aorta, transverse aortic arch, and ascending aorta and transverse aortic arch: factors influencing survival in 717 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;98(5 Pt 1):659-73.
  3. Lewis CT, Cooley DA, Murphy MC, Talledo O, Vega D. Surgical repair of aortic root aneurysms in 280 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1992;53:38-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(92)90755-S
  4. Cohn LH, Rizzo RJ, Adams DH, et al. Reduced mortality and morbidity for ascending aortic aneurysm resection regardless of cause. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:463-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(96)00280-9
  5. Westaby S, Katsumata T, Vaccari G. Aortic root replacement with coronary button re-implantation: low risk and predictable outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:259-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(00)00347-X
  6. Kouchoukos NT, Wareing TH, Murphy SF, Perrillo JB. Sixteen-year experience with aortic root replacement: results of 172 operations. Ann Surg 1991;214:308-18. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199109000-00013
  7. Baumgartner WA, Cameron DE, Redmond JM, Greene PS, Gott VL. Operative management of Marfan syndrome: the Johns Hopkins experience. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1859-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00412-9
  8. Kaya A, Schepens MA, Morshuis WJ, Heijmen RH, Brutel de la Riviere A, Dossche KM. Valve-related events after aortic root replacement with cryopreserved aortic homografts. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:1491-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.11.026
  9. Byrne JG, Gudbjartsson T, Karavas AN, et al. Biological vs. mechanical aortic root replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:305-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00816-3
  10. Bloomfield P, Wheatley DJ, Prescott RJ, Miller HC. Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses. N Engl J Med 1991;324: 573-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199102283240901
  11. Sioris T, David TE, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, Feindel CM. Clinical outcomes after separate and composite replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:260-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.11.011
  12. Prasongsukarn K, Jamieson WR, Lichtenstein SV. Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses in age group 61-70 years. J Heart Valve Dis 2005;14:501-8, 510-1.
  13. Tyers GF, Jamieson WR, Munro AI, et al. Reoperation in biological and mechanical valve populations: fate of the reoperative patient. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60(2 Suppl): S464-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(95)00302-2
  14. Jamieson WR, Burr LH, Miyagishima RT, et al. Re-operation for bioprosthetic aortic structural failure: risk assessment. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;24:873-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(03)00566-9
  15. Jamieson WR, von Lipinski O, Miyagishima RT, et al. Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses assessed by composites of valve-related complications to 15 years after mitral valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:1301-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.09.042
  16. Gott VL, Cameron DE, Alejo DE, et al. Aortic root replacement in 271 Marfan patients: a 24-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:438-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03336-7
  17. Kirklin JK, Smith D, Novick W, et al. Long-term function of cryopreserved aortic homografts: a ten-year study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:154-65.
  18. Takkenberg JJ, Eijkemans MJ, van Herwerden LA, et al. Prognosis after aortic root replacement with cryopreserved allografts in adults. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:1482-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04722-7