DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Efficacy of the Maze Procedure for Atrial Fibrillation Associated with Atrial Septal Defect

  • Shim, Hunbo (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yang, Ji-Hyuk (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Pyo-Won (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jeong, Dong Seop (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jun, Tae-Gook (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2012.08.13
  • Accepted : 2012.10.17
  • Published : 2013.04.05

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication in elderly patients with atrial septal defect (ASD). The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of the maze procedure in these patients. Materials and Methods: Between February 2000 and May 2011, 46 patients underwent the maze procedure as a concomitant operation with ASD closure. Three patients who underwent a right-sided maze were excluded, and one patient was lost to follow-up. The mean follow-up duration was $3.2{\pm}2.5$ years. Electrocardiography was performed 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery, and checked annually after that. Results: AF persisted in 4 patients after surgery. One year after surgery, among 38 patients, 55.3% remained in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs. However, when including the patients who took antiarrhythmic drugs, 92.1% were in sinus rhythm. Freedom from AF recurrence at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 5 years after surgery were $97.4{\pm}2.6$, $94.4{\pm}3.8$, $91.2{\pm}4.9$, $87.8{\pm}5.8$, $79.5{\pm}7.6$, and $68.2{\pm}12.4$, respectively. There was no early mortality after operation. Conclusion: Concomitant treatment with the maze procedure and ASD closure is safe and effective for restoring the sinus rhythm.

Keywords

References

  1. Murphy JG, Gersh BJ, McGoon MD, et al. Long-term outcome after surgical repair of isolated atrial septal defect. Follow-up at 27 to 32 years. N Engl J Med 1990;323: 1645-50. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199012133232401
  2. Berger F, Vogel M, Kramer A, et al. Incidence of atrial flutter/ fibrillation in adults with atrial septal defect before and after surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:75-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00478-6
  3. Kobayashi J, Yamamoto F, Nakano K, Sasako Y, Kitamura S, Kosakai Y. Maze procedure for atrial fibrillation associated with atrial septal defect. Circulation 1998;98(19 Suppl):II399-402.
  4. Perloff JK. Surgical closure of atrial septal defect in adults. N Engl J Med 1995;333:513-4. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199508243330809
  5. Brandenburg RO Jr, Holmes DR Jr, Brandenburg RO, McGoon DC. Clinical follow-up study of paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after operative repair of a secundum type atrial septal defect in adults. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:273-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(83)80048-4
  6. Gatzoulis MA, Freeman MA, Siu SC, Webb GD, Harris L. Atrial arrhythmia after surgical closure of atrial septal defects in adults. N Engl J Med 1999;340:839-46. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199903183401103
  7. Cox JL, Boineau JP, Schuessler RB, Kater KM, Lappas DG. Five-year experience with the maze procedure for atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:814-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(93)90338-I
  8. Cox JL, Ad N, Palazzo T, et al. Current status of the Maze procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;12:15-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-0679(00)70011-6
  9. Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med 1998;339:659-66. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199809033391003
  10. Moe GK, Rheinboldt WC, Abildskov JA. A computer model of atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J 1964;67:200-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(64)90371-0
  11. Cox JL, Boineau JP, Schuessler RB, Jaquiss RD, Lappas DG. Modification of the maze procedure for atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation: I. rationale and surgical results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:473-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70244-X
  12. Cox JL, Jaquiss RD, Schuessler RB, Boineau JP. Modification of the maze procedure for atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation: II. surgical technique of the maze III procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:485-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70245-8
  13. Nattel S, Burstein B, Dobrev D. Atrial remodeling and atrial fibrillation: mechanisms and implications. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2008;1:62-73. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.107.754564
  14. de Vos CB, Pisters R, Nieuwlaat R, et al. Progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation clinical correlates and prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:725-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.040
  15. de Groot NM, Houben RP, Smeets JL, et al. Electropathological substrate of longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with structural heart disease: epicardial breakthrough. Circulation 2010;122:1674-82. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.910901
  16. Sun H, Chartier D, Leblanc N, Nattel S. Intracellular calcium changes and tachycardia-induced contractile dysfunction in canine atrial myocytes. Cardiovasc Res 2001;49:751-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6363(00)00294-7
  17. Nattel S, Maguy A, Le Bouter S, Yeh YH. Arrhythmogenic ion-channel remodeling in the heart: heart failure, myocardial infarction, and atrial fibrillation. Physiol Rev 2007; 87:425-56. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00014.2006
  18. Nattel S. New ideas about atrial fibrillation 50 years on. Nature 2002;415:219-26. https://doi.org/10.1038/415219a
  19. Allessie M, Ausma J, Schotten U. Electrical, contractile and structural remodeling during atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res 2002;54:230-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6363(02)00258-4
  20. Wang W, Buehler D, Martland AM, Feng XD, Wang YJ. Left atrial wall tension directly affects the restoration of sinus rhythm after Maze procedure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;40:77-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.10.022

Cited by

  1. Surgical correction of atrial septal defect in the elderly vol.11, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2014.47338
  2. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS vol.50, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezw313
  3. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS vol.37, pp.38, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210
  4. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS vol.18, pp.11, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw295
  5. Guía ESC 2020 sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la fibrilación auricular, desarrollada en colaboración de la European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) vol.74, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2020.10.022
  6. 2021 Korean Heart Rhythm Society Guidelines: Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Specific Clinical Settings vol.96, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3904/kjm.2021.96.4.264
  7. 2020 Clinical guidelines for Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter vol.26, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4594