The Group Differences with or without Depressive Symptom-Related Difficulty

우울 증상과 관련된 어려움 유무에 따른 집단 차이

  • Lee, Hye-Kyung (Health Service Center, Kongju National University) ;
  • Kim, Jun Won (Department of Psychiatry, Gongju National Hospital) ;
  • Song, Yul-Mai (Neuropsychiatry Research Laboratory, Gongju National Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Kounseok (Department of Psychiatry, Gongju National Hospital)
  • 이혜경 (국립공주대학교 보건진료소) ;
  • 김준원 (국립공주병원 정신건강의학과) ;
  • 송열매 (국립공주병원 뇌기능연구소) ;
  • 이건석 (국립공주병원 정신건강의학과)
  • Received : 2013.02.05
  • Accepted : 2013.03.07
  • Published : 2013.05.31

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine the differences according to depressive symptom-related difficulty status. Methods 2828 participants were a divided into depressive symptom-related difficulty group (difficult group, n = 774), and a non-depressive symptom-related difficulty group (not difficult group, n = 2054). The psychological character of the participants were assessed using the Korean version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), and Conner-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Statistical analyses were done using t-test, chi-square, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Results Compared with the no difficulty group, the difficulty group reported significantly higher score in all items of PHQ-9. The score of "feeling tired" was the highest and the score of "suicidal ideation" is the lowest in both groups. ANCOVA analysis that is adjusted with the total score of PHQ-9 showed the differences in SWLS, GHQ-12, and CD-RISC scores between the difficulty group and the no difficulty group. Conclusions The findings suggest that there are different characters on PHQ-9, SWLS, GHQ-12, and CD-RISC according to depressive symptom-related difficulty. Therefore, it is required not only to evaluate depressive symptoms in patients with depression, but also the depressive symptom-related difficulty to understand these differences.

Keywords

References

  1. Sartorius N. The economic and social burden of depression. J Clin Psychiatry 2001;62 Suppl 15:8-11. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.v62n0103
  2. Woolf SH, Battista RN, Angerson G, Logan A, Eel W. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Exam. Ottawa: Canada Communication Group;1994.
  3. Turner R. Quality of life: experience with sertraline. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1994;9 Suppl 3:27-31.
  4. Mathers CD, Bernard C, Iburg KM, Inoue M, Ma Fat D, Shibuya K, et al. Global burden of disease in 2002: data sources, methods and results. Geneva: World Health Organization;2003.
  5. Park JH, Yoon SJ, Lee HY, Cho HS, Lee JY, Eun SJ, et al. [Estimating the burden of psychiatric disorder in Korea]. J Prev Med Public Health 2006;39:39-45.
  6. Association ACH. American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment: Reference group data report: Fall 2005. Baltimore, MD: American College Health Association;2006.
  7. Furr SR, Westefeld JS, McConnell GN, Jenkins JM. Suicide and depression among college students: a decade later. Prof Psychol Res Pr 2001;32:97. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.32.1.97
  8. Paik JW, Song JY. Special editions: depression in the college student. J Kyung Hee Univ Med Cent 2009;25:1-6.
  9. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606-613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
  10. Park SJ, Choi HR, Choi JH, Kim K, Hong JP. Reliability and validity of the Korean Version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Anxiety and Mood 2010;6:119-124.
  11. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess 1985;49:71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
  12. Lim N, Lee H, Suh EM. Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) findings in Korea. Kor J Psychol: Gen 2010;29:21-47.
  13. Kim JH. The Relationship between Life Satisfaction/Life Satisfaction Expectancy and Stress/Well-Being: An Application of Motivational States Theory. Korean J Health Psychology 2007;12: 325-345. https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2007.12.2.003
  14. Goldberg DP, Hillier VF. A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med 1979;9:139-145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700021644
  15. Park JI, Kim YJ, Cho MJ. Factor structure of the 12-Item General Health Questionnaire in the Korean general adult population. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2012;51:178-184. https://doi.org/10.4306/jknpa.2012.51.4.178
  16. Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety 2003;18:76-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113
  17. Baek HS, Lee KU, Joo EJ, Lee MY, Choi KS. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. Psychiatry Investig 2010;7:109-115. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2010.7.2.109
  18. Kessler RC. Epidemiology of women and depression. J Affect Disord 2003;74:5-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00426-3
  19. Frank E, Carpenter LL, Kupfer DJ. Sex differences in recurrent depression: are there any that are significant? Am J Psychiatry 1988;145: 41-45. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.145.1.41
  20. Young MA, Scheftner WA, Fawcett J, Klerman GL. Gender differences in the clinical features of unipolar major depressive disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis 1990;178:200-203. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199003000-00008
  21. Kim KS, Lee KU, Na YM, Kang BJ, Kim YK, Bahk WM, et al. The Symptom Profiles of Korean Patients with Major Depressive Disorder. J of Kor Soc for Dep and Bip Disorders 2004;2:230-236.
  22. Berlim MT, Pargendler J, Brenner J, Fleck MP. Significant improvement in the quality of life of Brazilian depressed outpatients 12 weeks following the start of antidepressants. Psychiatry Res 2007;153:253- 259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2006.07.006