The Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The application of embodied turtle schemes for the task of the spatial visualization

공간 시각화 과제에 체화된 거북 스킴 적용에 관한 연구

  • 이지윤 (서울대학교 수학교육과 대학원) ;
  • 조한혁 (서울대학교 수학교육과) ;
  • 송민호 (숙명여자대학교 교육대학원)
  • Received : 2012.10.09
  • Accepted : 2013.05.10
  • Published : 2013.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The theory of embodied cognition assumes that behaviors, senses and cognitions are closely connected, and there is a growing interest in investigating the significance of embodied cognition in the field of mathematics education. This study aims to applicate the embodied turtle metaphor and expressions when students visualize three-dimensional objects. We used MRT(Verdenberg & Kuse, 1978) & SVT for this research and both tests turned out that turtle schemes are useful to the students in a low level group. In addition, students found turtle schemes more useful in SVT which requires constructing three-dimensional objects, than in MRT which requires just rotating the image of three-dimensional objects in their mind. These results suggest that providing students who are less capable of spatial visualizing with the embodied schemes like turtle metaphor and expressions can be an alternative to improve their spatial visualization ability.

Keywords

References

  1. 김연식, 우정호, 박영배, 박교식 (2001). 수학교육학 용어 해설(9), 학교수학 3 (2), 475-499.(Kim Y.S., Woo J.H., ParkY.B.& Park K.S. (2001). The mathematics pedagogy terminology set, Journal of Korea Society Educational Studies in Mathematics School Mathematics 3(2), 475-499.)
  2. Abelson, H. & diSessa, A. (1980). Turtle Geometry. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
  3. Amorim, M. A., Isableu, B. & Jarraya , M. (2006). Embodied Spatial Transformations: "Body Analogy" for the Mental Rotation of Objects, Journal of Experimental Psychology 135(3), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.3.327
  4. Botzer, G. & Yerushalmy, M. (2008). Embodied Semiotic Activities and Their Role in the Construction of Mathematical Meaning of Motion Graphs, International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 13, 111-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-008-9133-7
  5. Cho H.H., Song M.H., Lee J.Y. & Kim H.K. (2011). On the Design of Logo-based Educational Micro-world Environment, Research in Mathematical Education 15(1), 15-30.
  6. Clements, D. H., Battista, M. T., Sarama, J. & Swaminathan, S. (1996). Development of Turn and Turn Measurement Concepts in a Computer-based Instructional Unit, Educational Studies in Mathematics 30, 313-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00570828
  7. Dreyfus, T. (1993). Didactic Design of Computer-based Learning Environments. In Keitel, C. & Ruthven, K. (Eds.), Learning from Computers: Mathematics Education and Technology, NATO ASI Series 121, 101-130. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  8. Gonzalez, E. G. & Kolers, P. A. (1982). Mental Manipulations of Arithemetic Symbols, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 8(4), 308-319. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.8.4.308
  9. Hew, K. F. & Cheung, W. S. (2010). Use of Three-dimensional (3-D) Immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: A review of the research, British Journal of Educational Technology 41(1), 33-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00900.x
  10. Hoyles, C. & Noss, R. (2003). "What can digital technologies take from and bring to research in mathematics education?" In Bishop, A.J., Clements, M.A., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., Leung, F.K.S. (eds.), Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education (323-349). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  11. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, T. P. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  12. Kynigos, C. & Latsi, M. (2007). Turtle's navigation and manipulation of geometrical figures constructed by variable processes in a 3d simulated space, EuroLogo 2007.
  13. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
  14. Lakoff, G. & Núñez, R. (1997). The metaphorical structure of mathematics: Sketching out cognitive foundations for a mind-based mathematics. In L. English (Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  15. Lakoff, G. & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings into being. New York: Basic Books.
  16. Lee J.Y., Cho H.H., Song M.H. & Kim H.K. (2011). Representation Systems of Building Blocks in Logo-based Microworld, Research in Mathematical Education 15(1), n.1, 1-14.
  17. Morgan, C. & Alshwaikh, J. (2008). Imag(in)ing three-dimensional movement with gesture : 'playingturtle' orpointing? Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics 28(3).
  18. Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine. New York: Addison-Wesley.
  19. Nunez, R. (2007). The cognitive science of mathematics: Why is it relevant for mathematics education? In: R. A. Lesh, E. Hamilton & J. Kaput (Eds.), Foundations for the future in mathematics education. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  20. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Perseus Publishing.
  21. Presmeg, N. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics, In Angel Gutierrez and Paolo Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: past, present and future.
  22. Radford, L., Bardini, C., Sabena, C., Diallo, P., & Simbagoye, A. (2005). On embodiment, artifacts, and signs: a semiotic-cultural perspective on mathematical thinking. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the PME 4, 113-120. Malbourne: PME.
  23. Ramadas, J. (2009). Visual and spatial modes in science learning, International Journal of Science Education 31(3), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802595763
  24. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects, Science 171, 701-703. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3972.701
  25. Steinbring, H. (2006). What makes a sign a mathematical sign? An epistemological perspective on mathematical interaction. Educational Studies in Mathematics 61(12), 133-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-5892-z
  26. Stidff, M. (2007). Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science, Learning and Instruction 17, 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.012
  27. Thurstone, L. L. (1944). A factorial study of perception. Chicago, IL：University of Chicago Press.
  28. Verdenberg, S. & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations: A group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills 47, 599-604. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
  29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  30. Wang, H. C., Chang, C. Y. & Li, T. Y. (2007). The comparative efficacy of 2D-versus 3D-based media design for influencing spatial visualization skills. Computers in Human Behavior 23, 1943-1957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.004