DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Hospital-based Study of Endometrial Cancer Survival in Mumbai, India

  • Balasubramaniam, Ganesh (Department of Cancer Registry, Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Tata Memorial Hospital) ;
  • Sushama, S. (Department of Cancer Registry, Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Tata Memorial Hospital) ;
  • Rasika, B. (Department of Cancer Registry, Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Tata Memorial Hospital) ;
  • Mahantshetty, U. (Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital)
  • Published : 2013.02.28

Abstract

Background: Endometrial cancer is common in western women, and the rates are very high; however in India, the rates are as low as 4.3 per 100,000 (Delhi). Objective: To estimate the survival of endometrial cancer patients based on age, education, family history, tobacco habit, number of pregnancies, clinical extent of disease and treatment received. Materials and Methods: The present retrospective study was carried out at the Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Mumbai, India, between 1999-2002. 310 cases treated in TMH were considered as eligible entrants for the study. Five-year survival rates were estimated using actuarial and loss-adjusted (LAR) methods. Results: The proportions of patients dying above 50 years of age, non-residents and illiterates was higher than their counterparts. 54.8% of patients had some form of treatment before attending TMH. There were only 4.2% tobacco-chewers and only 6.1% had a family history of cancer. There were 25.8% who had 3-5 pregnancies (not living children) and 38.1% did not remember the pregnancy history. The 5-year overall survival rate was 92%. The five-year rates indicated better prognosis for those aged less than 50 years (97%), non-tobacco-chewers (94%), with no family history of cancer (93%), with localized disease (93%) and those treated with surgery either alone or as a combination treatment (95%). Conclusions: The present study showed that endometrial cancer patients with localized disease at diagnosis have a good outcome in India. A detailed study will help in understanding the prognostic indicators for survival especially with the newer treatment technologies now available.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrektsen G, Heuch I, Wik E, Salvesen HB (2009). Parity and time interval since childbirth influence survival in endometrial cancer patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 19, 665-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a3e1bf
  2. Barrena Medel NI, Herzog TJ, et al (2011). Comparison of the prognostic significance of uterine factors and nodal status for endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 204, 248.
  3. Berkson J, Gage RP (1950). Calculation of survival rates for cancer. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clinic, 25, 270-86.
  4. Bertelsen K, Ortoft G, Hansen ES (2011). Survival of danish patients with endometrial cancer in the intermediate-risk group not given postoperative radiotherapy: the Danish endometrial cancer study (DEMCA). Int J Gynecol Cancer, 21, 1191-9.
  5. Bratos K, Roszak A, Cikowska-Wo?niak E, Niecewicz P (2002). Analysis of epidemiologic risk factors for endometrial cancer. Ginekol Pol, 73, 945-50.
  6. Chen T, Jansen L, Gondos A, et al (2012). Survival of endometrial cancer patients in Germany in the early 21st century: a period analysis by age, histology, and stage. BMC Cancer, 12, 128. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-128
  7. Chia VM, Newcomb PA, Trentham-Dietz A, Hampton JM (2007). Obesity, diabetes, and other factors in relation to survival after endometrial cancer diagnosis. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 17, 441-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00790.x
  8. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al (2008). GLOBOCAN 2008, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010.
  9. Ganesh B (1995). Effect of lost to follow-up in estimating survival rates. ACTA Universitatis, Ser A, Vol. 440,Tampere, Finland, (Ph.D. Thesis,1995).
  10. Ganesh B, Rajaraman S, Aleyamma M, Rengaswamy S, Matti H (2011). Loss adjusted hospital and population based survival of cancer patients. IARC Monograph Eds : Sankaranarayanan R., Swaminathan R., Lucas E. Cancer survival in Africa, Asia, the Caribbean and Central America (SurvCan). IARC Scientific Publications volume 162, ISBN 978-92-832-2162-3, Lyon, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2011.
  11. Gottwald L, Chalubinska J, Moszynska-Zielinska M, et al (2012). Endometrioid endometrial cancer--the prognostic value of selected clinical and pathological parameters. Ginekol Pol, 82, 743-8.
  12. NCRP (National Cancer Registry Programme). Two-year Report of the Population Based Cancer Registries- 2004-2005. NCRP, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bangalore, 2007.
  13. Papanas N, Giatromanolaki A, Galazios G, Maltezos E, Sivridis E (2006). Endometrial carcinoma and diabetes revisited. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 27, 505-8.
  14. Tangjitgamol S, Manusirivithaya S, Srijaipracharoen S, et al. Endometrial cancer in Thai women: clinico-pathological presentation and survival. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 11, 1267-72.
  15. Trovik J, Mauland KK, Werner HM, et al (2012). Improved survival related to changes in endometrial cancer treatment, a 30-year population based perspective. Gynecol Oncol, 125, 381-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.01.050

Cited by

  1. Accuracy of Intraoperative Gross Examination of Myometrial Invasion in Stage I-II Endometrial Cancer vol.15, pp.17, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.17.7061
  2. Hospital-Based Study of Epithelial Malignancies of Endometrial Cancer Frequency in Lahore, Pakistan, and Common Diagnostic Pitfalls vol.2014, pp.2042-003X, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/179384
  3. Prospective Nonrandomized Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgical Staging for Endometrial Cancer in India pp.0976-6952, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-017-0633-6
  4. Life table estimator revisited pp.1532-415X, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2017.1335418
  5. Role of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Preoperative Assessment of Carcinoma Endometrium—a Retrospective Analysis pp.0976-6952, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-018-0826-7