Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society

Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Kinetic Study on Ethylaminolysis of Phenyl Y-Substituted-Phenyl Carbonates: Effect of Leaving-Group Substituents on Reactivity and Reaction Mechanism

  • Song, Yoon-Ju (Department of Chemistry, Duksung Women's University) ;
  • Kim, Min-Young (Department of Chemistry and Nano Science, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Um, Ik-Hwan (Department of Chemistry and Nano Science, Ewha Womans University)
  • Received : 2013.03.11
  • Accepted : 2013.03.21
  • Published : 2013.06.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A kinetic study on nucleophilic substitution reactions of phenyl Y-substituted-phenyl carbonates (5a-5j) with ethylamine in 80 mol % $H_2O$/20 mol % DMSO at $25.0{\pm}0.1^{\circ}C$ is reported. The plots of $k_{obsd}$ vs. [amine] are linear for the reactions of substrates possessing a strong electron-withdrawing group (EWG) but curve upward for those of substrates bearing a weak EWG, indicating that the electronic nature of the substituent Y in the leaving group governs the reaction mechanism. The reactions have been concluded to proceed through a stepwise mechanism with one or two intermediates (a zwitterionic tetrahedral intermediate $T^{\pm}$ and its deprotonated form $T^-$) depending on the nature of the substituent Y. Analysis of Bronsted-type plots and dissection of $k_{obsd}$ into microscopic rate constants have revealed that the reactions of substrates possessing a strong EWG (e.g., 5a-5f) proceed through $T^{\pm}$ with its formation being the rate-determining step, while those of substrates bearing a weak EWG (e.g., 5g-5j) proceed through $T^{\pm}$ and $T^-$.

Keywords

References

  1. Castro, E. A. Pure Appl. Chem. 2009, 81, 685-696. https://doi.org/10.1351/PAC-CON-08-08-11
  2. Castro, E. A. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 3505-3524. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr990001d
  3. Jencks, W. P. Chem. Rev. 1985, 85, 511-527. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00070a001
  4. Jencks, W. P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1981, 10, 345-375. https://doi.org/10.1039/cs9811000345
  5. Jencks, W. P. Acc. Chem. Res. 1980, 13, 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar50150a001
  6. Castro, E. A.; Millan, D.; Snatos, J. G. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2012, 25, 989-993. https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.2988
  7. Castro, E. A.; Gazitua, M.; Santos, J. G. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2011, 24, 466-473. https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.1787
  8. Castro, E. A.; Aliaga, M. E.; Cepeda, M.; Santos, J. G. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2011, 43, 353-358. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20562
  9. Castro, E. A.; Aliaga, M.; Campodonico, P. R.; Cepeda, M.; Contreras. R.; Santos, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 9173-9179. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo902005y
  10. Castro, E. A.; Ramos, M.; Santos, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 6374-6377. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo901137f
  11. Castro, E. A.; Aliaga, M.; Santos, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 2679-2685. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo047742l
  12. Menger, F. M.; Smith, J. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 3824- 3829. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00766a027
  13. Maude, A. B.; Williams, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1997, 179-183.
  14. Maude, A. B.; Williams, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1995, 691-696.
  15. Menger, F. M.; Brian, J.; Azov, V. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2581-2584. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20020715)41:14<2581::AID-ANIE2581>3.0.CO;2-#
  16. Perreux, L.; Loupy, A.; Delmotte, M. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 2185-2189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(03)00151-0
  17. Fife, T. H.; Chauffe, L. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3579-3586. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo9906835
  18. Spillane, W. J.; Brack, C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1998, 2381-2384.
  19. Llinas, A.; Page, M. I. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 651-654. https://doi.org/10.1039/b313900j
  20. Sung, D. D.; Jang, H. M.; Jung, D. I.; Lee, I. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2008, 21, 1014-1019. https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.1418
  21. Sung, D. D.; Koo, I. S.; Yang, K.; Lee, I. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 432, 426-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2006.11.002
  22. Sung, D. D.; Koo, I. S.; Yang, K.; Lee, I. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 426, 280-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2006.06.015
  23. Oh, H. K.; Oh, J. Y.; Sung, D. D.; Lee, I. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 5624-5629. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo050606b
  24. Oh, H. K.; Jin, Y. C.; Sung, D. D.; Lee, I. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 1240-1244. https://doi.org/10.1039/b500251f
  25. Oh, H. K. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2012, 33, 2427-2430. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2012.33.7.2427
  26. Oh, H. K. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2011, 32, 4095-4098. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2011.32.11.4095
  27. Oh, H. K. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2011, 32, 1539-1542. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2011.32.5.1539
  28. Oh, H. K. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2011, 32, 137-140. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2011.32.1.137
  29. Oh, H. K.; Ku, M. H.; Lee, H. W.; Lee, I. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 8995-8998. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo0264269
  30. Um, I. H.; Lee, J. Y.; Ko, S. H.; Bae, S. K. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5800-5803. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo0606958
  31. Um, I. H.; Kim, K. H.; Park, H. R.; Fujio, M.; Tsuno, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3937-3942. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo049694a
  32. Um, I. H.; Min, J. S.; Ahn, J. A.; Hahn, H. J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 5659-5663. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo000482x
  33. Um, I. H.; Hwang, S. J.; Baek, M. H.; Park, E. J. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 9191-9197. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo061682x
  34. Um, I. H.; Seok, J. A.; Kim, H. T.; Bae, S. K. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7742-7746. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo034637n
  35. Um, I. H.; Lee, S. E.; Kwon, H. J. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 8999-9005. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo0259360
  36. Um, I. H.; Han, J. Y.; Shin, Y. H. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3073-3078. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo900219t
  37. Um, I. H.; Akhtar, K.; Shin, Y. H.; Han, J. Y. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3823-3829. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo070171n
  38. Um, I. H.; Shin, Y. H.; Han, J. Y.; Mishima, M. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7715-7720. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo061308x
  39. Um, I. H.; Jeon, S. E.; Seok, J. A. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 1237- 1243. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200500647
  40. Um, I. H.; Bae, A. R. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 5781-5787. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo300961y
  41. Um, I. H.; Kim, E. Y.; Park, H. R.; Jeon, S. E. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 2302-2306. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo052417z
  42. Um, I. H.; Yoon, S. R.; Park, H. R.; Han, H. J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 1618-1624. https://doi.org/10.1039/b801422a
  43. Castro, E. A.; Angel, M.; Arellano, D.; Santos, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 6571-6575. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo0101252

Cited by

  1. Leaving-Group Substituent Controls Reactivity and Reaction Mechanism in Aminolysis of Phenyl Y-Substituted-Phenyl Carbonates vol.34, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2013.34.7.2023
  2. Kinetic Study on Nucleophilic Displacement Reactions of Phenyl Y-Substituted Phenyl Carbonates with 1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene: Effects of Amine Nature on Reaction Mechanism vol.37, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/bkcs.10627
  3. -Y-substituted-Phenyl Thionocarbonates with 1,8-Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene in Acetonitrile vol.38, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/bkcs.11242