Communications of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparisons positive psychology experience of high school students using PPE-M

PPE-M을 이용한 고등학생들의 긍정심리체험 비교

  • Received : 2013.01.01
  • Accepted : 2013.05.15
  • Published : 2013.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study dealt with the measurements of the positive psychological experience of high school students in relation to mathematics learning by using PPE-M. The purpose of this study is to compare the positive psychology of the high school students based on the grade and gender variables. Measured data for the purpose of this study examined the difference between the gifted students and the general students through a t-test. In addition, differences were analyzed by grade and gender variables. And One-way ANOVA was conducted to see the difference according to the course variables. The difference between the two groups was meaningful in PPE-M total score. There was meaningful difference in all of 5 areas and 19 factors except for 4 factors (Insight, Honesty, Full with pride, and Achievement). However, there was no difference according to grade levels. The comparison between the gender in the ordinary students shows meaningful difference in 11 factors, not in 12 (Judgment, Insight, Honesty, Prudence, Modesty & Kindness, Gratitude & Happiness, Flow, Superiority feeling, Achievement, High pleasure, Full with pride, and Self-efficacy). Affiliation makes meaningful difference in 22 factors except for Honesty.

본 연구는 수학 학습 관련 긍정적 심리체험 검사지인 PPE-M을 사용하여 측정한 고등학생들의 긍정심리를 집단별로 비교하는데 그 목적이 있다. 본 연구의 목적을 위하여 측정된 자료를 t검증을 통하여 영재학생과 일반학생들 사이의 차이를 살펴보았으며, 또한 학년 및 성별 변인에 따른 차이도 분석하였다. 그리고 계열 변인에 따른 차이를 살펴보기 위해서 일원변량분석(One-way ANOVA)을 실시하였다. 그 결과, PPE-M의 총점에 대하여 영재학생과 일반학생들 간의 유의미한 차이가 있었고, 통찰 정직 뿌듯함 성취감의 4가지 요소를 제외한 나머지 19개의 요소 및 5개의 영역에서도 두 집단 간의 유의미한 차이가 나타났다. 그러나 학년 간의 유의미한 차이는 없었으며, 일반계학생들의 성별에 대한 비교에서는 판단력, 통찰, 정직, 신중함, 배려, 감사와 행복, 몰입, 우월감, 성취감, 쾌감, 뿌듯함, 자기효능감의 12개의 요소를 제외한 나머지 11개의 요소에서는 유의미한 차이가 있었다. 계열에 따른 비교에서는 정직을 제외한 22개의 요소에서 유의미한 차이가 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 박선화, 김명화, 주미경 (2010). 수학에 대한 정의적 특성 향상 방안 연구, 연구보고 RRI 2010-9. 서울: 한국교육과정평가원.
  2. 홍진곤, 김태국(2012). 수학 학습과 관련한 고등학생들의 긍정심리 분석 및 측정도구 개발, 수학교육학연구, 22(1), 69-99.
  3. Brush, L. R. (1978). A validation study of the mathematics anxiety rating scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 485-491. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447803800236
  4. Compton, W. C. (2005). An Introduction to Positive Psychology. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth. 서은국.성민선.김진주(역) (2007). 긍정심리학 입문, 서울: 박학사.
  5. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & O'Sullivan, M. (1988). Smiles when lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychol, 54, 414-420. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.3.414
  6. Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290-309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
  7. Fredrickson, B. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300-319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300
  8. Fredrickson, B. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
  9. Fredrickson, B. (2002). Positive emotions. In C. Snyder & S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
  10. Herzberg, F. et al. (1959). The Motivation to Work. N. Y.: John Wiley & Sons. 김영식, 주삼환(공역) (1983). 동기․위생이론. 서울: 배영사.
  11. Peterson, C. (2000). The future of optimism. American Psychologist, 55(1), 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.44
  12. Peterson, C., & Steen, T. A. (2002). Optimistic explanatory style. In C. P. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology(pp. 244-256). New York: Oxford University Press.
  13. Samuel, W. D. (1983). Mathematics achievement and attitude in grades six through eight in lebanon. Oregon: Bragham Young University.
  14. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. New York: Mulpure Publishing, Inc. 김인자(역) (2006). 마틴 셀리 그만의 긍정심리학. 경기 안양: 물푸레.
  15. Tyler, R. W. (1973). Assessing educational achievement in the affective domain. Measurement in Education, 4(3), 1-8.
  16. Wigfield, A., & Meece, J. (1988). Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students, Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), (pp.210-216). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.210