한국안광학회지 (Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society)

한국안광학회 (The Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

근거리에서 수직주시시차와 입체시와의 관계

A Correlation Between Vertical Fixation Disparity and Stereopsis at Near

  • 윤민화 (동강대학교 안경광학과)
  • 투고 : 2013.07.30
  • 심사 : 2013.09.14
  • 발행 : 2013.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 수직주시시차의 유형별 분포를 분석하고 입체시와의 상관관계를 알아보고자 한다. 방법: 입체시 검사표는 부분적으로 random dot을 이용하는 RANDOT(R) stereotest를 사용하였다. 근거리에서 수직주시시차는 환자와의 거리를 25 cm 유지한 상태에서 Wesson fixation disparity card를 이용해, 한쪽 눈에 하나씩 보이는 두 개의 가는 선이 프리즘을 가입하여 한 줄로 일치될 때의 측정결과를 바탕으로 주시시차곡선을 6가지 유형으로 분류하였다. 결과: 43명을 대상으로 근거리 수직주시시차 곡선의 유형은 제 1유형이 55.82%로 가장 많이 분포하였고, 제 2유형이 23.25%로 가장 적게 분포하였으며, 제 3유형이 4.65%, 제 4유형은 4.65%, 제 5유형은 6.98%, 제 6유형은 4.65%로 분포하였다. 두 변수들 사이의 선형적 상관관계의 정도를 보는 상관분석의 결과를 보면 입체시는 수직주시시차를 나타내는 Y-intercept(r = -0.07), 일부융합제거시 사위량(r = -0.03), 완전융합제거시 사위량(r = -0.00)과 상관관계가 없는 것으로 나타났고, 통계적으로 유의하지 않았다(p>0.05). 수직주시시차 곡선의 기울기와는 r = 0.36으로 양의 상관관계를 가지며 그 관계는 낮은 편으로 통계적으로 유의하였다(p<0.05). 수직주시시차를 나타내는 Y-intercept는 일부융합 제거시 사위량(r = 0.89)과는 높은 상관관계를 보였으며 통계적으로 유의하였다(p<0.05). 수직주시시차 곡선의 기울기는 r = -0.33으로 음의 상관관계를 보였고, 그 관계는 낮았으며 통계적으로 유의하게 나타났다(p<0.05). 회귀분석(regresson analysis)결과, 입체시와 수직주시시차의 변화에 따른 관계는 수직주시시차가 1분( ' ) 변하면 입체시는 7.631초( ' ) 만큼 변화하며, 입체시가 1초( ' ) 변하면 수직주시시차는 0.017분( ' ) 만큼 변화하였고 통계적으로 유의하였다(p<0.05). 결론: 입체시와 수직주시시차는 낮은 상관관계를 보였으며, 수직주시시차 만으로 입체시를 판단하기 힘들며 입체시에 영향을 미치는 인자는 수직주시시차 이외의 다른 요인이 더 클 것으로 사료된다.

Purpose: To investigate a correlation between vertical fixation disparity and stereopsis by analyzing distribution of types of vertical fixation disparity. Methods: In this study, RANDOT(R) stereotest partly using random dot was used in stereopsis tests. The vertical fixation disparity in close proximity categorized fixation disparity slope into six types on the basis of the result of measurement in when two thin lines, one for one eye looks, become overlapped as a line by adding into prism with Wesson fixation disparity card while maintaining a distance of 25 cm from patients. Results: In the types of near vertical fixation disparity curve, targeting 43 people, the first type 55.82% was the most distributed, the second type is the least 23.25%, the third type of 4.65%, the fourth type of 4.65%, the fifth type of 6.98%, the sixths types of 4.65% were distributed. The result of a correlation analysis, which shows the degree of linear correlation between two variables, represented that stereopsis is not correlated with Y-intercept (r = -0.07) which show vertical fixation disparity, associated phoria (r = -0.03) and dissociated phoria (r = -0.00), but it was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Fixation disparity slope of vertical fixation disparity (r = 0.36) was shown to have a positive correlation with stereopsis. It has a low positive correlation and a meaningful statistics (p<0.05). The Y-intercept which indicates vertical fixation disparity was also not associated with stereopsis (r = -0.07) and dissociated phoria (r = -0.03), and this was not statistically significant (p>0.05), while it had a high correlation as well as a statistically significant with associated phoria (r = 0.89). There was a negative correlation between Y-intercept and fixation disparity slope of vertical fixation disparity (r = -0.33). It showed a low relationship but statistically valuable (p>0.05). As a result of regression analysis, the stereopsis was changed as 7.631" if vertical fixation disparity changes 1' and the vertical fixation disparity changed as 0.017' if stereopsis changes 1', and the change was statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusions: The study shows that there is a low correlation between stereopsis and vertical fixation disparity, and it is difficult to determine stereopsis only using vertical fixation disparity. Therefore, it suggests other factors above vertical fixation disparity have greater influence on stereopsis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim DN. Binocular vision, 1st Ed. Seoul: Shinkwang pub, 2010;240.
  2. Ogle KN. Researches in binocular vision. 1st Ed. New York: Hafner, 1965;69-93.
  3. Park HJ. Analysis of binocular vision by Wesson fixation disparity card. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2007;12(1):53-59.
  4. Sucher DF, Stewart J. Vertical fixation disparity in learning disabled. Optom Vis Sci Dec. 1993;70(12):1038-1043. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199312000-00008
  5. Luu CD, Green JF, Abel L. Vertical fixation disparity curve and the effects of vergence training in a normal young adult population. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77(12):663-669. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200012000-00013
  6. Tychsen L. Binocular vision. In; Moses RA et al. Adler's physiology of the eye, 9th Ed. St Louis Mosby, 1992;773- 810.
  7. Romano PE, Romano JA, Puklin JE. Stereoacuity development in children with normal binocular single vision. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975;79(6):966-971. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(75)90679-0
  8. Griffen JR. Binocular Anomalies, Procedures for vision therapy, 2nd Ed. Chicago: Professional Press, 1982;415.
  9. Hasse HJ. Zur fixations disparation, 2nd Ed. Heidelberg: Verlag der deutschen optikerzeitung, 2000;215-223.
  10. Saladin JJ. Effects of heterophoria on stereopsis. Optom Vis Sci. 1995;72(7):487-492. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199507000-00008
  11. Sung PJ. Optometry, 2nd Ed. Seoul: Daihakseolim, 2002; 226-228, 230, 237, 252.
  12. Jin YH. Strabismus, 1st Ed. Ulsan: UUP, 1997;67-75.
  13. Ogle KN, Martens TG, Dyer JA. Oculomotor imbalance in binocular vision and fixation disparity, 1st ed. Philadelphia: Lea&Febiger, 1967;75-119.
  14. Bae HJ, Yun MO, Kim JY, Song SJ, Kim JS, Eom JH, et al. The study of near fixation disparity by wesson fixation disparity card. Korean J Vis Sci. 2012;14(1):56-62.
  15. Pickwell LD, Gilchrist JM, Hesler J. Comparison of associated heterophoria measurements using the mallett test for near vision and the sheedy disparometer. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1988;8(1):19-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.1988.tb01077.x
  16. Simons K. Stereoacuity norms in young children. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99(3):439-445. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1981.03930010441010
  17. Tychsen L. Binocular vision, In : William MH ed. Adler's physiology of the eye, 9th Ed. St Louis: Mosby 1992;773- 853.
  18. Von Noorden GK. Binocular vision and ocular motility, 5th ed. St Louis: Mosby, 1996;8-40.
  19. Yoon DH, Lee SU, Choi O. Ophthalmology, 2nd Ed. Seoul: Ilchokak, 1991;205.
  20. Parks MM. Monofixation syndrome. In : Tasman W. Duane's clinical ophthalmology, 1st Ed. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott comp, 1991;1-12.
  21. Parks MM. Binocular vision. In : Tasman W. Duane's clinical ophthalmology, 1st Ed. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott comp, 1991;1-14.
  22. Parks MM. Stereoacuity as an indicator of bifixation. In : Strabismus symposium, 1st Ed. New York: S Karger, 1968; 258-260.
  23. Ing MR. Early surgical alignment for congenital esotropia. Ophthalmology. 1983;90(2):132-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(83)34586-3
  24. Park HJ, Yoon Y. The study of vertical fixation disparity by fixation disparity card. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2010; 15(1):61-66.
  25. Jimnez JR, Olivares JL, Prez-Ocn F, del Barco LJ. Associated phoria in relation to stereopsis with random-dot stereograms. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77(1):47-50.
  26. Saladin JJ. Stereopsis from a performance perspective. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82(3):186-205. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.OPX.0000156320.71949.9D
  27. Shin HS, Lee SH, Yun MO, Kim MY, Bae HS, Park SC. Relationship between the degree of exophoria and stereoacuity. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2009;14(2):41-46.
  28. Ogle KN. Researches in binocular vision, 1st Ed. New York: Hafner, 1964.
  29. Sung PJ. Optometry, 6th ed. Seoul: Daihak publishing company, 2008;247-253.
  30. Jenkins TC, Abd-Manan F, Pardhan S. Fixation disparity and near visual acuity. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1995;15(1): 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.1995.9592793.x
  31. Leske DA, Holmes JM. Maximum angle of horizontal strabismus consistent with true stereopsis. J AAPOS 2004;8(1):28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2003.08.010
  32. Ukwade MT, Bedell HE, Harwerth RS. Stereopsis is perturbed by vergence error. Vision Res 2003;43(2):181-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00408-X
  33. Elliott DB. Clinical procedures in primary eye care, 3rd ed. New York: Butterworth Heinemann, 2007;201-206.
  34. Min BM, Park WC. The Relationship between visual acuity and titmus stereoacuity. J Korean Oph Soc. 1987; 28(6):1339-1342.
  35. Kwon MJ, Byun JW, Jeon IC, Mah KC. The Effect on srereopsis by induced deviation during prism adaptation. Korean J Vis Sci. 2009;11(3):187-201.
  36. North RV, Henson DB, Smith TJ. Influence of proximal, accommodative and disparity stimuli upon the vergence system. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 1993;13(3):239-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.1993.tb00465.x