DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Movement and Deposition Characteristics of Debris Flow According to Rheological Factors

유동학적 인자에 따른 토석류의 이동 및 퇴적 특성

  • Lee, Mi-Ji (Dept. of Ocean Engrg., Pukyong National Univ.) ;
  • Kim, Yun-Tae (Dept. of Ocean Engrg., Pukyong National Univ.)
  • Received : 2013.01.04
  • Accepted : 2013.05.21
  • Published : 2013.05.31

Abstract

Most of the landslides induced by rainfall in summer rainy season appear in the type of debris flow. Debris flow gives a lot of economic losses and human casualties due to high moving velocity and volume of debris flow. In order to analyze movement and deposition characteristics of debris flow, numerical analysis using FLO-2D program was conducted with various viscosities and yield stresses. As a result of numerical analysis, velocity and runout distance of debris flow decreased as its viscosity increased due to resisting force between particles of debris flow. Consequently, flow depth of debris flow increased and impact force decreased. Yield stress of debris flow affected its initiation and deposition characteristics. As yield stress increased, runout distance of debris flow decreased and its impact force increased. Based on the results of numerical analysis, it was found that velocity of debris flow mainly depended on viscosity, while deposition characteristics (runout distance, deposition width, deposition area) of debris flow depended on both viscosity and yield stress.

여름철 강우로 인한 산사태는 대부분 토석류의 형태로 나타난다. 토석류는 빠른 이동속도와 체적 때문에 경제적 손실 뿐만 아니라 많은 인명피해를 일으킨다. 토석류 해석 프로그램인 FLO-2D를 사용하여 유동학적 인자인 점성과 항복응력에 따른 토석류의 이동과 퇴적 특성을 분석하였다. 수치해석을 수행한 결과, 점성이 증가할수록 토석류 입자간의 응집력이 증가하여 토석류의 퇴적거리와 속도가 감소한다. 그에 따라 유동심은 증가하고 충격력은 감소하였다. 항복응력은 토석류의 발생과 퇴적에 큰 영향을 미치는 요인이다. 항복응력이 증가할수록 충격력은 증가하였다. 수치 해석 결과에 의하면, 토석류의 이동속도는 주로 점성에 의존하나 토석류의 퇴적 특성(퇴적거리, 퇴적 폭, 퇴적면적)은 점성과 항복응력에 의존한다.

Keywords

References

  1. D. Rickenmann, D. Laigle, B.W. McArdell, and J. Hübl (2006), "Comparison of 2D debris-flow simulation models with field events", Computational Geosciences, 10:241-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-005-9021-3
  2. FLO-2D Software Inc., (2004), FLO-2D user's manual.
  3. Imran, J., Harff, P., and Parker, G. (2001), "A numerical model of submarine debris flow with graphical user interface", computers & geosciences, Vol.27, No.6, pp.717-729. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(00)00124-2
  4. Iverson, R.M., Ried, M.E., and LaHusen, R.G. (1997), "Debris-Flow Mobilization From Landslides", Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Vol. 25:85-138. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.25.1.85
  5. Iverson, R.M. (2003), "The debris-flow rheology myth", In Debris- Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment (ed. Rickenmann & R. C. Chen), pp.303-314. Millpress, Rotterdam.
  6. Jeong, Sueng-Won (2010), "Flow characteristics of landslides/debris flows: sediment rheology and mobility and mobility of landslides", Proceedings of Korean Society of Engineering Geology (KSEG) Conference 2010, KSEG, pp.79-80.
  7. Jeong, Sueng-Won (2011), "Rheological Models for Describing Fine-laden Debris Flows: Grain-size Effect", Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol.27, No.6, pp.49-61. https://doi.org/10.7843/kgs.2011.27.6.049
  8. Kang, Hyo-Sub and Kim, Yun-Tae (2012), "Effect of Fines on Rheological Characteristics of Soil", KGS Fall National Conference 2012 October 11-12, 2012/Seoul/Korea, 1171-1178
  9. Kim, Sang-Kyu and Seo, Heung-Seok (1997a), "An Analysis of Debris Flow Movement Using Rheological Model", Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society (KGS), Vol.13, No.5, p133-143.
  10. Kim, Sang-Kyu and Seo, Heung-Seok (1997b), "Rheological Characteristics of Debris Flows", Journal of Korean Geotechnical Society (KGS), Vol.13, No.5, p125-131.
  11. O'Brien, J.S. and Julien, P.Y. (1988), "Laboratory Analysis of Mud flow Properties", Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol.114, No.8, pp.877-887. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1988)114:8(877)
  12. O'Brien, J.S. and Julien, P.Y. (1985), "Physical Properties and mechanics of hyper-concentrated sediment flows", Proceedings of the Specialty Conference on Delineation of Landslide, Flash Flood and Debris Flow Hazard in Utah, Utah State University, Utah, pp.260-279.
  13. O'Brien, J.S. and Julien P.Y. (1988), "Laboratory analysis of mudflow properties", J. of Hyd. Eng, ASCE, 114(8), 877-887. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1988)114:8(877)
  14. O'Brien, J.S, Julien, P.Y., and Fullerton, W.T. (1993), "Twodimensional water flood and mudflow simulation", J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 119(2), pp.244-261. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:2(244)
  15. Oh, KyungDoo (2011), "Lesson of Umyeon Mountain", Seoul monthly technology magazine column, 2011, September.
  16. Paik, JoongCheol and Kim, YoungIl (2011), "Runout characteristics of debris flow in Umyeon Mountain" River and Road in Mountain Area, Vol.4, 15-19.

Cited by

  1. Rheological Characteristics of Fine-Grained Soil with Sand Content vol.33, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.5.1897
  2. Physical Vulnerability Function of Buildings Impacted by Debris Flow vol.14, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2014.14.5.133
  3. 토석류 유동해석을 위한 유한요소 수식화 vol.30, pp.10, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7843/kgs.2014.30.10.55
  4. Numerical Simulation of Debris Flow Behavior at Mt. Umyeon using the DAN3D Model vol.19, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9798/kosham.2019.19.3.195
  5. FLO-2D를 활용한 경사지 형상에 따른 토석류 흐름양상에 대한 수치모의 vol.13, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.21729/ksds.2020.13.3.45
  6. Predicting the Initiation Area of a Debris Flow Using Geomorphological Characteristics and a Physically-Based Model vol.21, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9798/kosham.2021.21.2.137