한국축산식품학회지 (Food Science of Animal Resources)

  • 제33권2호
  • /
  • Pages.244-250
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 2636-0772(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2636-0780(eISSN)
한국축산식품학회 (Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

인젝션과 텀블링 염지촉진처리에 따른 염지우육의 품질에 미치는 영향

Effects of Injection and Tumbling Methods on the Meat Properties of Marinated Beef

  • 투고 : 2012.10.21
  • 심사 : 2013.02.28
  • 발행 : 2013.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 염지촉진 방법인 인젝션 및 텀블링 처리에 따른 한우 우둔 염지육의 품질에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 처리구는 인젝션과 텀블링 단일 처리구 및 복합처리구로 텀블링 처리구의 경우 진공과 비진공으로 나누었으며 대조구는 6시간 침지하였다. pH는 5.26-5.51의 범위로 인젝션 후 텀블링 처리구가 5.51로 가장 높았고 텀블링 단일 처리구에서 5.26으로 가장 낮았으며 인젝션 및 텀블링 복합처리구에서 높은 경향을 나타내어(p<0.05) 보수력 증진에 가장 큰 영향을 미치는 것으로 판단되었다. 염도와 당도 측정결과 pH가 높게 측정된 인젝션 및 텀블링 복합처리구에서 높은 경향을 나타내어 염지 촉진효과가 가장 우수한 것으로 나타났다. 가열감량은 대조구에서 22.08%로 가장 많았으나 인젝션 후 텀블링 진공 처리구와 비진공 처리구 및 텀블링 진공처리구간의 유의적인 차이를 보이지 않았으며 인젝션 처리구는 13.98%로 유의적으로 가장 적게 나타났다. 조직감 측정 결과 hardness는 8.01-13.99 kg의 범위로 인젝션 후 진공텀블링 처리구가 가장 낮았으며 대조구에서 가장 높게 나타났다(p<0.05). 그러나 인젝션 후 진공 및 비진공 텀블링 처리구가 텀블링 진공 및 비진공 처리구보다 낮았지만 유의적인 차이를 나타내지 않았다. 또한 인젝션 처리구의 경우 단일 텀블링 진공 및 비진공 처리구와 비교할 때 텀블링과 인젝션 처리는 연도향상에 유사한 영향을 주는 것으로 보이며 단일 텀블링 진공과 비진공 처리구 및 인젝션 후 진공 및 비진공 텀블링 복합 처리구의 결과로 볼 때 진공과 비진공의 차이 또한 없는 것으로 판단되었다. 색도는 염지 및 가공방법에 따른 가열 전후의 뚜렷한 경향을 보이지 않았다. 관능평가 결과 모든 항목에서 인젝션 및 텀블링 공정으로 제조한 처리구가 대조구에 비해 유의적으로 높게 평가되었으며 연도정도, 조직감의 기호도 및 맛의 영향으로 종합적인 기호도에서 인젝션 후 비진공 텀블링 복합 처리구가 가장 높은 기호도를 나타내었다. 따라서 본 연구결과 인젝션 및 텀블링 공정은 육의 가공에 있어 가열수율, 연도 및 관능적 기호도 향상에 긍정적인 영향을 주는 것으로 사료되었다.

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of marinade condition (injection and tumbling process) on the physicochemical and sensory characteristics of marinade steak. The pH of marinade steaks was in the range of 5.26-5.51, with the highest level in the injection/tumbling (IT) treatment, while injection processes tended to result in higher pH levels (p<0.05). Salinity and sweetness contents were determined to be the highest in the IT treatment. Cooking loss was highest in the control (Immersion, 6 hr), but there were no significant differences between control and injection/tumbling, injection/ vacuum/tumbling (IVT), and vacuum/tumbling treatments. Hardness was in the range of 8.01-13.99 kg, with the lowest level observed for the IVT treatment, and the highest level observed for the control. However, there were no significant differences in hardness between injection process treatments and non-injection process treatments. Therefore, injection and tumbling processes have a similar effect on meat tenderness. In the sensory evaluation, there was a significant difference between the control, injection and tumbling process treatments in terms of tenderness, texture preference and taste. These results suggest that injection and tumbling processes improved tenderness, product yield and sensory preference in meat products.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Addis, P. B. and Shanus, E. S. (1979) Massaging and tumbling in the manufacturer of meat product. Food Technol. 33, 36-40.
  2. Boksch, W. (1965) Warmpokelm vin kasseler und bacon. Fleischwirtshaft 45, 921-922.
  3. Barbut, S., Maurer, A. J., and Lindsay, R. C. (1988) Effects of reduced sodium chloride and added phosphates on physical and sensory properties of turkey frankfurters. J. Food Sci. 53, 62-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb10178.x
  4. Boleman, S. J., Boleman, S. L., Miller, R. K., Taylor, J. R., Cross, H. R., Wheeler, T. L., Koohmaraie, M., Shackelford, Sss. D., Miller, M. R., West, R. L., Johnson, D. D., and Savell, J. W. (1997) Consumer evaluation of beef of known categories of tenderness. J. Anim. Sci. 75, 1521-1524.
  5. Boles, J. A. and Shand, P. J. (2001) Meat cut and injection level affects the tenderness and cook yield of processed roast beef. Meat Sci. 59, 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00078-X
  6. Boulianne, M. and King, A. J. (1995) Biochemical and color characteristics of skinless boneless pale chicken breast. Poult. Sci. 74, 1693-1697. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0741693
  7. Choi, D. W., Shin, H. H., and Choi, H. T. (1997) Study on dewatering and impregnation soaking process. Korean J. Food Nutr. 10, 462-467.
  8. Choi, J. H., Jung, J. Y., Choi, J. H., Lee, M. A., Lee, E. S., Kim, H. Y., Han, D. S., Kim, J. M., and Kim, C. J. (2006) Effects of immersion period after tumbling processing on the quality properties of boiled pork loin with soy sauce. Korean J. Food Cookery Sci. 22, 379-385.
  9. Dzudie, T. and Okubanjo, A. (1999) Effects of rigor state and tumbling time on quality of goat hams. J. Food Eng. 42, 103-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(99)00097-7
  10. Fennema, O. R. (1985) Water and ice. In: Food Chemistry. Fennema, O. R. (ed.) Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp. 23-68.
  11. Freixenet, L. (1994) Spray injection of meat. Influence of the brine pressure in the quality of the injected products. A Hus. 4, 27-32.
  12. Ghavimi, B., Rogers, R. W., Althen, T. G., and Ammerman, G. R. (1986) Effects of nonvacuum, and nitrogen back-flushed tumbling on various characteristics of restructured cured beef. J. Food Sci. 51, 116-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1986.tb10849.x
  13. Goutefongea, R. (1992) Salting and curing. In: Technology of meat and eat products. Girard, J. (ed), Ellis Horwood, Ltd., London, pp. 115-137.
  14. Hamm, R. (1982) Post-mortem changes in muscle with regard to processing of hot-boned beef. Food Technol. 37, 86-91.
  15. Hongsprabhas, P. and Barbut, S. (1999) Effect of pre-heated whey protein level and salt on texture development of poultry meat batters. Food Res. Int. 32, 145-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(99)00065-4
  16. Hullberg, A., Johansson, L., and Lundstrom, K. (2005) Effect of tumbling and RN genotype on sensory perception of curedsmoked pork loin. Meat Sci. 69, 721-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.07.013
  17. Katsaras, K. and Budras, K. D. (1993) The relationship of the microstructure of cooked ham to its properties and quality. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 26, 229-234. https://doi.org/10.1006/fstl.1993.1050
  18. Krause, R. J. (1976) Influence of tumbling and sodium tripolyphosphate on quality, yield, and cure distribution in hams. M.S. thesis, The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, Ohio.
  19. Krause, R. J., Plompton, Jr., R. F., Ockerman, H. W., and Cahill, V. R. (1978) Influence of tumbling and sodium tripolyphosphate on salt and nitrite distribution in porcine muscle. J. Food Sci. 43, 190-192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1978.tb09767.x
  20. Kim, C. J., Jeong, J. Y., Choi, J. H., Seo, W. D., and Lee, E. S. (2003) Effects of tumbling and immersion on quality characteristics of cured pork meat with soy sauce. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 23, 21-27.
  21. KMTA (2011) Actual condition survey of meat distribution. Korea Meat Trade Association
  22. Lawis, T. L., Plimpton, R. F., Ockerman, H. W., and Parrett, N. A. (1992) Electrical stimulation and tumbling affect prerigor cured, sectioned and formed ham roasts. J. Food Sci. 57, 567-568.
  23. Lawrence, T. E., Dikeman, M. E., Hunt, M. C., Kastner, C. L., and Johnson, D. E. (2003) Staged injection marination with calcium lactate, phosphate and salt may improve beef water binding ability and palatability traits. Meat Sci. 65, 967-972. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00312-1
  24. Leak, F. W., Kemp, J. D., Langlois, B. E., and Fox, J. D. (1984) Effect of tumbling and tumbling time on quality and microflora of dry-cured hams. J. Food Sci. 49, 695-698. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1984.tb13190.x
  25. Nishimura, T. Hattori, A., and Takahashi, K. (1995) Structural weakening of intramuscular connective tissue during conditioning of beef. Meat Sci. 39, 127-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(95)80014-X
  26. Ockerman, H, W. and Organisciakm C. S. (1978) Diffusion of curing brine in tumbled and nontumbled porcine tissues. J. Food Prot. 41, 178-184.
  27. Ockerman, H. W., Plimpton, Jr R. F., Cahill, V. R., and Parrett, N. A. (1978) Influence of short term tumbling, salt and phosphate on cured canned pork. J. Food Sci. 43, 878-885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1978.tb02445.x
  28. Offer, G. and Trinick, J. (1993) On the mechanism of water holding in meat: The swelling and shrinking of myofibril. J. Food Sci. 42, 245-281.
  29. Olson, D. G., Parrish, Jr., F. C., and Stromer, M. H. (1976) Myofibril fragmentation and shear resistances of three bovine muscles during postmortem storage. J. Food Sci. 41, 1036-1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1976.tb14384.x
  30. Palanska, O. and Nosal, V. (1991) Meat quality of bulls and heifers of commercial cross breeds of the improved Slovak Cattle with the Limousine breed. (in English), Vedecke Prace Vyskumnedo Ustaru Zivocisn Vyroby Nitre(CSFR). 24, 59.
  31. Pegg, R. B., Fisch, K. M., and Shahidi, F. (2000) Erastz herkommlicher pokelung durch nitritfreie Pokelsysteme. Fleischwirtchaft 80, 86-89.
  32. Piotrowski, E. G., Zailka, L. L., and Wasserman, A. E. (1970) Studies on aroma of cured ham. J. Food Sci. 35, 321-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1970.tb12175.x
  33. Ponting, J. D., Walters, G. C., Forrey, R. R., Jackson, R., and Stanley, W. L. (1966) Osmotic dehydration of fruits. Food Technol. 20, 125-128.
  34. Savage, A. W. J., Warriss, P. D., and Jolly, P. D. (1990) The amount and composition of the protein in drio from stored pig meat. Meat Sci. 27, 289-303 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(90)90067-G
  35. Savell, J. W., Smoth, G. C., and Carpenter, Z. K. (1977) Blade tenderzation of four three weight-grade groups of beef. J. Food Sci. 42, 866-870. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1977.tb12625.x
  36. Solomon, L. W. and Schmidt, G. R. (1980) Effect of vacuum and mixing time on the extractability and functionality of preand post-rigor beef. J. Food Sci. 45, 283-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1980.tb02597.x
  37. Siegel, D. G., Theno, D. M., Schmidt, G. R., and Norton, H. W. (1978) Meat massaging: The effect of salt phosphate and massaging on cooking loss, binding strength and exudates composition in sectioned and forned ham. J. Food Sci. 43, 331-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1978.tb02298.x
  38. Sofos, J. N. (1986) Use of phosphates in low sodium meat products. Food Technol. 40, 52-61.
  39. Tenin, D. and Ademola, O. (1999) Effects of rigor state and tumbling time on quality of goat hams. J. Food Engineering 42, 103-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(99)00097-7
  40. Weiss, J. M. (1973) Ham tumbling and massaging. Western Meat Industry 14, 23-28.

피인용 문헌

  1. Effects of Mechanical Processing and Ganghwa Mugwort on Stability of Chicken Neobiahni during Storage vol.32, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2016.32.3.261
  2. The effect of aging on the quality of Semimembranosus muscle from Hanwoo vol.43, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20160008
  3. The Effects of Enhancement Strategies of Beef Flanks on Composition and Consumer Palatability Characteristics vol.3, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb2019.07.0030