DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multistage Inverters Control Using Surface Hysteresis Comparators

  • Menshawi, Menshawi K. (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, University of Malaya) ;
  • Mekhilef, Saad (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, University of Malaya)
  • Received : 2011.08.17
  • Published : 2013.01.20

Abstract

An alternative technique to control multilevel inverters with vector approximations has been presented. The innovative control method utilizes specially designed two-dimensional hysteresis comparators to simplify the implementation and improve the resultant waveform. The multistage inverter designed with maximum number of levels is operated in such a way to approximate the reference voltage vector by exploiting the large number of multilevel inverter vectors. A three-stage inverter with the main high voltage stage made of three phase, six-switch and singly-fed inverter is considered for application to the proposed design. The proposed control concept is to maintain a higher voltage stage state as long as it can lead to a target vector. High and medium voltage stages controllers are based on surface hysteresis comparators to hold the switching state or to perform the necessary change to achieve its reference voltage with minimal switching losses. The low voltage stage controller is designed to approximate the target reference voltage to the nearest inverter vector using the nearest integer rounding and adjustment comparators. Model simulation and prototype test results show that the proposed control technique clearly outperforms the previous control methods.

Keywords

References

  1. J. S. Lai and F. Z. Peng, "Multilevel converters-A new breed of power converters," IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 509-517, May/Jun. 1996. https://doi.org/10.1109/28.502161
  2. L. Maharjan, S. Inoue, and H. Akagi, "A transformerless energy storage system based on a cascade multilevel PWM converter with star configuration," IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 44, No. 5, pp.1621-1630,Sep./Oct. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2008.2002180
  3. J. Rodriguez, L.G. Franquelo,S. Kouro, J.I. Leon, R.C Portillo, M.A.M Prats, and M. A. Perez, "Multilevel converters: an enabling technology for high-power applications," in Proc. of the IEEE, Vol.97, No.11, pp.1786-1817, Nov. 2009.
  4. A. Rufer, M. Veenstra, K. Gopakumar, "Asymmetric multilevel converter for high resolution voltage phasor generation," in Proc. EPE'Sep.99, p.10, 1999.
  5. M.N. Abdul Kadir, S. Mekhilef, and W. P. Hew, "Direct torque control permanent magnet synchronous motor drive with asymmetrical multilevel inverter supply,"7th International Conference on Power Electronics, pp.1196-1201, Oct. 2007.
  6. S. Mariethoz and A. Rufer, "Multisource DC-DC converter for the supply of hybrid multilevel converter" IEEE 41st IAS Annual Meeting Industry Applications Conference, pp. 982-87, Oct. 2006.
  7. M. Veenstra and A. Rufer, "Control of a hybrid asymmetric multi-level inverter for competitive medium-voltage industrial drives," IEEE 38th Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 1, pp. 190-197, Oct. 2003.
  8. Y. Lai and F. Shyu, "Topology for hybrid multilevel inverter," IEE Proceedings on Electric Power Applications, Vol. 149, No. 6, pp. 449-58, 2002.
  9. S. Mariethoz and A. Rufer, "New configurations for the three-phase asymmetrical multilevel inverter," IEEE 39th IAS Annual Meeting, pp. 828-835, 2004.
  10. S. Mariethoz and A. Rufer, "Resolution and efficiency improvements for three-phase cascade multilevel inverters," IEEE 35thAnnual Power Electronics Specialists Conference PESC04, pp.4441-46, Jun. 2004.
  11. M. AbdulKadir and Z.F. Hussien, "Asymmetrical multilevel inverter: maximum resolution for H-bridge topology," The Sixth International Conference on Power Electronics and Drives Systems PEDS Kuala Lumpur Malaysia, pp. 1068-1071, Nov./Dec. 2005.
  12. Y. Liu and F.L. Luo, "Trinary hybrid 81-level multilevel inverter for motor drive with zero common-mode voltage," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 55, No. 3, pp.1014-1021, Mar. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2007.909072
  13. E. Babaei, "A cascade multilevel converter topology with reduced number of switches," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., Vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 2657-2664, Nov. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2008.2005192
  14. M. A. Pérez, "Predictive control algorithm technique for multilevel asymmetric cascaded H-bridge inverters," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 55, No. 12, pp. 4354-4361, Dec. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2008.2006948
  15. J. Rodríguez, P. Correa, and L. Moran, "A vector control technique for medium-voltage multilevel inverters," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 882-88, Aug. 2002 https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2002.801235
  16. S. Fukuda, T. Yoshida, and S. Ueda, "Control strategies of a hybrid multilevel converter for expanding adjustable output voltage range," IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 827-835, Mar./Apr. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2009.2013604
  17. C. Rech, H. Pinheiro, H. A. Grundling, H. L. Hey, and J. R. Pinheiro, "Analysis and comparison of hybrid multilevel voltage source inverters," In IEEE 33rd Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference PESC02,Vol.2, pp. 491-496, 2002.
  18. M. N. Abdul Kadir, S. Mekhilef,and M. Nakaoka, "Voltage control of three-stage hybrid multilevel inverter using vector transformation," in Proc.PEMD10. 5th IET conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives, Apr. 2010.
  19. K. Corzine and Y. Familiant, "A new cascaded multilevel H-bridge drive," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 125-131, Jan. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1109/63.988678
  20. M. Abdul Kadir, S. Mekhilef, and H.W. Ping, "Voltage vector control of a hybrid three-stage 18-level inverter by vector decomposition," IET Power Electronics, Vol. 3, No. 4, p.601-611, Jul. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-pel.2009.0085
  21. S. Mekhilef and M. N. Abdul Kadir, "Voltage control of three-stage hybrid multilevel inverter using vector transformation," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., Vol.25, No.10, pp.2599-2606, Oct. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2010.2051040
  22. J. Rao and Y. Li, "Power flow management of a new hybrid cascaded multilevel inverter," in Proc. Int. Conf. Elect. Mach. Syst., pp. 58-63, 2007.
  23. M.N. Abdul Kadir, S. Mekhilef, and H. W. Ping, "Dual vector control strategy for a three-stage hybrid cascaded multilevel inverter," Journal of Power Electronics, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp.155-164, Mar. 2010. https://doi.org/10.6113/JPE.2010.10.2.155
  24. S. Mekhilef and M. N. A. Kadir, "Novel vector control method for three-stage hybrid cascaded multilevel inverter," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol.58, No.4, pp.1339-1349, Apr. 2011 https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2010.2049716
  25. T. S. Ustun and S. Mekhilef "Effects of a static synchronous series compensator (sssc) based on soft switching 48-pulse pwm inverter on the power demand from the grid," Journal of Power Electronics, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp.85-90, Jan. 2010. https://doi.org/10.6113/JPE.2010.10.1.085
  26. M. E. Ahmed and S. Mekhilef, "Design and implementation of a multilevel three-phase inverter with less switches and low output voltage distortion," Journal of Power Electronics, Vol.9, No.4, pp.594-604, Jul. 2009.

Cited by

  1. Experimental Validation of a Cascaded Single Phase H-Bridge Inverter with a Simplified Switching Algorithm vol.14, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.6113/JPE.2014.14.3.507
  2. Robust Sensorless Sliding Mode Flux Observer for DTC-SVM-based Drive with Inverter Nonlinearity Compensation vol.14, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.6113/JPE.2014.14.1.125
  3. Design and Implementation of a New Multilevel DC-Link Three-phase Inverter vol.14, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.6113/JPE.2014.14.2.292