Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Monensin on Metabolism and Production in Dairy Saanen Goats in Periparturient Period

  • Sadjadian, Rasool (Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad) ;
  • Seifi, Hesam A. (Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad) ;
  • Mohri, Mehrdad (Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad) ;
  • Naserian, Abbas Ali (Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad) ;
  • Farzaneh, Nima (Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)
  • Received : 2012.06.21
  • Accepted : 2012.09.15
  • Published : 2013.01.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This trial evaluated the effects of dietary supplementation with monensin sodium on dry matter intake, metabolic parameters and milk yield and milk composition of dairy Saanen goats in the periparturient period. Twelve Saanen pregnant dairy goats were assigned to a treatment and a control group. Saanen goats were fed monensin as its 10% sodium salt in the amount of 33 mg/kg of total dry matter intake during 30 d before parturition till d 42 in milk. Blood samples were collected from each goat at d 30, 15 and 7 before expected kidding time and also in d 1, 7, 13, 19, 21, 28, 35 and 42 postpartum. The serum concentrations of ${\beta}$-Hydroxybutyrate (BHBA), non-esterifed fatty acid (NEFA), calcium, magnesium, inorganic phosphorus, cholesterol, triglyceride, urea, total protein, albumin and glucose and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity were determined. The BHBA concentration significantly decreased in goats, which received monensin in comparison to controls in the postpartum period (p = 0.049). The concentration of sodium (Na) was significantly influenced by monensin treatment in the postpartum period (p = 0.048). In addition, the difference in dry matter intake was highly significant between the two groups during the pre-partum period. Controls had more dry matter intake (DMI) than treatment goats (p = 0.0001). Mean 3.5% fat corrected milk production was not influenced by monensin treatment. However, milk fat percentage was significantly decreased in monensin treated goats (p = 0.0017).

Keywords

References

  1. Austin, A. R. and R. M. Wilde. 1985. The effect of sodium monensin in pregnant ewes. Br. Vet. J. 141:628-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1935(85)90010-7
  2. Bagg, R., C. P. Vessie, C. P. Dick, T. Duffield, J. B. Wilson and J. J. Aramini. 2005. Milk residues and performance of lactating dairy cows administered high doses of monensin. Can. J. Vet. Res. 69:180-185.
  3. Baginski, E. S., S. S. Marie, W. L. Clark and B. Zak. 1973. Direct microdetermination of serum calcium. Clin. Chem. Acta. 46:46-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(73)90101-0
  4. Barham, D. and P. Trinder. 1972. An improved color reagent for the determination of blood glucose by the oxidase system. Analyst 97:142-145. https://doi.org/10.1039/an9729700142
  5. Bauman, D. E. and J. M. Griinari. 2003. Nutritional regulation of milk fat synthesis. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 23:203-227. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.23.011702.073408
  6. Baumgard, L. H., B. A. Corl, D. A. Dwyer, A. Saeb and D. A. Bauman. 2000. Identification of the conjugated linoleic acid isomer that inhibits milk fat synthesis. Am. J. Phys. 278:R179-R184.
  7. Beckett, S., I. Lean, R. Dyson, W. Tranter and L. Wade. 1998. Effects of monensin on the reproduction, health, and milk production of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 81:1563-1573. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75722-4
  8. Bergen, W. G. and D. B. Bates. 1984. Ionophores: Their effect on production efficiency and mode of action. J. Anim. Sci. 58:1465-1483.
  9. Bergmeyer, H. N., M. Horder and R. Rej. 1986. International federation of clinical chemistry (IFCC) scientific committee analytical section: approved recommendation on IFCC method for measurement of catalytic concentration of enzyme, part 2: IFCC method for aspartate aminotransferase. J. Clin. Chem. Clin. Biochem. 24:497-510.
  10. Brown, D. L. and O. E. Hogue. 1985. Effects of feeding monensin sodium to lactating goats: milk composition and ruminal volatile fatty acids, Cornell University. J. Dairy Sci. 68:1141-1147. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)80940-1
  11. Cole, T. G., S. G. Klotzch and J. McNamara. 1997. Measurement of triglyceride concentration. In: Handbook of Lipoprotein Testing (Ed. N. Rifai, G. R. Warnick, M. H. Dominiczak). AACC press, Washington, pp. 115-126.
  12. Daly, J. A. and G. Ertingshausen. 1972. Direct method for determining inorganic phosphate in serum with the "CentrifiChem". Clin. Chem. 18:263-265.
  13. Deeg, R. and J. Ziegenhorn. 1983. Kinetic enzymatic method for automated determination of total cholesterol in serum. Clin. Chem. 29:1798-1802.
  14. DeVries, G. H., P. Mamunes, C. D. Miller and D. M. Hayward. 1976. Quantitative determination of C6:O-C18:3 serum nonesterified fatty acids by gas-liquid chromatography. Anal. Biochem. 70:156-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2697(76)80057-7
  15. Dick, C. P., G. V. Vessie, J. W. Moran and M. Coleman. 1996. The determination of monensin residues in cattle following the administration of two monensin controlled release capsules. Proceedings of the World Buiatrics Congress, Edinburgh, 254.
  16. Dinius, D. A., M. S. Simpson and P. B. Marsh. 1976. Effect of monensin fed with forage on digestion and the ruminal ecosystem of steers. J. Anim. Sci. 42:229-234.
  17. Dubuc, J., D. DuTremblay, J. Baril, R. Bagg, M. Brodeur, T. Duffield and L. DesCôteaux. 2010. A field study on the effects of dietary monensin on milk production and milk composition in dairy cows. Can. Vet. J. 51:375-379.
  18. Duffield, T. F. and R. Bagg. 2000. Use of Ionophores in lactating dairy cattle: A review. Can. Vet. J. 41:388-394.
  19. Duffield, T. F., A. R. Rabiee and I. J. Lean. 2008. A meta-analysis of the impact of monensin in lactating dairy cattle. Part 1. metabolic effects. J. Dairy Sci. 91:1334-1346. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0607
  20. Edmondson, M. A. and D. G. Pough. 2009. Pregnancy toxemia in sheep and goats. In: Current Veterinary Therapy Food Animal Practice, 5th Ed. Saunders, St. Louis, pp. 144-145.
  21. Fellner, V., F. D. Sauer and J. K. G. Kramer. 1997. Effect of nigericin, monensin, and tetronasin on biohydrogenation in continuous flow- through ruminal fermenters. J. Dairy Sci. 80: 921-928. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76015-6
  22. Harwood, D. 2004. Diseases of dairy goats. In Practice 26, pp. 248-259.
  23. Ipharraguerre, I. R. and J. H. Clark. 2003. Usefulness of ionophores for lactating dairy cows: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 106:39-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00065-8
  24. Johnson, A. M., E. M. Rohlfs and L. M. Silverman. 1999. Proteins, In: Tietz's Textbook of Clinical Pathology, 3rd Ed. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, USA, pp. 477-540.
  25. McMurray, C. H., W. J. Blanchflower and D. A. Rice. 1984. Automated kinetic method for D-3-hydroxybutyrate in plasma or serum. Clin. Chem. 30:421-425.
  26. NRC (National Research Council). 2007. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants, sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids. The National Academic press, washington DC, USA.
  27. Petersson-Wolfe, C. S., K. E. Leslie, T. Osborne, B. W. McBride, R. Bagg and G. Vessie. 2007. Effect of monensin delivery method on dry matter intake, body condition score, and metabolic parameters in transition dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 90:1870-1879. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-402
  28. Phipps, R. H., J. I. Wilkinson, L. J. Jonker, M. Tarrant, A. K. Jones and A. Hodge. 2000. Effect of monensin on milk production of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2789-2794. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75176-9
  29. Plaizier, J. C., A. M. Fairfield, P. A. Azevedo, A. Nikkhah, T. F. Duffield, G. H. Crow, R. Bagg, P. Dick and B. W. McBride. 2005. Effects of monensin and stage of lactation on variation of blood metabolites within twenty-four hours in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 88:3595-3602. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73044-7
  30. Poos, M. I., T. L. Hanson and T. J. Klopfenstein. 1979. Monensin effects on diet digestibilitiy, ruminal protein bypass and microbial protein synthesis. J. Anim. Sci. 48:1516.
  31. Ratge, D., K. P. Kohse and H. Wisser. 1986. Measurement of magnesium in serum and urine with a random access analyzer by use of a modified Xylidyl blue-1 procedure. Clin. Chem. Acta 159:197-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(86)90052-5
  32. Sauer, F. D., J. K. G. Kramer and W. J. Cantwell. 1989. Antiketogenic effects of monensin in early lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 72:436-442. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79125-6
  33. Schanne, F. A. X., A. B. Kane, E. E. Young and J. L. Farber. 1979. Calcium dependence of toxic cell death: A final common pathway. Science 206:700-702. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.386513
  34. Schelling, G. T. 1984. Monensin: mode of action in the rumen. J. Anim. Sci. 58:1518-1527.
  35. Schlumbohm, C. and J. Harmeyer. 2004. Hyperketonemia impairs glucose metabolism in pregnant and non- pregnant Ewes. J. Dairy sci. 87:350-358. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73174-4
  36. Scott, R., S. R. Starnes, J. W. Spears, M. A. Froetschel and W. J. Jr Croom. 1984. Influence of monensin and lasalocid on mineral metabolism and ruminal urease activity in steers. J. Nutr. 114:518-525.
  37. Shetaewi, M. M. and T. T. Ross. 1991. Effects of concentrate supplementation and lasalocid on serum chemistry and hormone profiles in Rambouillet ewes. Small Rum. Res. 4:365-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4488(91)90082-2
  38. Simpson, M. E. 1978. Effects of certain antibiotics on in vitro cellulose digestibility and volatile fatty acid production by ruminal microorganisms. J. Anim. Sci. 47(Suppl. 1):439.
  39. Smith, J. B. and E. Rosengurt. 1978. Serum stimulates the Na-K pump in quiescent fibroblasts by increasing Na entry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75:5560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.75.11.5560
  40. Taghipoor, B., H. A. Seifi, M. Mohri, N. Farzaneh and A. A. Naserian. 2011. Effect of prepartum administration of monensin on metabolism of pregnant ewes. Livest. Sci. 135:231-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.07.015
  41. Tomas, H. 1998. Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics. 1sted., TH-Books, Verlagsgesellschaft, Frankfurt. pp. 208-214 and 644-647.
  42. Tyler, J. W., D. F. Wolfe and R. Maddox. 1992. Clinical indications for dietary ionophores in ruminants. Compend. Contin. Educ. Pract. Vet. 14:989-993.
  43. Wagner, J. R., H. B. Green, J. T. Symanowski, J. I. D. Wilkinson, J. S. Davis, M. R. Himstedt, M. S. Allen, E. Bock, J. J. Brennan, H. H. Head, J. J. Kenelly, J. N. Nielsen, J. E. Nocek, M. J. Van Der List and L. W. Whitlow. 1999. Effect of monensin on feed intake, body weight, and body condition in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 82(Suppl. 1):75.
  44. Wang, Z. and L. A. Goonewardene. 2004. The use of mixed models in the analysis of animal experiments with repeated measure data. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84:1-11. https://doi.org/10.4141/A03-123

Cited by

  1. EFEITO DA MONENSINA SÓDICA SOBRE O PERFIL METABÓLICO DE OVELHAS ANTES E APÓS O PARTO vol.17, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/1089-6891v17i128370
  2. Effects of supplementation during late gestation on goat performance and behavior under rangeland conditions vol.93, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8609
  3. EFFECTS OF DIETARY SODIUM MONENSIN ON THE METABOLIC AND HORMONAL PROFILES OF DAIRY GOATS DURING THE PERIPARTUM PERIOD vol.19, pp.0, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-6891v19e-51453
  4. Pre- and Post-partum Berberine Supplementation in Dairy Goats as a Novel Strategy to Mitigate Oxidative Stress and Inflammation vol.8, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.743455
  5. Regulation of Nutritional Metabolism in Transition Dairy Goats: Energy Balance, Liver Activity, and Insulin Resistance in Response to Berberine Supplementation vol.11, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082236