DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Resource Substitutability for Hiking Activity and Related Factors - Focusing on Mudeungsan Provincial Park and Eudeungsan -

하이킹 휴양활동을 위한 자원 대체성과 관련요인 - 무등산 도립공원과 어둥산을 대상으로 -

  • 김상미 (전남대학교 농업생명과학대학 임학과) ;
  • 김상오 (전남대학교 농업생명과학대학 임학과)
  • Received : 2013.07.26
  • Accepted : 2013.12.05
  • Published : 2013.12.31

Abstract

This study was conducted to find out availability of a urban forest (Eudeungsan) as a substitute place of Mudeungsan Provincial Park (MPP) in overuse problem and to identify related factors to place substitutability. During June-August of 2012, 232 samples who have ever visited both of the two places (i.e., MPP and Euduengsan) in Gwang-ju city were selected by using convenient sampling and snowball sampling methods. Self-administered questionnaire survey was conducted, and the valid responses from 225 samples (97.0%) were used for data analysis. 24.2% of respondents had "considerably" or "very much" intention to use the substitute place, and 65.5% of respondents showed "a little" or "somewhat" 10.3% of respondents didn't have any intention to visit Eudeungsan as a substitute place of MPP. Generally, socio-demographic and visiting characteristics were not related with intention to visit Eudeungsan as a substitute place of MPP. It was only found that respondents who largely visit 'alone' to Eudeungsan tended to have higher intention to visit the substitute place than those who visit 'in group.' Three factors of reasons to visit Eudeungsan (i.e.,Challenge/self-development: ${\beta}=0.35$; Accessibility/familiarity: ${\beta}=0.27$; Adventure: ${\beta}=-0.19$) influenced intention to visit the substitute place. Relationship between reasons to visit and intention to visit the substitute place was found. No direct relationship was found between perceived similarity of the places and intention to visit substitute place, and similarity of recreation experiences showed perfect mediating effects between the two variables.

본 연구는 과용문제가 있다고 판단되는 무등산도립공원의 이용분산을 위한 도시근교림(어등산)의 대체자원으로서의 이용가능성 타진과 더불어 휴양자원의 대체성(substitutability)에 영향을 미치는 관련요인을 규명하기 위하여 시행되었다. 2012년 6~8월 중 광주광역시 근교림의 하나인 어등산과 무등산도립공원 두 장소를 모두 방문한 경험이 있는 휴양객을 대상으로 편의샘플링과 스노우볼 샘플링에 의해 추출된 232명을 대상으로 자기기입식 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 이중 225명(97.0%)의 응답이 본 연구의 분석을 위해 이용되었다. 24.2%의 응답자가 "상당히" 또는 "매우 많이", 65.5%의 응답자는 "약간" 또는 "다소" 무등산의 대체장소로서 어등산 이용의도를 나타냈다. 응답자의 10.3%는 어등산을 무등산의 대체장소로서 이용할 의향이 전혀 없는 것으로 조사되었다. 전반적으로 인구사회학적 특성(성별, 연령, 결혼상태, 소득 및 교육수준, 지역거주기간)과 방문행태(방문경험수준, 방문요일)는 무등산도립공원의 대체장소로서 어등산의 이용의사와 관련이 없었다. 단지 '주로 혼자서' 방문하는 응답자는 '그룹' 방문 응답자에 비해 대체장소에 대한 높은 방문의도를 나타냈다. 또한 7개 요인의 방문이유는 대체장소 방문의도의 25.0%를 설명하였으며 이들 중 3개요인 즉 '도전/자기계발(${\beta}=0.35$)', '접근성/친숙성(${\beta}=0.27$)', '모험(${\beta}=-0.19$)'은 P<0.05수준에서 유의성이 있는 것으로 조사되었다. 두 장소 간 장소속성의 유사성은 대체장소 방문의도와 직접적 관계가 없었으며 휴양경험의 유사성은 장소속성의 유사성과 대체장소 방문의도와의 관계에서 완전매개효과를 나타냈다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ajzen, I.(1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2): 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Arnberger, A. and C. Brandenburg(2007) Past on-site experience, crowding perceptions, and use displacement of visitor groups to a peri-urban national park. Environmental Management 40(1): 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0355-8
  3. Backlund, E.(2005) The importance of place and the substitutability of river recreation resources: Empirical evidence from the Chattooga Wild and Scenic River. Proceedings of the 2005 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report GTR-NE-341: 380-386.
  4. Backlund, E., W. Hammitt and R. Bixler(2006) Experience use history and relationship to the importance of substitute stream attributes. Human Dimensions of wildlife 11(6): 411-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200600984356
  5. Baron, R.M. and D.A. Kenny(1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6): 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  6. Baumgartner, R. and T. Heberlein(1981) Process, goal, and social interaction in recreation: What makes an activity substitutable. Leisure Sciences 4(4): 443-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490408109512980
  7. Christensen, J. and D. Yoesting(1977) The substitutability concept: a need for further development. Journal of Leisure Research 9(3): 188-207.
  8. Clark, R. and G. Stankey(1979) The recreation opportunity spectrum: a framework for planning, management, and research. USDA Forest Service Research Paper PNW-98, 32pp.
  9. Ditton, R.B. and S.G. Sutton(2004) Substitutability in recreational fishing. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 9(2): 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871200490441748
  10. Hammitt, W.E., E.A. Backlund and R.D. Bixler(2004) Stream attributes for selecting substitutable fishing resources. Proceedings of the 2004 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report GTR-NE-326: 289-294.
  11. Hendee, J. and R. Burdge(1974) The substitutability concept: Implications for recreation management and research. Journal of Leisure Research 6: 157-162.
  12. Hong, S.K.(1991) A study on destination choice of urban park users in Kwangju. The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 19(3): 3128-3143. (in Korean with English abstract)
  13. Hvenegaard, G. and P. Dearden(1998) Ecotourism versus tourism in a Thai national park. Annals of Tourism Research 25(3): 700-720. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(98)00020-6
  14. Hyun, W.Y. and R. Ditton(2006) Using multinomial logistic regression analysis to understand anglers willingness to substitute other fishing locations. Proceedings of the 2006
  15. Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report GTR-NRS-P-14: 248-255.
  16. Jang, H.C., S.K. Hong and S.H. Lee(2008) Understanding tourism constraints for travel intention and actual travel behavior. Journal of Tourism Management Research 22(4): 207-222. (in Korean with English abstract)
  17. Jee, J.H.(2000) A study on the choice process of tourism destination. Journal of Travel Study 11: 235-249. (in Korean with English abstract)
  18. Jung, S.C.(2003) Korean female traveler's travel destination choice behavior. Korea Academic Society of Tourism Information 15: 289-312. (in Korean with English abstract)
  19. Jung, S.C.(2010) Travel destination choice attitudes of Korean students and foreign students. Korea Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research 24(2): 163-180. (in Korean with English abstract)
  20. Kim, S.O. and K.I. Oh(1998) Present use of trails and influential factors on trail selection -in Mudeung-san Provincial Park-. Journal of Korean Forest Society 87(2): 131-144. (in Korean with English abstract)
  21. Koo, B.K. and H.J. Lee(2009) A comparison between decision- making processes in choosing travel destinations in different countries: Focusing on female tourists in Korea, China and Japan. Journal of Tourism Management Research 24(4): 285-306. (in Korean with English abstract)
  22. Lee, J.H. and G.U. Kang(1995) A study for user's characteristics in urban forest: case study of Apsan natural park in Taegu. Korea Journal For Economics 3(1): 99-117. (in Korean with English abstract)
  23. Lee, S.Y. and T.H. Lee(2000) Study on the willingness of horse racing betters to visit the old mining town casino as Substitutes for track wagering. The Tourism Sciences Society of Korea 23(2): 341-353. (in Korean with English abstract)
  24. Lee, Y.H., K.W. Kim and W.H. Byun(2009) Visitors' use behavior and attitude of Je-Seok Mt. urban forest in Gwangju metropolitan city. J. Kor. Soc. People Plants Environ. 12(6): 45-56. (in Korean with English abstract)
  25. Manfredo, M.J. and D. Anderson(1987) The influence of activity importance and similarity on perception of recreation substitutes. Leisure Sciences 9(2): 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490408709512148
  26. Manning, R.(2011) Studies in outdoor recreation: search and research for satisfaction. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR
  27. Marsinko, A.(1999) The effect of fees on recreation site choice: Management agency implications. Proceeding of the 1999 Northeastern Recreation Symposium. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-269: 164-71.
  28. Needham, M.D. and J.J. Vaske(2013) Activity substitutability and degree of specialization among deer and elk hunters in multiple states. Leisure Sciences 35: 235-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2013.780513
  29. Oh, K.K., B.H. Kim and C.E. Kim(2011) Estimation number of visitor's and moving pattern in Mudeungsan Provincial Park. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 25(2): 227-234. (in Korean with English abstract)
  30. Park, C.I.(2001) A choice model of visitor's at national park in the case of Mt. Kyeryong. The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 29(1): 11-21. (in Korean with English abstract)
  31. Shelby, B. and J.J. Vaske(1991) Resource and activity substitutes for recreational salmon fishing in New Zealand. Leisure Sciences 13(1): 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409109513122
  32. Shelby, B.(1985) Resource and activity substitutes for recreational salmon fishing in New Zealand. Proceedings-Symposium on Recreation Choice Behavior. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-184: 79-85.
  33. Tseng, Y.P. and R. Ditton(2007) Modeling recreation participants' willingness to substitute using multi-attribute indicators. Proceedings of the 2007 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report GTR-NRS-P-23: 210-215.
  34. Vaske, J.J., M.P. Donnelly and B. Shelby(1990) Comparing two approaches for identifying recreation activity substitutes. Leisure Sciences 12(3): 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409009513108
  35. Vaske, J.J., M.P. Donnelly and D.L. Tweed(1983) Recreationistdefined versus researcher-defined similarity judgements in substitutability research. Journal of Leisure Research: 251-262.
  36. Wynveen, C., G.T. Kyle, W.E. Hammitt and J.D. Absher(2007) Exploring the effect of experience use history and place bonding on resource substitution. Proceedings of the 2007 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report GTR-NRS-PP-23: 114-122.