Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Appropriability Mechanism Strategy for Domestic IT Manufacturing Companies

국내 IT 제조기업의 전유성 확보 전략

  • 이승준 (충북대학교 경영정보학과) ;
  • 박성택 (충북대학교 경영정보학과) ;
  • 김영기 (충북대학교 경영정보학과)
  • Received : 2013.09.16
  • Accepted : 2013.11.20
  • Published : 2013.11.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Securing the appropriability strategy of R&D funding for technology innovation is very important because R&D needs a lot of time and money. Appropriability means the environmental factors that govern an innovator's ability to capture profits generated by an innovation. Generally appropriability mechanism has five kinds, including patent, secrecy, lead time advantage, complementary sales & service, complementary manufacturing. In this paper, we surveyed domestic software industry professionals about appropriability mechanism strategy, and presented a result of priority of each factor and difference between previous research and this study, using the pair-wise comparison method. The result of study showed that domestic IT manufacturing companies prefer patent better than other appropriability mechanism.

기술혁신을 하기 위한 R&D에는 많은 시간과 비용이 투입된다. 따라서 기술혁신을 위해 투자된 연구개발 비용에 대한 전유성을 확보하기 위한 전략이 중요하다. 전유성이란 기술혁신에 대한 수익을 배타적으로 보호 확보할 수 있는 정도를 뜻하며 특허(patent), 영업비밀(secrecy), 리드타임(lead time advantage), 보완적 판매 및 서비스(complementary sales & service), 보완적 제조(complementary manufacturing) 등 5가지의 전유 메커니즘(appropriability mechanism)이 있다. 본 연구에서는 국내 소프트웨어 산업의 전문가들을 대상으로 어떠한 전유성 확보전략을 취하고 있는지에 대하여 설문조사를 하였고, 쌍대비교 기법을 통해 각 요인들의 우선순위를 도출하여 선행연구와 비교하였다. 분석 결과, 국내 IT 제조기업에서는 영업비밀, 특허, 리드타임, 보완적 판매 및 서비스, 보완적 제조의 순으로 전유 메커니즘을 선호하고 있음을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Eun-Young Kim, A Study on the Determinants of Technological Innovation in the Korean Manufacturing Firms-Focusing on Technological Regime, Industrial Economic Research, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 1451-1478, 2011.
  2. Schumpeter, J.A., "Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy", London, George Allen and Unwin, 1976.
  3. Byung-Kyu Yoo, R&D Investment and Economic Result, Science and Technology Policy, Vol. 146, pp. 1-20, 2004.
  4. Arrow, K., Economic Welfare and Allocation of Resources for Inventions, in Nelson, R.R.(Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton University Press, pp. 609-626, 1962.
  5. Hurmelinna P., Kylaheiko K., Jauhiainen T., The Janus Face of the Appropiability Regime in the Protection of Innovations : Theoretical Re-appraisal and Empirical Analysis, Technovation, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 133-144, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.09.011
  6. Hwan-Joo Seo, Reinforcement of Patent and Technology Innovation : Focus on EU, European Union Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 1-19, 2004.
  7. Cohen, Wesley M., Richard R. Nelson and John P. Walsh, "Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent(or Not)," Working Paper, No. 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2000.
  8. Breschi, S., F. Malerba and L. Orsenigo, Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation, Economic Journal, Vol. 110, pp. 388-410, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00530
  9. Levin, R.C., A.K. Klevorick, R.R. Nelson and S.G. Winter, Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 3, pp. 783-820, 1987.
  10. Seong-Taek Park, Seung-Jun Lee, Su-Hyun Jung, Young-Ki Kim, A Study on the Secure Plan of Profit in R&D : Centering on Centering on Cellular Phone Parts Industry, Humanities and Social Science Studies, Vol. 28, pp. 139-162, 2010.
  11. Schankerman, Mark, How Valuable is Patent Protection? Estimates by Technology Field, Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 29, No.1, pp. 77-107, 1998. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555817
  12. Young-Hee Im, Patent Information : Intellectual Property and Industrial Property, Journal of the KSME, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 85-87, 1998.
  13. Jung-Ho Kim, The Persistence of First-Mover Advantages, KAIST College of Business Online Knowledge Service, 2010.
  14. Joshua S. Gans, Scott Stern, The Product Market and the Market for "Ideas" : Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs, Research Policy, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 333-350, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00103-8
  15. ChosunBiz: http://biz.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2012/05/21/2012052101136.html
  16. Gartner: www.gartner.com
  17. Sang-Sin Kim, Seok-Joon Choi, The Relative Preference of Patent and Secrecy for Appropriation Mechanisms, Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 159-186, 2009.
  18. Kyu-Ho Park, A Study on the Determinants of IP Protection of Innovation Results in Korean Manufacturing Sector, Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 1-21, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2006.9668616
  19. Wyatt, S., G. Bertin and K. Pavitt, Patents and Multinational Corporations : Results from Questionnaires, Wolrd Patent Information, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 196-212, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/0172-2190(85)90145-0
  20. Najib Harabi, Appropriability of Technical Innovations An Empirical Analysis, Research Policy, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 981-992, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00812-4
  21. Anthony Arundel, The Relative Effectiveness of Patents and Secrecy for Appropriation, Research Policy, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 611-624, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00100-1
  22. Hee-Ja Kwon, Suk-Kyu Kim, An Analysis on Political Plan Priorities in Billing Infrastructure of Sport Industry (Using Delphi Technique), Korean Journal of Sport Management, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 113-122, 2006.
  23. Yong-Gon Cho, Keun-Tae Cho, Formulating R&D Strategy for Core Technology in Biotechnology Using the Delphi and the AHP, Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers and the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society Conference, pp. 9-12, 2004
  24. Han-Jin Lee, Chang-Sun Yum, Development of a Comparison-Shopping Agent System Considering Buyer's Preference, Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systmes Engineering, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 84-91, 2005.
  25. Robert Goldscheider., Licensing Best Practices : The LESI Guide to Strategic Issues and Contemporary Realities, John Wiley & Sons, 2002
  26. Thomas L. Saaty, The Analytical Hierarchy Process, New York : McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  27. Chan-Dong Kim, A Study on the Problem for Software Patent Grant, Korean Intellectual Property Right and Law Institute, Intellectual Property, Vol. 25, pp. 40-56, 2008.

Cited by

  1. A study on the entrepreneurial intention determinants of university students vol.12, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.11.141
  2. Establishing the importance weight of appropriability mechanism by using AHP: the case of the China’s electronic industry vol.19, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-016-0608-3
  3. Difference Across Indutries of Innovation Appropriability Mechanism's Effectiveness and Classification vol.12, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.6.135