DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Flood Inundation Using LiDAR and LISFLOOD Model

LiDAR 고도자료와 LISFLOOD 모형을 이용한 홍수범람해석

  • Choi, Cheon-Kyu (Water Resources Research Division, Korea Institute of Construction Technology) ;
  • Choi, Yun-Seok (Water Resources Research Division, Korea Institute of Construction Technology) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Tak (Water Resources Research Division, Korea Institute of Construction Technology)
  • 최천규 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원연구실) ;
  • 최윤석 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원연구실) ;
  • 김경탁 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원연구실)
  • Received : 2013.08.14
  • Accepted : 2013.10.07
  • Published : 2013.12.31

Abstract

Great loss of life and property has been occurred by the severe flood globally. In Korea, a flood inundation map is used as one of the non-structural measures for reducing flood damage, and various inundation models have been studied for flood inundation analysis. This study applies LiDAR data and LISFLOOD model for flood inundation analysis and discusses the the modeling results from levee breaching scenarios for evaluating the applicability of the model to stream inundation modeling. In the results of LISFLOOD modeling, maximum inundation area was similar to the inundation map by HEC-RAS model just less than 4%. The inundation area by each levee breaching scenario showed the difference from 0.2% to 6.5%. Inundation processes were different each other according to the position of levee breach point, and maximum inundation area and depth were changed by the flow direction of stream and flood plain. This study shows that LISFLOOD model can be applied properly to stream inundation analysis using various inundation scenarios.

세계적으로 홍수로 인하여 인명과 재산의 피해가 발생하고 있다. 국내에서는 홍수피해를 줄이기 위하여 비구조물적 대책의 하나로 홍수범람지도를 작성하고 있으며, 홍수범람해석을 위한 다양한 모형이 연구되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 LiDAR 자료와 LISFLOOD 모형을 이용한 홍수범람해석을 수행하여 국내 하천에서의 적용성을 검토하고, 파제 시나리오에 의한 파제 위치별 범람해석 결과를 평가하였다. 범람해석 결과 최대 홍수범람면적에서는 HEC-RAS 모형에 의해 작성된 홍수범람도와 차이가 약 4% 미만으로 유사하였으며, 파제 시나리오에 의한 홍수범람해석에서는 시나리오 별로 약 0.2%~6.5%의 범람면적 차이를 나타내었다. 또한 파제 위치에 따라서 홍수범람 양상이 다르게 나타났으며, 제내지에서 범람류의 흐름방향과 하천 흐름방향의 관계에 따라 최대 홍수범람면적과 최대 침수심이 변화함을 확인할 수 있었다. 연구 결과 국내 하천에서 홍수범람해석시 LISFLOOD 모형의 적용이 가능하고, 다양한 범람상황을 고려한 홍수범람해석이 가능할 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Baldassarre, G.D., G. Schumann, P.D. Bates, J.E. Freer and K.J. Beven. 2010. Flood-plain mapping: a critical discussion of deterministic and probabilistic approaches. Hydrological Sciences Journal 55(3):364-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626661003683389
  2. Bates, P.D. and A.P.J. De Roo. 2000. A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation. Journal of Hydrology 236(1-2):54-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00278-X
  3. Bates, P.D., M.S. Horritt and T.J. Fewtrell. 2010. A simple inertial of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling. Journal of Hydrology 387:33-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.027
  4. Beckers, B. and Schutt, B. 2013. The elaborate floodwater harvesting system of ancient Resafa in Syria-Construction and reliability. Journal of Arid Environments 96:31-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.04.004
  5. Cho, W.H., K.Y. Han and K.H. Ahn. 2010. Flood risk mapping with FLUMEN model application. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineering 30(2B):169 -177 (조완희, 한건연, 안기홍. 2010. FLUMEN모형을 적용한 홍수위험지도의 작성. 대한토목학회논문집 30(2B):169-177).
  6. Coulthard, T.J., D.M. Hicks, M.J. Van De Weil. 2007. Cellular modelling of river catchment and reaches: advantages, limitations and prospects. Geomorphology 90:192-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.030
  7. Dankers, R., O.B. Christensen, L. Feyen and M. Kalas. 2007. Evaluation of very high-resolution climate model data for simulating flood hazards in the upper danube basin. Journal of Hydrology 347:319-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.055
  8. De Roo, A.P.J., D.G. Wesseling, and Van Deursen. 2000. Physically-based River basin modelling within a GIS: the LISFLOOD model. Hydrological Process 14:1981-1992. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1085(20000815/30)14:11/12<1981::AID-HYP49>3.0.CO;2-F
  9. Ha, C.Y., K.Y. Han and W.H. Cho. 2010. 2-D inundation analysis according to post-spacing of DEMs from LiDAR using GIS. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 13(1):74-88 (하창용, 한건연, 조완희. 2010. GIS를 활용한 LiDAR 자료의 밀도에 따른 2차원 침수해석. 한국지리정보학회지 13(1):74-88).
  10. Hall, J.W., S. Tarantola, P.D. Bates and M.S. Horiitt. 2005. Distributed sensitivity analysis of flood inundation model calibration. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 131:117-126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:2(117)
  11. Horritt, M.S. 2006. A methodolgy for the validation of uncertain flood inundation models. Journal of Hydrology 326:153-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.10.027
  12. Horritt, M.S. and P.D. Bates. 2002. Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation. Journal of Hydrology 268:87-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00121-X
  13. Hunter, N.M., P.D. Bates, M.S. Horritt and M.D. Wilson. 2007. Simple spatiallydistributed models for predicting flood inundation: a review. Geomorphology 90:208-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.021
  14. Jung, C.G., H.K. Joh, Y.S. Yu, J.Y. Park and S.J. Kim. Study on damage reduction by flood inundation and the sediments by SWAT and HEC-RAS modeling of flow dynamics with watershed hydrology -for 27 july 2011 heavy storm event at GonjiamCheon watershed-. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers 54(2):87-94 (정충길, 조형경, 유영석, 박종윤, 김성준. 2012. SWAT 및 HEC-RAS 모형의 수문-수리 연계모델링을 통한 곤지암천 유역의 하천범람 및 토사유출 피해저감 연구 -2011년 7월 27일 국지성 폭우를 대상으로-. 한국농공학회논문집 54(2):87-94). https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2012.54.2.087
  15. Kang, H.S., S.Y. Cho and Y.I. Song. 2011. A study on flood storage plans of farmlands for extreme flood reduction. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association 44(10):787-795 (강형식, 조성윤, 송영일. 2011. 극한홍수 저감을 위한 농경지의 저류지화 방안 연구. 한국수자원학회논문집 44(10):787-795). https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2011.44.10.787
  16. Kang, S.M., M.J. Park, S.H. Kim and S.J. Kim. 2007. A study on the mitigation damage using flood inundation analysis model FLUMEN -for the part of Jinsicheon reach-. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineering 27(6B):583-590 (강수만, 박민지, 김상호, 김성준. 2007. 홍수범람해석모형을 이용한 침수피해 저감방안 연구 -진위천 하천구간을 대상으로-. 대한토목학회논문집 27(6B):583-590).
  17. Kim, B.H., S.Y. Choi and K.Y. Han. 2011. An analysis method of 1D hydrodynamic model based on GIS for flood inundation mapping. Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation 11(6):227-235 (김병현, 최승용, 한건연. 2011. 홍수범람지도 작성을 위한 GIS기반 1차원 동역학적 해석기법. 한국방재학회논문집 11(6):227-235). https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2011.11.6.227
  18. Kim, S.J., S.J. Hong, B.M. Yoon and U. Ji. 2012. Feasibility analysis of HEC-RAS for unsteady flow simulation in the stream channel with a side-weir detection basin. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association 45(5):495-503 (김서준, 홍상진, 윤병만, 지운. 2012. 강변저류지가 있는 하도에서의 부정류 흐름 모의를 위한 HEC-RAS의 적용성 검토. 한국수자원학회논문집 45(5):495-503). https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2012.45.5.495
  19. Korea Environment Institute. 2009. Fundamental research on costal landward boundaries integrated flood forecasting methods according to the climate change (한국환경정책.평가연구원. 2009. 기후변화에 따른 연안역의 해역-육역 통합 범람 예측 방안에 관한 기초 연구: 해석모형 비교.분석을 중심으로).
  20. Lee, D.E., H.U. An, G.H. Lee and K.S. Jung. 2013. Application evaluation of flood inundation analysis using quadtree grid-based model. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association 46(6):655-666 (이대업, 안현욱, 이기하, 정관수. 2013. 쿼드트리 격자기반 모형의 홍수범람 해석 적용성 평가. 한국수자원학회논문집 46(6):655-666). https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2013.46.6.655
  21. Lee, J.H., J.J. Choi, H.C. Lee and E.T. Lee. 2003. Mapping of floodplain boundaries using high spatial resolution DEM. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineering 23(6B):471-478 (이주헌, 최종진, 이희철, 이은태. 2003. 고해상도 수치고도모형을 활용한 홍수범람도의 작성. 대한토목학회논문집 23(6B):471-478).
  22. Lee, J.T. and K.Y. Han. 1989. A forecasting model for the flooded area fesulting from breached levee. Journal of Korean Association of Hydrological Sciences 22(2):223-231 (이종태, 한건연. 1989. 하천제방의 붕괴로 인한 제내지의 침수예측 모형. 한국수문학회지 22(2):223-231).
  23. MLTM(Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime). 2008. Guidance on flood risk mapping (국토해양부. 2008. 홍수위험지도 제작에 관한 지침).
  24. MLTM(Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime). 2009. River design criteria․ explanation (국토해양부. 2009. 하천설계기준.해설).
  25. MLTM(Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime). 2011. Cheongmi-cheon(Riv.) river maintenance master plan report (국토해양부. 2011. 청미천 하천정비기본계획보고서).
  26. National Emergency Management Agency. 2005. Anual disaster report in 2003 (소방방재청. 2005. 2003년 재해연보).
  27. National Emergency Management Agency. 2011. Anual disaster report in 2010 (소방방재청. 2011. 2010년 재해연보).
  28. National Geographic Information Institute. 2006. Multi-dimentional spatial information costruction project (국토지리정보원. 2006. 다차원 디지털 공간정보구축표준 매뉴얼).
  29. Pappenberger, F., K. Frodsham, K. Beven, R. Romanowicz and P. Matgen. 2007. Fuzzy set approach to calibrating distributed flood inundation models using remote sensing observation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 11(2):739-752. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-739-2007
  30. Park, S.J., H.G. Choi, Y.H. Huh and K.Y. Han. 2011. Establishment and application of 2-dimensional flood inundation analysis system by the collaboration of river and lowland in Nam river basin. Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation 11(6):237-247 (박세진, 최현구, 허윤형, 한건연. 2011. 하천과 제내지를 연계한 2차원 홍수 범람 해석체계 구축 및 남강유역에의 적용. 한국방재학회논문집 11(6):237-247).
  31. Shim, J.M.. and S.B. Lee. 2006. The study of flood simulations using LiDAR data. The Journal of Korean Society for Geographiccal Information System 14(4):53-60 (심정민, 이석배. 2006. LiDAR 자료를 이용한 홍수 시뮬레이션에 관한 연구. 한국지형공간정보학회지 14(4):53-60).
  32. Yu, J.H., H.J. Kim and Y.S. Cho. 2005. Development of a combined model for flood inundation simulation. Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation 5(4):1-8 (유재홍, 김형준, 조용식. 2005. 홍수범람모의를 위한 내외수 연계모형 개발. 한국방재학회논문집 5(4):1-8).

Cited by

  1. Development of probability wind speed map based on frequency analysis vol.24, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-016-0054-6