DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

외상력이 없는 주관절에서 활차 내측 골극과 주관절 굴곡 제한과의 관계

Relationship of Trochlear Medial Facet Osteophyte to Elbow Flexion in Elbow Joint without Trauma History

  • 김병성 (순천향대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 박성용 (순천향대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 박강희 (순천향대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 송현석 (순천향대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 김형태 (순천향대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 윤홍기 (순천향대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 노재휘 (순천향대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실)
  • Kim, Byung Sung (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Bucheon Hospital) ;
  • Park, SungYong (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Bucheon Hospital) ;
  • Park, Kang Hee (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Bucheon Hospital) ;
  • Song, Hyun Seok (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Bucheon Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Hyung Tae (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Bucheon Hospital) ;
  • Yoon, Hong Kee (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Bucheon Hospital) ;
  • Nho, Jae Hwi (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Bucheon Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2012.07.06
  • 심사 : 2013.09.25
  • 발행 : 2013.12.31

초록

목적: 외상력이 없는 주관절에서 척골 근위부 활차 내측 관절면 골극의 크기가 주관절 굴곡에 미치는 영향을 분석하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 주관절부 컴퓨터 단층촬영을 시행한 외상력이 없는 환자 25예를 대상으로 연구를 시행하였다. 컴퓨터 단층촬영상 구상돌기 및 구상와, 주두 돌기 및 주두와 골극의 유무와 크기를 측정하였고, 그리고 활차 내측 관절면의 골극의 높이와 길이를 측정하였다. 결과: 주관절 굴곡 구축은 평균 $18.6^{\circ}$, 후속 굴곡은 평균 $112.1^{\circ}$ 였다. 활차 내측 관절면 골극의 높이는 평균 2.2 mm, 길이는 평균 4.7 mm이었다. 후속 굴곡 각도는 구상 돌기나 구상와에 골극 또는 유리체가 있었던 경우(n=14)가 $105.1^{\circ}$, 없었던 경우(n=11)가 $119.1^{\circ}$ (p=0.011)로 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다. 후속 굴곡 각도와 활차 내측 관절면 골극의 평균 길이와의 편상관계수는 0.687 (p<0.000)이었다. 결론: 활차 내측 관절면 골극의 길이가 긴 주관절에서 후속 굴곡 각도가 줄어들었다.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between trochlear medial facet osteophyte (TMFO) and elbow flexion in the elbow joints without trauma history. Materials and Methods: Twenty five patients, who underwent computed tomography without elbow trauma history, were reviewed. Patients were checked for osteophyte or loose bodies in the coronoid and olecranon sides. The height and length of TMFO were measured. Results: The average elbow flexion contracture was $18.6^{\circ}$, and further flexion was $112.1^{\circ}$. The TMFO height and length was 2.2 mm and 4.7 mm, respectively. The average elbow further flexion was $105.1^{\circ}$ in the coronoid block group (n=14) and $119.1^{\circ}$ (p=0.011) in the coronoid free group (n=11). The relationship between further elbow flexion and TMFO was significant with a partial correlation coefficient of 0.687(p<0.000) in the TMFO length. Conclusion: Elbow joints with longer TMFO length decrease further flexion.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Song HS, Yoon HM. Pathophysiology of stiff elbow. Clin Shoulder Elbow Soc. 2010;13:286-92. https://doi.org/10.5397/CiSE.2010.13.2.286
  2. Zimmerman NB. Clinical application of advances in elbow and forearm anatomy and biomechanics. Hand Clin. 2002;18:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0712(02)00010-0
  3. Yagi M, Yamanaka K, Yoshida K, Sato N, Inoue A. Successful manual reduction of locked metacarpophalangeal joints in fingers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:366-71. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200003000-00007
  4. Morrey BF. Surgical treatment of extraarticular elbow contracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 200;370: 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200001000-00007
  5. Viola RW, Hastings H 2nd. Treatment of ectopic ossification about the elbow. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 200;370:65-86. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200001000-00008
  6. Brouwer KM, Lindenhovius AL, de Witte PB, Jupiter JB, Ring D. Resection of heterotopic ossification of the elbow: a comparison of ankylosis and partial restriction. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35:1115-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.03.040
  7. Lindenhovius AL, Linzel DS, Doornberg JN, Ring DC, Jupiter JB. Comparison of elbow contracture release in elbows with and without heterotopic ossification restricting motion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:621-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.01.005
  8. SJ Cheon, DH Lee, SH Cha, HT Kim, JT Suh. Debridement arthroplasty using posteromedial approach in elbow joint with pain and bony limitation of motion. J Korean Shoulder Elbow Soc. 2009; 12:67-75. https://doi.org/10.5397/CiSE.2009.12.1.067
  9. MJ Park, MJ Chang, YB Lee, HJ Kang. Surgical release for posttraumatic loss of elbow flexion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2692-9. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.01367
  10. Waldt S, Bruegel M, Ganter K, et al. Comparison of multislice CT arthrography and MR arthrography for the detection of articular cartilage lesions of the elbow. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:784-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2585-9
  11. Dubberley JH, Faber KJ, Patterson SD, et al. The detection of loose bodies in the elbow: the value of MRI and CT arthrography. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:684-86. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.8703.top
  12. Fritz RC, Breidahl WH. Radiographic and special studies: recent advances in imaging of the elbow. Clin Sports Med. 2004;23:567-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2004.04.009
  13. Libicher M, Freyschmidt J. Radiological diagnosis in contracted elbow joint. Value of CT and MRI. Orthopade. 2001;30:593-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001320170046