Journal of Navigation and Port Research (한국항해항만학회지)

Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research (한국항해항만학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Legal Party and its Extent of the Demurrage

체선료의 책임주체와 그 범위에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Myung-Jae (Division of International Maritime Transport Science, Mokpo National Maritime University)
  • 김명재 (목포해양대학교 국제해사수송과학부)
  • Received : 2013.10.04
  • Accepted : 2013.11.28
  • Published : 2013.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The demurrage is regarded as a kind of the ocean freight and a remuneration of the time lost for the vessel while in port. In ordinary occasions of the voyage charter, the liability of a demurrage is usually laid on the charterers unless any exceptions are incorporated. The owners are, however, often meeting somehow difficulty to secure demurrage in the field as the liability is limited or transferred to a third party from the charterers. This paper is focused on clearing the liabilities to be held by the parties involved through the English Law cases, and what's more is rendering a proper suggestions to the owners and charterers on dealing with the ship's operation business.

체선료는 운임의 일종으로서 항만에서 선박의 체항에 따른 시간적 손실에 대한 보상이다. 통상적인 항해용선계약에 따르면 체선료의 책임은 반대의 문언이 없는 한 용선자에게 있는 것으로 추정된다. 그러나 실무에서는 용선자의 책임이 제한되거나 송하인 또는 수하인 등 제3자에게 이전되어 선주가 체선료 확보에 어려운 상황에 직면하게 되는 경우가 빈번하게 발생되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 용선자, 송하인, 수하인, 선하증권의 배서인, 기타 이해당사자 간의 체선료지불 책임에 관한 문제를 영미법의 사례를 중심으로 살펴보고, 그 결과에 따른 시사점을 도출하여 선주나 용선자의 실무에 도움이 되는 방안을 제시한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim M. J.(2012), "A Study on the Charterer's Duty & Right in Applying Laytimes of the Voyage Charterparty," Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 83-104.
  2. Park K. S. and Yang J. H.(2006), "The Factors of Laytime Commencement in the Voyage Charterparty," Journal of the Korea Maritime Law, Vol. 28, No.1 pp. 277-293.
  3. Bae B. T.(1979), "Law Matters of the Wharfage Request," Journal of the Korea Maritime Law, Vol. 28. No.1, pp. 65-90.
  4. Sa K. H. and Choi S. B.(2009), "Empirical Study on the Congestion of Bulk Ships- Focus on the Queuing Time for Berthing" The Association Journal of Shipping and Logistics," Vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 263-284.
  5. Jang Y. T. and Kim S. K.(1993), "A Study on the Estimation of the Ship's Time Cost in Port," The Association Journal of Shipping and Logistics," Vol. 16, pp. 229-259.
  6. Jang Y. T. and Seong S. K.(2002), "Revisit to Estimate the Time Cost of Ships and Cargoes," Journal of Navigation and port Research," Vol. 26, No.4. pp. 383-390. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2002.26.4.383
  7. H.an N. H.(2011), "A Study on the Laytime Commencement Effects before the Lay days-Front Commander Case-," Journal of Korea Institute of Maritime Law, Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 88-103.
  8. Oki I. M.(1993), Interpretation on Charterparty Practice. , Shoseidou. Tokyo, Japan.
  9. Oh H. K. and Kim J. K. . Ryoo D. K.. Kim M. J.(2013), Ship Chartering, Doonam, Seoul, pp.111-121.
  10. Nishitaku S. J. and Higsashi T. S.(2002), Interpretation on the Charterparty and Bill of Lading, Kaimondou, Tokkyo, Japan..
  11. Kokawa M.(1997), Tramper and Specialized Carrier-Big Core Carriers, Transport Research Institute, Shouseidou, Tokyo, Japan..
  12. Japan Mariner's Association(1983), Charterparty and Carriages of Sea, Shouseidou, Tokyo, Japan..
  13. Tsuda K. l.(1986), Legal Interpretation on the Chartterparty, Shouseidou, Tokyo, Japan.
  14. Allen v. Coltart & Co. (1883) 11 Q. B. 782; 52 L J Q. B.686; 48 L. T. 944.
  15. Cawthron v. Trickett(1864) 15 C. B. (N. S.) 754; 3 New Rep, 383; 33 L. J. C. P. 182; 9 L. T. 609;
  16. Davies Donald et. al.(1998), Commencement of Laytime, Third Ed., LLP.
  17. Dockray M.(2004), Cases and Materials on the Carriage of Goods by Sea, Third Ed., Cavendish.
  18. Evans v. Forster(1830), 1 B. & Ad. 118; L. & Welsb. 285; 8 L. J. (O. S.) K. B. 348; 109 E. R. 731.
  19. Francesco v. Massey(1873) L. R. 8 Exch. 101; 42 L. J. Ex. 75; 21 W. R. 440.
  20. Goss R. O. and Mann, M. C.(1977), The Cost of Ship's Time, Cambridge University.
  21. Julian Coke et. al.(1993), Voyage Charters, London.
  22. John Schofield(1990), Laytime and Demurrage, London.
  23. Jesson v. Solly(1811) 4 Taunt. 52; 128 E. R. 247.
  24. Kruger & Co. Ltd. v Moel Tryvan Ship Co. Ltd.(1907) A. C. 272; 76 L. J. K. B. 985; 97 L. T. 143.
  25. Kish & Cory(1875) L. R. 10 Q. B. 553; 44 L. J. Q. B. 205; 32 L. T. 670; 23 W. R. 880; 2 Asp. M. L. C. 593.
  26. Lickbarrow v. Mason(1794) 4 Bro. P. C. 57; 6 East 22n.; 2 E. R. 39.
  27. Lloyd's Rep. 379(1968), Navico A. G. v. Vrontados Naftiki Etairia P. E. 9-01, 9-55.
  28. Lloyd's Rep. 123 C. A(1979), George Veflings Rederi A/S v. President of India.
  29. Lloyd's Rep. 246(1963); Affirmed 2 Lloyd's Rep.(113. C. A. Fidelitgas Shipping Co., Ltd. v. V/O Exportchleb.
  30. Lewis v. Louis Dreyfus & Company(1926) 24 Ll. L. R. 333 v. M'kee(1868) L. R. 4 Ex. 58; 38 L. J. Exp. 62; 19 L. T. 522; 17 W. R. 325.
  31. Michael B. S.(1982), Laytime, London.
  32. Smurthwaite v. Wikins(1862) 11 C. B. (N. S.) 842; 31 L. J. C. P. 214; 5 L T. 842.
  33. Sanders v. Vanzeller(1843) 4. Q. B. 260; 3 Gal. & Dav. 580; 11 L. J. Q. B. 261. 12 L. J. Ex. 497; 114 E. R. 897.
  34. William V. Packard(1989), Laytime Calculating, London.
  35. Wilson J. F.(2005), Carriage of Goods by Sea, Fifth Ed., Longman.
  36. Wolff v. Horncastle(1798) 1 B. & P. 316.
  37. Wegner v. Smith(1854) 15 C. B. 285; 3 C. L. R. 47; 24 L. J. C. P. 25; 24 L. T.(O. S.) 76; 139 E. R. 432.