Journal of Gifted/Talented Education (영재교육연구)

The Korean Society for the Gifted (한국영재학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Learning Characteristics and Tactics of a Scientifically Gifted Student with Economic Difficulty and Physical Disadvantage: A Case Study of 'Haneul' of Saturday Physics Class

경제적, 신체적 어려움이 있는 과학영재의 학습 특성과 전술: 주말 물리교실 하늘이의 사례를 중심으로

  • Received : 2012.08.27
  • Accepted : 2012.09.26
  • Published : 2012.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As an effort to understand alienated gifted students, we investigated learning characteristics and learning tactics of a scientifically gifted student with economic difficulty and physical disadvantage. The student we studied is attending the Saturday Physics Class which is an after school science activity offered by our university. We adopted techniques of qualitative case study. Participant observation was carried out at the field and the interview was done with the participant, his mother, and his teacher of 5th grade. Field documents and self-reports were used to understand the student synthetically. As a result, learning characteristics of the participant could be summarized as a spontaneous learning which originated from the internal motivation and struggle for learning to overcome the sense of inferiority and isolation from the peers. The participant adopted a strategic method for learning to satisfy his learning desire given the circumstance of socioeconomic and physical disadvantage: the three tactics we found were various learning routes, meta-cognitive ability and fervent response.

우리나라의 소외된 영재를 이해하기 위한 노력의 일환으로 질적 사례연구 기법을 적용하여 가난하고 신체적 아픔이 있는 과학영재의 학습 특성과 전술에 대해 알아보았다. 이를 위해 연구 현장인 주말 물리교실을 중심으로 참여관찰을 했고, 참여자와 참여자의 어머니, 초등학교 5학년 때 담임교사와 면담을 진행하였다. 또한 현지문헌과 자기보고서를 추가로 활용하여 참여자를 종합적으로 이해하고자 했다. 그 결과, 참여자의 학습 특성은 내적동기와 열등감에서 기인하는 '능동적인 학습'과 배척된 관계 속에서 드러나는 '배움을 향한 몸부림'으로 정리할 수 있었다. 참여자의 학습 전술은 경제적 여력이 충분하지 않은 상태에서 배움에 대한 욕구를 충족하기 위한 전략적인 수단으로 '다양한 학습 경로'과 '메타인지적 사고', 그리고 '맞장구치기'의 세 전술을 발견하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 가금영 (2007). 한국 사교육문화 연구. 박사학위논문. 한국학중앙연구원. 한국학대학원.
  2. 교육인적자원부 (2007). 제2차 영재교육진흥종합계획. http://www.mest.go.kr (검색일: 2012. 4. 25)
  3. 김미숙, 조석희, 윤초희, 진석언 (2004). 중학생 영재의 지적, 정의적 특성에 따른 효과적인 교수학습 전략 탐색. 수탁연구(CR 2004-40). 서울: 한국교육개발원.
  4. 김지은 (2008). 열등감과 학교생활적응: 성취목표와 자의식을 선행요인으로 하여. 석사학위논문. 한양대학교.
  5. 김혜숙, 한대동, 오경희 (2011). 중학생의 사교육 의존 의식과 문화에 관한 질적 연구. 열린교육연구, 19, 127-147.
  6. 남영호 (2006). 러시아 공장 작업장에서의 시간과 공간, 신체. 비교문화연구, 12(1), 43-49.
  7. 노은희 (2002). 청자의 맞장구 유형과 기능 연구. 화법연구, 4, 245-269.
  8. 서울특별시 ㄷ교육지원청 영재교육원(2011). ㄷ교육지원청 영재교육원 중등 영재교육대상자 선발요강. http://www.djedu.go.kr (검색일: 2012. 6. 1)
  9. 박숙희 (2009). 소외계층 영재교육. 영재와 영재교육, 8(3), 5-21.
  10. 조석희, 이미순, 황동주, 이현주 (2005). 소외계층 영재의 발굴 및 교육방안: 소외계층 영재의 가정 및 개인특성 분석. 수탁연구(CR 2005-64). 서울: 한국교육개발원.
  11. 조석희, 이미순, 정현철, 황동주, 이현주 (2006). 소외된 과학 영재의 발굴 및 교육방안: 교육 프로그램 효과 검증을 중심으로. 수탁연구(CR 2006-20). 서울: 한국교육개발원.
  12. 조용환 (1999). 질적 연구: 방법과 사례. 서울: 교육과학사.
  13. 통계청 (2011a). 소득 10분위별 가구당 가계수지(전국, 2인 이상). http://kosis.kr (검색일: 2012. 5. 29)
  14. 통계청 (2011b). 사교육비조사보고서. http://kosis.kr (검색일: 2012. 3. 8)
  15. Adler, A. (1979). Superiority and socal interest: A collection of later writings. H. L., & R. R. Ansbacher (Eds.). 3rd ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  16. Baldwin, A. Y. (1987). I'm black, but look at me, I am also gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(4), 180-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628703100410
  17. Barell, J. (1984). Reflective thinking and education for the gifted. Roeper Review, 6, 194-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198409552808
  18. Barell, J. (1991). Teaching for thoughtfulness. White Plains, NY: Longman.
  19. Benbow, C. P., & Arimand, O. (1990). Predictors of high academic achievement in mathematics and science by mathematically talented students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 28(3), 430-441.
  20. Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: Longmans Green.
  21. Borland, J. H., Schnur, R., & Wright, L. (2000). Economically disadvantaged students in a school for the academically gifted: A postpositivist inquiry into individual and family adjustment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(1), 13-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400103
  22. Callahan, C. M., Tomlinson, C. A., Moon, T. R., Tomchin, E. M., & Plucker, J. A. (1995). Project START: Using a Multiple Intelligences Model in identifying and promoting talent in higher-risk students. (Research Monograph 95136). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
  23. Cheng, P. (1993). Metacognition and giftedness: The state of the relationship. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629303700302
  24. Clark, B. (2008). Growing up Gifted: Developing the Potential of Children at Home and at School (7th Ed.). Merrill: Prentice Hall.
  25. Costa, A. L. (1986). Teaching for, of, and about thinking. In A. L. Costa (Eds.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking. Washington, DC: National Assessment of Educational Progress.
  26. Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the Gifted and Talented (6th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  27. Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1984). The role of insight in intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628402800203
  28. De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkely and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  29. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
  30. Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  31. Ellis, A., & MacLaren, C. (2005). Rational emotive behavior therapy: A therapist's guide (2nd Ed.). Atascadero: Impact Publishers.
  32. Herbert, T. P. (2000). Defining belief in self: Intelligent young men in an urban high school. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(2), 91-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620004400203
  33. Hollingworth, L. (1942). Children above IQ 180: Their origin and development. New York: World Books.
  34. Klineberg, O. (1963). Negro-white differences in intelligence test performance: A new look at an old problem. American Psychologist, 18, 198-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041515
  35. Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Grant, B., & Seibert, C. (1994). Social support systems and the disadvantaged gifted: A framework for developing programs and services. Roeper Review, 17, 20-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199409553612
  36. Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davision (Eds.), Conception of Giftedness (pp. 53-92). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  37. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  38. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
  39. Spradley, J. P. (1988). 문화연구를 위한 참여관찰방법 [이희봉 역]. 서울: 대한교과서.
  40. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  41. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York: Plume.
  42. Subotnik, R. F., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1997). Restructuring special programs to reflect the distinctions between children's and adult's experiences with giftedness. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 101-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.1997.9681868
  43. Uttal, D. H., Lummis, M., & Stevenson, H. W. (1988). Low and high mathematics achievement in Japanese, Chinese, and American elementary-school children. Developmental Psychology, 24, 335-342. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.3.335
  44. Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1989). The role of the family in the success of disadvantaged gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 22-36.
  45. Van Tassel-Baska, J., Johnson, D., & Avery, L. D. (2002). Using performance tasks in the identification of economically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners: Findings from project STAR. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46(2), 110-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620204600204
  46. Werner, E. (1989). Children of the garden island. Scientific American, 261, 106-111. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1089-106
  47. White, B. (1993). The first three years of life. New York: Prentice Hall Press.
  48. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.