Journal of Gifted/Talented Education (영재교육연구)

The Korean Society for the Gifted (한국영재학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Values of Scientifically Gifted Students and the Relations among Values

과학영재학생의 가치 특성 및 가치유형 간 상호 관계성 분석

  • Received : 2012.08.29
  • Accepted : 2012.09.24
  • Published : 2012.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Values can be regarded as an important factor which acts as an indicator showing each person's individual path of life. many researchers have suggested that values function as standards that guide thought and action. Values lead us to take particular positions on social issues and they predispose us to favor one perspective over another. Adolescence is an important period for the establishment of one's values. The values established during such a period become an important factor determining one's right personality and contents of life. In particular, it is important to take a study about the values possessed by gifted and talented children in Korea. There have been several researches regarding the cognitive and affective characteristics of gifted and talented learners in Korea. However, there has not been any research regarding their values in life. This study investigates the characteristics of values shown by 468 high-school students from two special schools for gifted students by using Schwartz's Value Survey Scale which is consisted of 57 value categories and 10 value types. According to the results of this study, the students from the special high-school for gifted children tend to promote such value types as 'autonomy' and 'stimulation' the most. Conversely, the same students tend to deny or ignore such value types as 'power' and 'tradition'. This study provides basic data regarding the values of gifted and talented students as the first research of its kind targeting gifted students in Korea. It has an important meaning for the research related to the characteristics shown by gifted students in Korea.

본 연구는 영재의 가치관을 분석하는 데 초점을 맞추고 있다. 신념체계로서의 가치관은 개인이나 조직의 행위 선택에 직접적인 영향을 미친다. 지금까지 영재의 인지적, 사회-정서적 특성에 관한 논의는 활발하였으나 그러한 특성을 표출하게끔 작용하는 영재의 가치 혹은 신념에 관한 분석은 미흡한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 국내 2개 과학영재학교 468명을 대상으로 Schwartz의 가치조사척도를 사용하여 10개 문항 유형의 57개 가치범주에 대해 조사를 실시하였다. 그 결과 과학영재들은 '전통'이나 '권력' 등의 가치보다는 '자율', '자극', '성취' 등과 같이 영재의 일반적인 공통 특징과 일관되는 가치들을 보다 중요시하는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 구남득 (1994). 남녀 중학생의 자아개념과 가치관에 관한 조사연구. 석사학위논문. 인천대학교대학원.
  2. 권오인 (2002). 한.일 청소년 가치관의 비교 연구. 경기대학교 대학원논문집, 29, 40.
  3. 김연신, 최한나 (2009). Schwartz의 보편적 가치 이론의 적용 타당성 연구: 한국대학생을 대상으로. 한국심리학회지, 23(1), 1-16.
  4. 김유리 (2011). 청소년의 학업성취도와 주관적 안녕감에 따른 집단별 특성: 기대가치신념과 낙관주의를 중심으로. 석사학위논문. 중앙대학교대학원.
  5. 윤여홍 (1996). 영재아동의 정서적 특성에 관한 임상연구; 정신 건강을 위한 지도. 영재교육연구, 6, 53-71.
  6. 이운형 (2004). 청소년의 가치관. 학생생활연구, 19, 1-2.
  7. 임희섭 (1987). 사회변동과 가치관. 서울: 정음사.
  8. 정범모 (1972). 가치관과 교육. 서울: 배영사.
  9. 정혜섭 (2000). 가치관이 학업성취도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문. 서울대학교 대학원.
  10. 주영현 (2012). 한국 과학영재고등학생의 가치관 조사. 석사학위논문. 경남대학교교육대학원.
  11. 최호성 (2003). 중등 영재판별과 교육 프로그램의 비판적 검토. 한국영재학회 추계 학술대회 논문집, 91-115.
  12. 최호성 (2009). 영재판별의 재음미. 과학창의, 141, 12-14.
  13. 최호성 (2010). 영재성 판별 도구의 개발과 적용. 연구보고서. 부산: 부산광역시영재교육진흥원.
  14. 최호성 (2010). 관찰추천제에 의한 영재교육 대상자 선발 도구 개발. 정책연구보고서. 창원: 경상남도교육청.
  15. Clark, B. (2002). Growing up gifted. (6th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
  16. Colangelo, N., & Kelly, K. R. (1983). A study of student, parent, and teacher attitudes toward gifted programs and gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 107-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628302700302
  17. Dabrowski, K. (1972). Psychoneurosis is not all an illness. London: Gryf.
  18. Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented. (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  19. Dollinger, S. J., Burke, B. A., & Gump, N. W. (2007). Creativity and Values. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701395028
  20. Dollinger, S. J., Leong, F. T., & Ulicni. S. K. (1996). On traits and values: With special reference to openness to experience. Journal of Research in Personality. 30, 23-41. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1996.0002
  21. Feather, N. T. (2002). Values and value dilemmas in relation to judgements concerning outcomes of an industrial conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 446-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202287003
  22. Galbriath, J. (1983). The Gifted Kids Survival Guides. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing Co.
  23. Kahle, L. R., Beatty, S. E., & Homer, P. (1986). After-native measurement approaches to consumer values: The list of values and values and life style. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 405-409. https://doi.org/10.1086/209079
  24. Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Value and value orientation in the theory of action, an exploration on definition and classification. Toward general theory of action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  25. Lindeman, M., & Verkasalo, M. (2010). Measuring values with the short Schwartz's value survey. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85(2), 170-178.
  26. Moon, S. M. (2009). Theories to guide affective curriculum development. In J. L., VanTassel-Baska, T. L., Cross, & F. R., Olenchak (Eds.). Social-emotional Curriculum with Gifted and Talented Students (pp. 11-39). The Critical issues in Equity and Excellence in Gifted Education Series. Waco, Texas: Prufrock Press Inc.
  27. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness: Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184.
  28. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes and values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  29. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
  30. Sagiv, L. (2002). Vocational interests and basic values. Journal of Career Assessment, 10, 233-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072702010002007
  31. Schmitz, C. C., & Galbraith, J. (1985). Managing the social and emotional needs of the gifted: A teacher's survival guide. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.
  32. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  33. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45.
  34. Schwartz, S., & Bardi, A. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519-542.
  35. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-562. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550
  36. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of value: Extension and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878-891. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.878
  37. Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(1), 92-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022195261007
  38. Schwartz, S., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032005001
  39. Silverman, L. K. (1993). Counselling the gifted and talented. Denver, CO: Love.
  40. Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Intelligence and wisdom. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Intelligence (pp. 631-649). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  41. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York, NY: Macmillan Pub. Co.
  42. Walberg, H. J., Tsai, S., Weinstein, T., Gabriel, C. L., Rasher, S. P., Rosecrans, T., & Vukosavich, P. (1981). Childhood traits and environmental conditions of highly eminent adults. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 103-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628102500303