DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimation of Polar Cap Potential and the Role of PC Index

  • Received : 2012.08.10
  • Accepted : 2012.08.24
  • Published : 2012.09.15

Abstract

Polar cap potential has long been considered as an indicator for the amount of energy flowing in the magnetosphere-ionosphere system. Thus, the estimation of polar cap potential is important to understand the physical process of the magnetosphere. To estimate the polar cap potential in the Northern Hemisphere, merging electric field by Kan & Lee (1979) is adopted. Relationships between the PC index and calculated merging electric field ($E^*$) are examined during full-time and storm-time periods separately. For this purpose Dst, AL, and PC indices and solar wind data are utilized during the period from 1996-2003. From this linear relationship, polar cap potential (${\Phi}^*$) is estimated using the formula by Doyle & Burke (1983). The values are represented as $58.1{\pm}26.9$ kV for the full-time period and $123.7{\pm}84.1$ kV for a storm-time period separately. Considering that the average value of polar cap potential of Doyle & Burke (1983) is about 47 kV during moderately quiet intervals with the S3-2 measurements, these results are similar to such. The monthly averaged variation of Dst, AL, and PC indices are then compared. The Dst and AL indices show distinct characteristics with peaks during equinoctial season whereas the average PC index according to the month shows higher values in autumn than in spring. The monthly variations of the linear correlation coefficients between solar wind parameters and geomagnetic indices are also examined. The PC-AL linear correlation coefficient is highest, being 0.82 with peaks during the equinoctial season. As with the AL index, the PC index may also prove useful for predicting the intensity of an auroral substorm. Generally, the linear correlation coefficients are shown low in summer due to conductance differences and other factors. To assess the role of the PC index during the recovery phase of a storm, the relation between the cumulative PC index and the duration is examined. Although the correlation coefficient lowers with the storm size, it is clear that the average correlation coefficient is high. There is a tendency that duration of the recovery phase is longer as the PC index increases.

Keywords

References

  1. Borovsky JE, Denton MH, Differences between CME-driven storms and CIR-driven storms, JGR, 111, 11447-11463 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011447
  2. Chun FK, Knipp DJ, McHarg MG, Lacey JR, Lu G, et al., Joule heating patterns as a function of polar cap index, 107, 1119-1127(2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/ 2001JA000246
  3. Cliver EW, Kamide Y, Ling AG, Mountains versus valleys: semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity, 105, 2413- 2424 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999JA900439
  4. Doyle MA, Burke WJ, S3-2 Measurements of the polar cap potential, JGR, 88, 9125-9133 (1983). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JA088iA11p09125
  5. Kan JR, Lee LC, Energy coupling function and solar windmagnetosphere dynamo, GeoRL, 6, 577-580 (1979). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/GL006i007p00577
  6. Lyatskaya S, Lyatsky W, Khazanov GV, Relationship between substorm activity and magnetic disturbances in two polar caps, GeoRL, 35, L20104 (2008). http://dx.doi. org/10.1029/2008GL035187
  7. McCreadie H, Menvielle M, The PC index: review of methods, AnGeo, 28, 1887-1903 (2010). http://dx.doi. org/10.5194/angeo-28-1887-2010
  8. Nagatsuma T, Conductivity dependence of cross-polar potential saturation, JGR, 109, A04210 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010286
  9. Perreault P, Akasofu S-I, A study of geomagnetic storms, GeoJ, 54, 547-573 (1978). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1365-246X.1978.tb05494.x
  10. Ridley AJ, Kihn EA, Polar cap index comparisons with AMIE cross polar cap potential, electric field, and polar cap area, GeoRL, 31, L07801 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GL019113
  11. Russell CT, McPherron RL, Semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity, JGR, 78, 92-108 (1973). http:// dx.doi.org/10.1029/JA078i001p00092
  12. Takalo J, Timonen J, On the relation of the AE and PC indices, JGR, 103, 29393-29398 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98JA02390
  13. Troshichev O, Hayakawa H, Matsuoka A, Mukai T, Tsuruda K, Cross polar cap diameter and voltage as a function of PC index and interplanetary quantities, JGR, 101, 13429-13436 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/95JA03672
  14. Troshichev O, Janzhura A, Relationship between the PC and AL indices during repetitive bay-like magnetic disturbances in the auroral zone, JASTP, 71, 1340-1352 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.05.017
  15. Troshichev OA, Andrezen VG, The relationship between interplanetary quantities and magnetic activity in the southern polar cap, P&SS 33, 415-419 (1985). http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(85)90086-8
  16. Troshichev OA, Andrezen VG, Vennerstrom S, Friis- Christensen E, Magnetic activity in the polar cap--a new index, P&SS, 36, 1095-1102 (1988). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(88)90063-3
  17. Troshichev OA, Kuznetsov BM, Dmitrieva NP, Polar cap magnetic activity as a signature of substorm development, P&SS, 27, 217-221 (1979). http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/0032-0633(79)90063-1
  18. Troshichev OA, Lukianova RY, Relation of PC index to the solar wind parameters and substorm activity in time of magnetic storms, JASTP, 64, 585-591 (2002). http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00016-0
  19. Troshichev OA, Lukianova RY, Papitashvili VO, Rich FJ, Rasmussen O, Polar cap index (PC) as a proxy for ionospheric electric field in the near-pole region, GeoRL, 27, 3809-3812(2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000GL003756
  20. Vennerstrom S, Friis-Christensen E, Troshichev OA, Andresen VG, Comparison between the polar cap index PC and the auroralelectrojetindicies AE, AL, and AU, JGR, 96, 101-113 (1991). http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/90JA01975

Cited by

  1. Analysis of supersubstorm events with reference to polar cap potential and polar cap index vol.4, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EA000217
  2. Study of interplanetary parameters, polar cap potential, and polar cap index during quiet event and high intensity long duration continuous AE activities (HILDCAAs) vol.18, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2205/2018ES000609