The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of three different orthodontic wires for bonded lingual retainer fabrication

  • Baysal, Asli (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University) ;
  • Uysal, Tancan (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University) ;
  • Gul, Nisa (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University) ;
  • Alan, Melike Busra (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University) ;
  • Ramoglu, Sabri Ilhan (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University)
  • Received : 2011.07.11
  • Accepted : 2011.12.06
  • Published : 2012.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated the detachment force, amount of deformation, fracture mode, and pull-out force of 3 different wires used for bonded lingual retainer fabrication. Methods: We tested 0.0215-inch five-stranded wire (PentaOne, Masel; group I), $0.016{\times}0.022$-inch dead-soft eight-braided wire (Bond-A-Braid, Reliance; group II), and 0.0195-inch dead-soft coaxial wire (Respond, Ormco; group III). To test detachment force, deformation, and fracture mode, we embedded 94 lower incisor teeth in acrylic blocks in pairs. Retainer wires were bonded to the teeth and vertically directed force was applied to the wire. To test pull-out force, wires were embedded in composite that was placed in a hole at the center of an acrylic block. Tensile force was applied along the long axis of the wire. Results: Detachment force and mode of fracture were not different between groups. Deformation was significantly higher in groups II and III than in group I (p < 0.001). Mean pull-out force was significantly higher for group I compared to groups II and III (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Detachment force and fracture mode were similar for all wires, but greater deformations were seen in dead-soft wires. Wire pull-out force was significantly higher for five-stranded coaxial wire than for the other wires tested. Five-stranded coaxial wires are suggested for use in bonded lingual retainers.

Keywords

References

  1. Sinclair PM, Little RM. Maturation of untreated normal occlusions. Am J Orthod 1983;83:114-23.
  2. Bishara SE, Treder JE, Damon P, Olsen M. Changes in the dental arches and dentition between 25 and 45 years of age. Angle Orthod 1996;66:417-22.
  3. Little RM, Wallen TR, Riedel RA. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1981;80:349-65.
  4. Parker WS. Retention--retainers may be forever. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95:505-13.
  5. Durbin DD. Relapse and the need for permanent fixed retention. J Clin Orthod 2001;35:723-7.
  6. Cerny R. Permanent fixed lingual retention. J Clin Orthod 2001;35:728-32.
  7. Booth FA, Edelman JM, Proffit WR. Twenty-year follow-up of patients with permanently bonded mandi bular canine-to-canine retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:70-6.
  8. Dahl EH, Zachrisson BU. Long-term experience with direct-bonded lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod 1991;25:619-30.
  9. Zachrisson BU. The bonded lingual retainer and multiple spacing of anterior teeth. Swed Dent J Suppl 1982;15:247-55.
  10. Bryan DC, Sherriff M. An in vitro comparison between a bonded retainer system and a directly bonded flexible spiral wire retainer. Eur J Orthod 1995;17:143-51.
  11. Bearn DR. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:207-13.
  12. Cooke ME, Sherriff M. Debonding force and deformation of two multi-stranded lingual retainer wires bonded to incisor enamel: an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:741-6.
  13. Artun J, Urbye KS. The effect of orthodontic treatment on periodontal bone support in patients with advanced loss of marginal periodontium. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93:143-8.
  14. Bearn DR, McCabe JF, Gordon PH, Aird JC. Bonded orthodontic retainers: the wire-composite interface. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:67-74.
  15. Lumsden KW, Saidler G, McColl JH. Breakage incidence with direct-bonded lingual retainers. Br J Orthod 1999;26:191-4.
  16. Lie Sam Foek DJ, Ozcan M, Verkerke GJ, Sandham A, Dijkstra PU. Survival of flexible, braided, bonded stainless steel lingual retainers: a historic cohort study. Eur J Orthod 2008;30:199-204.
  17. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40.
  18. Oliver RG. The effect of different methods of bracket removal on the amount of residual adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93:196-200.
  19. Al Yami EA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, van't Hof MA. Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome: follow-up until 10 years postretention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:300-4.
  20. Aldrees AM, Al-Mutairi TK, Hakami ZW, Al-Malki MM. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a comparison of initial bond strength of diff erent wire-and-composite combinations. J Orofac Orthop 2010;71:290-9.
  21. Zachrisson BU. Long-term experience with directbonded retainers: update and clinical advice. J Clin Orthod 2007;41:728-37.
  22. Radlanski RJ, Zain ND. Stability of the bonded lingual wire retainer-a study of the initial bond strength. J Orofac Orthop 2004;65:321-35.
  23. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975;2:171-8.

Cited by

  1. The acrylic's design or the addition of internal orthodontic wire changes the resistance of orthodontic plates? vol.42, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1590/s1807-25772013000600010
  2. Shear Bond Strength of Four Types of Orthodontic Retainers after Thermocycling and Cyclic Loading vol.2021, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9424040
  3. Side effects of twistflex retainers-3D evaluation of tooth movement after retainer debonding vol.82, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-020-00265-z
  4. The Effect of Material Type and Location of an Orthodontic Retainer in Resisting Axial or Buccal Forces vol.14, pp.9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092319
  5. The efficacy of polyether‐ether‐ketone wire as a retainer following orthodontic treatment vol.7, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.377
  6. Effect of Direct versus Indirect Bonding Technique on the Failure Rate of Mandibular Fixed Retainer-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.19, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2021.09.004