DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluating Energy Response of the Artificial Ground Motions Compatible with Seismic Design Spectrum

설계용 스펙트럼에 적합한 인공지진동의 에너지 응답특성의 평가

  • 전대한 (동서대 건축토목공학부) ;
  • 양창진 (동서대 건축토목공학부)
  • Received : 2012.02.29
  • Published : 2012.05.25

Abstract

It has long been recognized that energy input, absorption, and dissipation in seismic resistant design of structures are the most fundamental quantities controlling seismic performance. While the input energy($E_I$) is a reliable parameter for selecting the most demanding earthquake ground motion, it alone is not sufficient for proper seismic design of the structure. The importance of reliable estimation of the input energy of possible earthquake ground motions at the site of structure in order to select the proper design earthquake motion is emphasized. This paper discusses the characteristic of input energy concepts between the real recorded ground motion and the artificial ground motion in seismic resistant design of building structures. For long-period contents dominant earthquake ground motion, the input energy spectra are sensitive to the variation of the natural period of structures. It is concluded that the input energy quantities by the artificial ground motions used in this paper presented better stability than those by real recorded ground motions. Also, the artificial ground motions compatible with design spectrum are applicable as input ground motions for a seismic response analysis of building structures.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. Stewart, J.P., Chiou, S., Bray, J.D., Graves, R.W., Somerville, P.G., and Abrahamson, N.A., Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance-based design, PEER-2001/09, PEERC, University of California, 2001, pp.194-200.
  2. Housner, G.W., "Limit Design of Structures to Resist Earthquakes", Proceedings 1st WCEE, Berkeley, CA, 1956, pp.5-1-13.
  3. Uang C. M and Bertero, V.V., "Evaluation of Seismic Energy in Structures", Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.19, pp.77-90, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290190108
  4. Riddell R., "On Ground Motions Intensity Indices", Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp.147-173, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2424748
  5. 秋山宏, 北村春幸, "エネルギースペクトルと速度応答スペクトルの対応, 日本建築學會構造系論文集, 제608호, pp.37-42, 2006.
  6. 日本建築學會, 建築物の耐震性能評価手法の現狀と課題-限界耐力計算.エネルギー法.時刻歷應答解析, 東京, 技報堂出版, 2009, pp.43-51.
  7. 秋山宏, エネルギーの釣合に基づく建築物の耐震設計, 東京, 技報堂出版, 1999, pp.2-26.
  8. Naeim F. and Lew M., "On the Use of Design Spectrum Compatible Time Histories", Earthquake Spectra, Vo.11, No.1, pp.111-127, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585805
  9. Jun, Dae-Han, "Seismic Response of R/C Structures Subjected to Simulated Ground Motions Compatible with Design Spectrum", The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, Published online in Wiley Online Library(Wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI:10.1002/tal.658, 2010.
  10. 전대한, 강병두, 김재웅, "설계용 스펙트럼에 적합한 인공지진파에 의한 비선형 응답 특성의 분석", 한국지진공학회 논문집, 제10권 5호, 2006. 10. pp. 63-71.
  11. 김재관, 이동근, 구조동역학(Chapter 7), 제2판, 피어션에듀케인션코리아, 서울, pp.308-328, 2004.
  12. Bertero, V.V. and Uang C. M., "Issues and Future Directions in the Use of an Energy Approach for Seismic-Resistant Design of Structures", Nonlinear Seismic Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, edited by Fajfar, P. and Krawinkler, H., Elsevier Applied Science, 1992