Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of a method for calculating weights of evaluation criteria for proper selection of urban waterfronts

도심 친수공간 적지선정을 위한 평가기준의 가중치 산정방법 개발

  • Kim, Sung-Man (GwangJu Green Environment Center) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Choon (Yeongsan River Environment Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Park, Min-Jung (Department of Environmental Engineering, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kwon, Jai-Bum (Department of Environmental Engineering, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Woon (Department of Environmental Engineering, Chonnam National University)
  • 김성만 (광주녹색환경지원센터) ;
  • 이재춘 (국립환경과학원 영산강물환경연구소) ;
  • 박민정 (전남대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 권재범 (전남대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 이용운 (전남대학교 환경공학과)
  • Received : 2012.05.05
  • Accepted : 2012.07.22
  • Published : 2012.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The urban waterfront well created, could provide mental stability and comfort and also foster personality. In addition it could provide the calmness and rest of mind. Especially, recently the urban waterfronts are restored here and there and are created whenever developing a new town The purpose of this study is to develop a method of calculating the weight of each evaluation criterion for deciding the priority of restoration among for deciding the priority of restoration among the urban waterfronts. The method includes the analytic hierarchy process that can calculate the reasonable weight of each evaluation criterion, because the importance (weights) of evaluation criteria appears to be different among the evaluators; the results of this study can be summarized as that this method can be useful for calculating the weights of evaluation criteria, and also that the superiority of ecological resources is the most important factor (highest weight) in selecting the best waterfront, followed by accessibility, tourism vacation, and proximity to parks. And then the lowest factor in importance is the scale of reservoir.

Keywords

References

  1. 구로야나기 아키오, 와타나베 히데토시(저자), 김나영, 이한석(역자), 2011, 도시수변과 인간행동, 도서출판 선인.
  2. 권령민, 2008.12, 제조기업의 민첩성 향상을 위한 기업 자원역량 우선순위 분석, 경북대학교 박사학위논문.
  3. 김선미, 2009, 재이용수를 활용한 친수공간의 경제적 가치평가, 서울시립대학교 공학박사학위논문.
  4. 김성만, 2012, 다기준의사결정법(CP)을 이용한 도심 친수공간 적지선정 방법개발, 전남대학교 공학박사학위논문.
  5. 김윤주, 2008, 가중치 추출기법의 비교, 중앙대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
  6. 김정은, 박성제, 2007, 친수공간으로서의 워터프론트 개념과 활용방향, 물과미래, 40(5), 30-39.
  7. 김주환, 정남정, 김정현, 안창진, 2006, 배급수관망의 종합적 성능평가를 위한 의사결정 지원시스템, 한국수자원학회.
  8. 건설교통부, 2005, 지속가능한 신도시계획기준.
  9. 박명배, 남은우, 이해종, 신택수, 2008, 계층 분석적 의사결정방법(AHP)에 의한 건강도시 사업 평가기준의 우선순위 결정에 관한 연구, 한국보건교육건강증진학회.
  10. 방준호, 2009, 퍼지확률이론과 통계기법을 이용한 지하 암반공동에서의 스폴링 특성 평가, 고려대학교 박사학위논문.
  11. 안형기, 박용길, 2000, water-front 개발을 통한 환경친화적 도시발전 전략, 한국정책과학학회, 4(2).
  12. 이용구, 김삼용, 2008, 통계학의 이해, 율곡출판사
  13. 전승훈, 2007.5, 워터프론트와 친수공간적 활용, 물과 미래, 40(5).
  14. Bardossy, A., and Bogardi, I. (1983). "Network design for the spatial estimation of environmental variables." Applied Mathematics and Computation, 12, 339-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/0096-3003(83)90046-2
  15. Chen, S. H., 1985, Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 17(2), 113-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90050-8
  16. Da-Yong Chang, 1996, Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, European Journal of Operational Research 95, 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
  17. Jennefer Laidley, 2007, The ecosystem approach and the global imperative on Toronto's central Waterfront, ELSEVIER, 24(4), 259-272.
  18. Saaty, T. L, 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York, McGraw-Hill.
  19. Sharareh Pourebrahim, Mehrdad Hadipour, Mazlin Bin Mokhtar, Mohd Ibrahim Hj Mohamed, 2010, Ocean&Coastal Management, 53, 544-551.
  20. Ying-Ming Wang, Ying Luo, Zhongsheng Hua, 2008, On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications, European Journal of Operational Research 186, 735-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.050