Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science (한국산림과학회지)

Korean Society of Forest Science (한국산림과학회)
권호 표지

Development of Criteria for Evaluating Indonesia's REDD+ Strategy

인도네시아의 REDD+ 전략 평가를 위한 기준 개발

  • Bae, Jae Soo (Center for Forest and Climate Change, Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • 배재수 (국립산림과학원 기후변화연구센터)
  • Published : 2012.12.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

We developed four qualitative criteria for evaluating Indonesia's REDD+ strategy by analysing REDD+ related decisions from the Cancun agreements adopted by the 16th Conference of the Parties under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), and the important elements developed by Norway's International Climate and Forest Initiative to evaluate Indonesia's REDD+ strategy: (1) Criterion 1 is assessing how accurately the developed strategy identifies substantial underlying and direct causes of deforestation and forest degradation; (2) Criterion 2 is whether the strategy establishes a scientifically reliable national-level MRV (Measurement, Reporting and Verification) system; (3) Criterion 3 is whether the strategy achieves real greenhouse gas emissions reductions; and (4) Criterion 4 is whether the strategy includes safeguards to ensure equity and co-benefits from REDD+ related projects for relevant stakeholders, in particular local communities and indigenous peoples. Criteria 1 and 2 can be the fundamental bases of real GHG emissions reduction (Criteria 3). Criteria 3 is recognised as the ultimate objective of REDD+. Criterion 4 is for both bases of the effective GHG emission reduction and complementary objective of REDD+. These criteria and indicators developed can provide basic framework to understand their REDD+ national strategies of the other developing countries as well as Indonesia.

기후변화협약 제16차 당사국총회에서 결정된 칸쿤 합의문의 REDD+ 결정문과 노르웨이의 인도네시아 REDD+ 국가 전략을 평가하기 위한 중요 요소를 바탕으로 인도네시아의 REDD+ 전략을 사전에 평가하기 위한 4가지 정성적인 기준을 개발하였다. '산림전용 및 산림황폐화의 원인 규명'(평가기준 1)과 '국가 MRV 체계 수립'(평가기준 2)은 REDD+가 성공할 수 있는 토대이다. '실질적인 온실가스 감축'(평가기준 3)은 REDD+의 궁극적인 목적이고 지역주민 및 원주민의 권리를 보장하고 생물다양성을 보장하는 '안전장치의 보장'(평가기준 4)은 REDD+의 보완적인 목적이자 REDD+ 성공의 토대라 할 수 있다. 본 연구에서 개발한 REDD+ 평가를 위한 기준 및 지표는 인도네시아뿐만 아니라 개도국의 REDD+ 국가 전략을 이해하기 위한 기본 틀을 제공한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 배재수, 배기강. 2009. 개도국의 산림전용으로 인한 온실가스 배출량 감축 및 산림탄소축적증진 활동의 탄소 배출권 잠재력 평가. 한국임학회지 98(3): 263-271.
  2. 산림청. 2011. 기후변화 대응을 위한 REDD+ 추진전략 및 대책(2012-2016). pp. 44.
  3. Agrawal, A., Nepstad, D. and Chhatre, A. 2011. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. Annual Reviews of Envirionment and Resources 36(1): 373-396. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-042009-094508
  4. Cerbu, G.A., Swallow, B.M. and Thompson, D.Y. 2010. Locating REDD: A global survey and analysis of REDD readiness and demonstration activities. Environmental Science and Policy 14(2): 1-13.
  5. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). 2012. Advice on the Application of relevant REDD+ safeguards for biodiversity, and on possible indicators and potential mechanisms to assess impacts of REDD+ measures on biodiversity (UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/16/8). http://www.cbd. int/doc/meetings/sbstta/sbstta-16/official/sbstta-16-08-en.pdf(2012.4.23).
  6. Dewan Nasional Perubahan Iklim (DNPI). 2010. Indonesia's greenhouse gas abatement cost curve. Bogor, pp. 52. http://www.dnpi.go.id/report/DNPI-Media-Kit/reports/indonesia-ghg_abatement_cost_curve/Indonesia_ghg_cost_curve_english.pdf(2012.4.23.).
  7. Geist, H. and Lambin, E. 2001. What drives tropical deforestation? A mata-analysis of proximate and underlying causes of deforestation based on subnational case study evidence. Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC) Project. International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP). LUCC Report Series: 4.
  8. Intergovenmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Pachauri, R., Reisinger, A. (Eds.), Geneva, pp. 104. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_spm.pdf(2012.4.23.).
  9. Indonesian REDD+ Task Force. 2012. REDD+ National Strategy. Jakarta, Indonesia. pp. 40. http://www.satgasreddplus.org(2012.8.29.).
  10. Leitmann, J. et al., 2009. Investing in a more sustainable Indonesia: Country Environmental Analysis. CEA Series Report No. 50762-ID, East Asia and Pacific Region. Washington, DC. pp. 94. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/006D524F9C10B2B849257678001B1745-Full_Report.pdf(2012.4.23.).
  11. Letter of Intent (LOI) between the Government of the Kingdom of Norway and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia on "Cooperation on reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation". 2010. http://www.norway.or.id/PageFiles/404362/Letter_of_Intent_Norway_Indonesia_26_May_2010.pdf(2012.4.23.).
  12. Mather, A.S. 1992. The forest transition. Area 24(4): 367-379.
  13. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being Synthesis. Island Press. Washington, DC.
  14. Norad. 2011. Real-time evaluation of Norway's international climate and forest initiative: Contributions to National REDD+ Processes 2007-2010, Country Report: Indonesia, Evaluation Report 16/2010. Oslo, pp. 144.
  15. Phelps, J., Webb, E.L. and Agrawal, A. 2010b. Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance? Science 328: 312-313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187774
  16. Republic of Indonesia (ROI). 2011. REDD+: Strategi National REDDD+ (Final Draft for Online Public Disclosure). Jakarta, Indonesia. pp. 100. http://ukp.go.id/informasi-publik/cat_view/21-redd(2012.4.23.).
  17. Rudel, T.K., Coomes, O.T., Moran, E., Achard, F., Angelsen, A., Xu, J. and Lambin, E. 2005. Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of the land use change. Global Environmental Change 15: 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.11.001
  18. Simula, M. 2010. Analysis of REDD+ financing gaps and overlaps: REDD+ partnership. http://reddpluspartnership.org/65524/en/(2012.4.23.).
  19. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2007. Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries: approaches to stimulate action. FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1, pp. 8-11.
  20. UNFCCC. 2010. Decision 1/CP.16, The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention (FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1). http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdf#page=2(2012.4.23.).
  21. UNFCCC. 2011. Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/cop17/eng/09a01.pdf(2012.4.23.).
  22. United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010: Main report. FAO Forestry Paper No. 163. Rome, pp. 340.
  23. World Bank. 2011. World Development Indicator. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators(2012.4.23).