한국안광학회지 (Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society)

한국안광학회 (The Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society)
권호 표지

대학생의 동적시력에 관한 연구

The Study of Kinetic Visual Acuity in College Students

  • 심문식 (광주보건대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 김상현 (광주보건대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 강혜숙 (광주보건대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 심현석 (광주보건대학교 안경광학과)
  • 투고 : 2012.10.30
  • 심사 : 2012.12.15
  • 발행 : 2012.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 대학생의 동적시력, 시력, 굴절이상, 동공크기, 손의 반응력 등을 비교 분석하여 동적시력 연구에 기초 자료를 얻고자 하였다. 방법: 양안의 LogMAR 시력이 +0.1 이상인 안경광학과 학생 남녀 각각 39명을 대상으로 동적시력계(KOWA AS-4A), 손의 반응력 프로그램, 자동굴절검사기를 이용하여 측정하였고, 그 결과를 이용하여 동적시력의 남녀 차이와 검사 항목간의 상호 관계를 알아보았다. 결과: 남자의 경우는 동공크기 6.00 mm, 손의 반응력 0.23 msec, 등가구면굴절력 -Q1.66 D, 시력 -Q0.07, 동적시력 0.59로, 여자는 동공크기 5.86 mm, 손의 반응력 0.24 msec, 등가구면굴절력 -Q2.08 D, 시력 -Q0.02, 동적시력 0.46으로 각각 나타났다. 동적시력에서는 남녀 유의한 차이를 보였으나, 시력, 굴절이상, 손의 반응력, 동공크기 등은 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 또한 동적시력과 좌안의 시력이 r=-Q0.406으로 검사 항목 중 가장 높은 상관성을 보였고, 전체적으로는 시력의 증가와 굴절이상의 근시량 감소에 따라 동적시력이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 결론: 남자 대학생이 여자 대학생 보다 동적시력이 높은 것을 알 수 있었고, 원거리 시력이 동적시력과 관계가 있는 것을 알 수 있었다.

Purpose: We were to obtain the basic data for studying kinetic visual acuity through the comparative analysis in kinetic visual acuity, visual acuity, refractive error, pupil size, and hand reaction time for college students. Methods: We had tested the kinetic visual acuity, visual acuity, refractive error and hand reaction time using the kinetic visual acuity tester (KOWA AS-4A), the hand reaction time program and auto-refractometer for thirty-nine male and same female optometry students with more than +0.1 LogMAR visual acuity in both eyes. And the results were examined gender differences of kinetic visual acuity and the factors correlation. Results: In the measured values of male, pupil size were 6.00 mm, hand reaction time 0.23 msec, refractive error -1.66 D, visual acuity -0.07, kinetic visual acuity 0.59 and pupil size 5.86 mm, hand reaction time 0.24 msec, refractive error -2.08 D, visual acuity -0.02, kinetic visual acuity 0.46 in female. It was significant difference for kinetic visual acuity values but other factors were not. The kinetic visual acuity and left visual acuity had the highest correlation, r=-0.406. The kinetic visual acuity indicated more excellent values in the case of increasing visual acuity and decreasing myopia amount. Conclusions: It was able to see that male college students were better than female for kinetic visual acuity and the visual acuity were related to kinetic visual acuity.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Yoshimitsu K, Hiroshi Y. Training effects of visual function on college baseball players. Human performance measurement. 2004;1(1):15-23.
  2. Won CH, Mah KC. Sports vision training, 1st Ed. Seoul: Daehakselim, 1993;23-24.
  3. Junko U, Shingo N, Midori S, Yoshiki Y. Visual function of the junior soccer athletes. Human performance measurement. 2007;4(1):17-24.
  4. Yoshimitsu K, Hiroshi Y, Keishoku S, Kazuhiro A, Ryoko T. Development and gender differences in dynamic and kinetic visual acuities in children from 8 to 17 years of age. International J Sport and Health Sci. 2008;6(1):128- 134.
  5. Ishigaki H, Miyao M. Differences in dynamic visual acuity between athletes and nonathletes. Perceptual and Motor skills. 1993;77(3pt1):835-839. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1993.77.3.835
  6. Rouse MW, DeLand P, Christian R, Hawley J. A comparison study of dynamic visual acuity between athletes and nonathletes. J Am Optom Assoc. 1988;59(12):946-950.
  7. Hiromi M, Kenji Y, Takeshi Y, Tokio T. The characteristics of kinetic vision in women' table tennis players. Doshisha J Health and Sports Sci. 2010;2(1):26-37.
  8. Furuta H, Kajiyama T, Kurokawa T. Relationship between visual ability and serve-receiving performance in volleyball. Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education. Hiroshima University. Part. 2, Arts and science education. 2007;55(2):319-324.
  9. Nagahama T. An experimental study on the kinetic visual acuity of aged drivers. Fukui Institute of Technology. 1998;28(1):169-175.
  10. Mitsuru N, Minoru T, Daisuke K. Effects of aging and regular exercise on the visual function. Juntendo Medical Journal. 2005;51(2):153-159.
  11. Lee MA, Oh JM, Jung JH. Dynamic visual acuity and dynamic stereoacuity of athletes and nonathletes. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2009;14(3):43-49.
  12. Lee MA, Kim YG, Jung JH. Differences of dynamic visual acuity according to optical lens color. J Korean Oph Opt Soc. 2011;16(1):7-11.
  13. Yi MH, Sin JH. A study on the measurement of dynamic visual acuity for visual acuity chart size. Korean J Vis Sci. 2005;7(1):129-133.
  14. Yi MH, Mah KC, Won CH. A study on the measurement of dynamic visual acuity for athletes and nonathletes. Korean J Vis Sci. 2000;2(1):1-6.
  15. Ahn BC. Dynamic and kinetic visual acuity of athletes and nonathletes. J Korean Sports Med. 1998;16(2):238- 244.
  16. Inamizu T, Yasuda N, Ochi J, Morikawa A, Kinetic visual acuity in university students. J Japanese Physical Fitness and Sports Med. 1998;47(6):796.
  17. Yoshimitsu K, Hiroshi Y, Keishoku S, Kazuhiro H, Kazuhiro A, Kinetic visual acuity and reaction time in male college students. Human performance measurement. 2007; 4(1):25-30.
  18. Mochizuki S, Edagawa H, Hasuike M, A study of kinetic visual acuity and refraction in athletes. J Japanese Orthopt. 1998;26(1):137-143.
  19. Long GM, Penn DL. Dynamic visual acuity: normative functions and practical implications. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Soc Inc. 1987;25(4):253-256.
  20. Kakiyama T, Kushima A, Hirota A. Effects of the correction of visual acuity on kinetic visual acuity (KVA) in high school rugby players. Japanese J Physical Fitness and Sports Med. 2004;53(2):255-262.