Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development (농촌지도와개발)

Korean Society of Agricultural Extension (한국농촌지도학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Determinants of Strong Small Farm: Focusing on Apples

강소농의 공간적 분포특성과 결정요인 분석 -사과를 중심으로-

  • Kim, Hyun Joong (Institute of Regional Planning and Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Seong Woo (Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Seoul National University)
  • 김현중 (서울대학교 농업생명과학연구원) ;
  • 이성우 (서울대학교 농경제사회학부)
  • Received : 2012.10.20
  • Accepted : 2012.12.10
  • Published : 2012.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The present study is to investigate the characteristics and determinants of spatial distribution of strong small farm by defining the term, strong small farm (SSF) extracting the SSF households data dealing with apples, from 2010 Census of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Korea. Spatial distribution and concentration of SSF are analyzed based on spatial clustering techniques. We construct discrete dependent variables on strong and non-strong small farms and then analyze the determinants of the SSFs using probit model, with independent variables including population and economic characteristics and management characteristics. As of 2010, the apple SSFs, 1,529 households in total, are geographically concentrated in Gyeonsangbuk-do according to the analysis results. The determinants of SSF are similar to those of farms' earnings. When located in the apple producing area, and participating in producers organization while selling products directly, the farm is highly likely an SSF. The findings and results of the present study are expected to provide fundamental information helpful for preparing and implementing policies for SSFs in that the present study investigates the characteristics of SSF, which is a prerequisite step for SSF-related policies.

본 연구는 강소농의 개념 정립을 통해 사과를 대상으로 강소농의 공간적 분포특성과 결정요인을 분석하였으며, 2010년 농림어업총조사 자료를 활용하였다. 공간적 분포특성은 공간 클러스터링 기법을 이용하여 과수 강소농 가구가 어느 지역에 집중적으로 분포하는지를 분석하였다. 강소농과 비강소농의 이산적인 형태의 종속변인을 구성한 후, 프로빗 모형을 활용, 인구 경제적, 경영 특성 등의 독립변인을 통제한 상태에서 사과 강소농의 결정요인을 분석하였다. 분석결과, 2010년 현재 사과 강소농은 모두 1,529가구로 분석되었으며, 이들 가구들은 경상북도에 밀집하여 분포하는 것으로 드러났다. 강소농의 결정요인은 농가의 소득 결정요인과 유사한 결과를 보였다. 사과 주산지에 입지하고 있고, 정보화가 높은 농가일수록, 그리고 생산자 조직에 참여하고 있으며, 직접 판매를 하는 농가일수록 강소농일 확률이 높게 나타났다. 본 연구의 분석결과는 강소농 정책을 육성하는데 있어 반드시 요구되는 강소농의 특성을 파악하였다는 측면에서 향후 강소농 육성 정책에 다양한 기초자료를 제공할 수 있으리라 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김병택. (2002) 한국의 농업정책. 서울: 한울아카데미.
  2. 김현중, & 이성우. (2012). 강소농의 공간적 분포특성과 결정요인 분석 : 과수를 중심으로. 2012 전기사회학대회 발표논문, 3-5.
  3. 농촌진흥청. (2011). 강소농 육성을 위한 시범 드림컨설팅 추진단 운영 결과, 강소농 추진 중간보고회 자료.
  4. 미농림부. (1998). ERS의 농가유형 구분체계(http://search.nal.usda.gov/afsicsearch/result-list/fullRecord:ers/)
  5. 이상일, 조대헌, 손학기, & 채미옥. (2010). 공간 클러스터의 범역 설정을 위한 GIS-기반 방법론 연구. 대한지리학회지, 45(4), 502-520.
  6. 이성우, 민성희, 박지영, & 윤성도 (2005). 로짓.프라빗모형 응용, 서울: 박영사.
  7. 이성우, 권오상, & 이호철. (2003). 경기기역 농산물의 지역별 특화산업 연구. 농촌경제, 26(2), 23-47.
  8. 이희연, & 심재헌. (2011). GIS지리정보학, 경기도: 법문사.
  9. 임정빈. (2004). 한국농업을 둘러싼 대내외 여건변화 동향과 대응과제. 농업생명과학연구, 38(1), 47-55.
  10. 최인식. (2006) 경제성숙단계에서의 소농의 재인식. 경제발전연구, 12(1), 147-171.
  11. 통계청. (2010). 농림어업총조사.
  12. Akram-Lodhi, A. (2007). Review Essay: Land Reform, Rural Social Relations and the peasantry. Jounal of Agrarian Change, 7(4), 556-562.
  13. Anselin, L. (1995). Local Indicators of Spatial Association LISA, Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 286-306.
  14. Assuncao, J., & Ghatak, M. (2003). Can Unobserved Heterogeneity in Farmer Ability Explain the Inverse Relationship between Farm Size and Productivity. Economics Letters, 80(2), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00091-0
  15. Binswanger, H., & Rosenzweig, M. (1986) Contractual Arrangements, Employment, and wages in rural labor market: a critical review. Agricultural Development Council, 61-69.
  16. Cornial, G. (1985). Farm Size, Land Yields and the Agricultural Production Function: An analysis for fifteen developing countries. World development, 13(4), 513-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(85)90054-3
  17. Deininger, K., & Feder, G. (2001). Land Institutions andand Institutions and Land Markets. Handbook of Agricultural Economics, 1, 287-331.
  18. Dixon, J., Taniguchi, K. & Wattenbach. (2003). Approaches to assessing the impact of globalisation on African smallholders: household and village economy Small holder Study, a FAO and World Bank working sessionm Rome; FAO
  19. Eastwood, R., M. Lipton, & Newell, A. (2004). Farm size. Paper prepared for Volume III of the Handbook of Agricultural Economics.
  20. Ellis, F. (1990). Peasant Economics: Farm households and agrarian development. Cambridge.: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Eswaran, M. & Kotwal, A. (1986). Access to capital and agrarian production organization, Economic Journal, 96, 482-498. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233128
  22. Heltberg, R. (1998). Rural Market Imperfections and the Farm Size-Productivity Relationship: Evidence from Pakistan. World Development, 26(10), 1807-1816. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00084-9
  23. Hung, P., MacAulay, T., & Marsh, S. (2007). The economics of land fragmentation in the north of Vietnam. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 51(2), 195-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2007.00378.x
  24. Irz, X., Lin, L., Thirtle, C., & Wiggins, S. (2001). Agricultural growth and poverty alleviation. Development Policy Review, 19(4), 449-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00144
  25. Lerman, Z., & Cimpoies, D. (2006). Land consolidation as a factor for rural development in Moldova. Europe-Asia Studies, 58(3), 439-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130600601933
  26. Lipton, M. (2005). The family farm in a globalizing world: The role of crop science in alleviating poverty. 2020 Vision for Food, Agriculture, and the Enviroment Initiative Discussion Paper No. 40. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.
  27. Narayanan, S., & Gulati, A. (2002). Globalization and the smallholders: A review of issues, approaches, and inplications. Markets and Structural Studies Division Discussion Paper NO. 50. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.
  28. OECD. (2006). Promoting pro-poor growth. Agriculture, DAC guidelines and reference series, A DAC reference document. Paris: OECD.
  29. Sen, A. (1962). An Aspect of Indian Agriculture, The Economic Weekly, 14, 243-246.
  30. Taylor, J., & Adelman, I. (2003). Agricultural Household Models: Genesis, Evolution, and Extensions. Review of Economics of the Household, 1(1), 33-59. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021847430758
  31. Wiggins, S., Kirsten, J., & Llambi, L. (2010). The Future of Small Farms. World Development, 38(10), 1341-1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.013
  32. World Bank., 2003, Reaching the rural poor: A renewed strategy for rural development. Washington, D.C : World Bank.
  33. Wu, Z., Liu, M., & Davis, J. (2005). Land consolidation and productivity in Chinese household crop production. China Economic Review, 16(1), 28-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2004.06.010

Cited by

  1. Informationization of small-scale agribusinesses in rural areas of Korea vol.32, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915593620
  2. The Effects of Strong Small Farm Policy for Participation Farms vol.20, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2014.20.3.089
  3. 강소농사업 참여농가의 역량강화에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석 vol.22, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12653/jecd.2015.22.3.0261
  4. 우리나라 사과 클러스터의 ‘코러플’ 브랜드 수출전략-안동, 충주, 거창 그리고 예산지역을 중심으로- vol.17, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.18852/bdak.2019.17.3.41