References
- Baguette, M., G. Mennechez, S. Petit and N. Schtickzelle. 2003. Effect of habitat fragmentation on dispersal in the butterfly Proclossoana eunomia. Comptes Rendus Bilogies 326: 200-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1631-0691(03)00058-1
- Bauerfeind, S.S., A. Theisen and K. Fischer. 2008. Patch occupancy in the endangered butterfly Lycaena helle in a fragmented landscape: effects of habitat quality, patch size and isolation. J. Insect Conserv. 13:271-277.
- Binzenhofer, B., R. Biedermann, J. Settele and B. Schroder. 2007. Connectivity compensates for low habitat quality and small 8 patch size in the butterfly Cupido minimus. Ecol. Res. 23: 259-269.
- Box, J. 1996. Setting objectives and defining out puts for ecological restoration and habitat creation. Restoration Ecol. 4: 427-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.1996.tb00196.x
- Bruckmann, S.V., J. Krauss and I. Steffan-Dewenter. 2010. Butterfly and plant specialists suffer from reduced connectivity in fragmented landscapes. J. Appl. Ecol. 47: 799-809. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01828.x
- Debinski, D.M. and R.D. Holt. 2000. A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv. Biol.14: 342-355. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98081.x
- Fischer, K., B. Beinlich and H. Plachter. 1999. Population structure, mobility and habitat preferences of the violet copper Lycaena helle (Lepidoptera: Lycaeindae) in Western Germany: implication for conservation. J. Insect Conserv. 3: 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009630506216
- Goffart, P., N. Schtickzelle and C. Turlure. 2010. Conservation and Management of the Habitats of Two Relict Butterflies in the Belgian Ardenne: Proclossiana eunomia and Lycaena helle. pp. 357-370. In Relict Species, eds. by J.C. Habel and T. Assmann. Springer-Verlang, Berlin Heidelberg.
- Haddad N.M. and K.A. Baum. 1999. An experimental test of corridor effects on butterfly densities. Ecol. Appl. 9: 623-633. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0623:AETOCE]2.0.CO;2
- Hanski, I. and M.E. Gilpin. 1997. Case studies. pp. 353-357. In Metapopulation biology: ecology, Genetics, and evolution, eds. by I. Hanski and M.E. Gilpin. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
- Hanski, I., J. Alho and A. Moilanen, 2000. Estimating the parameters of survival and migration of individuals in metapopulations. Ecology 81: 239-251. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0239:ETPOSA]2.0.CO;2
- Jolly, G.M. 1965. Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model. Biometrika 52: 225-247. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.1-2.225
- Kim, D.S., Y.B. Cho and J.K. Koh. 1999. The factors of local disappearance and a plan of restoration for Parnassius bremeri form Okchon-gun, Korea. Korean J. Environ. 17: 469-479. (in Korean with English abstract)
- Kim, D.S. and Y.J. Kwon. 2010. Metapopulation dynamics of the oriental Long-tailed Swallow Sericinus montela (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in Korea. Kor. J. Appl. Entomol. 49: 289-297. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2010.49.4.289
- Kim, D.S., D.S. Park, Y.J. Kwon, S.J. Suh, C.H. Kim, S.J. Park, D.H. Kim, J.S. Kim, H.M. Yu and J.S. Hwang. 2011. Metapopulation structure and movement of a threatened butterfly Parnassius bremeri (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in Korea. Kor. J. Appl. Entomol. 50: 97-105. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2011.03.0.12
- Kindlmann, P., S. Aviron and F. Burel. 2005. When is landscape matrix important for determining animal fluxes between resource patches? Ecological Complexity 2: 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2004.11.007
- Ko, M.S., J.S. Lee, C.H. Kim, S.S. Kim and K.T. Park. 2004. Distributional data and ecological characteristics of Parnassius bremeri Bremer in Korea. Kor. J. Appl. Entomol. 43: 7-14. (in Korean with English abstract)
- Komonen A., T. Tikkamaki, N. Mattila and J.S. Kotiaho. 2008. Patch size and connectivity influence the population turnover of the threatened chequered blue butterfly, Scolitantides orion (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Eur. J. Entomol. 105: 131-136. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2008.018
- Park K.T. and S.S. Kim. 1997. Atlas of butterflies. Korea Research institute of bioscience and biotechnology and center for insect systematic, Korea.
- Roland, J., N. Keyghobadi and S. Fownes. 2000. Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: Effects of landscape and population size. Ecology 81: 1642-1653. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1642:APBDEO]2.0.CO;2
- Prugh, L. R. 2009. An evaluation of patch connectivity measures. Ecol. Appl. 19: 1300-1310. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1524.1
- SAS-StatView 5.0.1. 1998. SAS institute Inc. second edition.
- Schtickzelle, N. and M. Baguette. 2003. Behavioural responses to habitat patch boundaries restrict dispersal and generate migration-patch area relationships in fragmented landscapes. J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 533-545. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00723.x
- Schultz, C.B. and E.E. Crone. 2005. Patch size and connectivity thresholds for butterfly habitat restoration. Conserv. Biol. 9: 887-896.
- Sousa, W. P. 1985. Disturbance and patch dynamics on Rocky intertidal shores. pp. 101-124. In The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics, eds. by Pickett, S.T.A. and P.S. White. Academic press, San Diego, California, USA.
- Tscharntke, T., I. Steffan-Dewenter, A. Kruess and C. Thies. 2002. Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: A mini review. Ecol. Res. 17: 229-239. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00482.x
- Thomas, C. D and I. Hanski. 2004. Metapopulation dynamics in changing environments: Butterfly responses to habitat and climate change. pp. 489-514. In Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations, eds. by Hanski, I. and O.E. Gaggiotti. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
- Thomas, C.D., J.A. Thomas and M.S. Warren. 1992. Distributions of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes. Oecologia 92: 563-567. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317850
- Van Swaay, C.A.M. and M.S. Warren. 1999. Rad data book of European butterflies. Council of Europe publishing. Nature and Environment. No. 99. Strasbourg.
- Van Swaay, C.A.M and M.S. Warren. 2006. Prime butterfly areas of Europe: an initial selection of priority sites for conservation. J. Insect Conserv. 10: 5-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-005-7548-1