Comparison of Effectiveness of Breathing Intervention Program for Improvement of Pulmonary Functions according to Prevalence Period in Patients with COPD

만성폐쇄성폐질환 환자의 폐기능 향상을 위한 호흡중재기법의 유병기간별 비교

  • Received : 2012.09.13
  • Accepted : 2012.10.15
  • Published : 2012.10.25

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation on lung function and fatigue in persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: Thirty one persons with COPD participated in this study. Four groups were allocated as follows: experimental group 1 (under 10 years of the post-disease period), control group 1 (under 10 years of the post-disease period), experimental group 2 (over 10 years of the post-disease period), and control group 2 (over 10 years of the post-disease period). Results: Forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) % pred and lactic acid showed improvement in experimental group 1 and experimental group 2 after training. Control group 1 and control group 2 did not show improvement of FEV1% pred and lactic acid after training. However, FEV1% pred and lactic acid in experimental group 1 were not significantly different, compared with the experimental group. Conclusion: Results of our study suggest that implementation of a pulmonary rehabilitation program resulted in improvement of lung function and fatigue in persons with COPD not related to the post-disease period.

Keywords

References

  1. Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease. Global stragegy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Update. 2009.
  2. Annual Report on the Cause of Death Statistics. Statistics Korea. 11-1240000-000028-10. 2010.
  3. Dahlen I, Janson C. Anxiety and depression are related to the outcome of emergency treatment in patients with obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest. 2002;122(5):1633-7. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.122.5.1633
  4. Oh HS. Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation program on exercise capacity/tolerance and general health status. Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 2003;33(6):743-52.
  5. Haggerty MC, Stockdale-Woolley R, ZuWallack R. Functional status in pulmonary rehabilitation participants. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1999;19(1):35-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008483-199901000-00005
  6. Kang JI, Jeong DK, Park SK, Lee JH. Effects of chest resistance exercise on forced expiratory volume in one second and fatigue in patients with COPD. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2011;23(2):37-43.
  7. Kim HS. The effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on reli of respiratory symptoms in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chonbuk National University. Dissertation of Master's Degree. 2002.
  8. Ignatavicius DD, Workman ML, Misher MA. Medical-surgical nursing proce approach. 3rd. Philadelphia, W.B Saunders Co., 1999.
  9. Gosselink R, Troosters T, Decramer M. Peripheral muscle weakness contributes to exercise limitation in COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;153(3):976-80. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.153.3.8630582
  10. Breukink SO, Strijbos JH, Koorn M et al. Relationship between subjective fatigue and physiological variables in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 1998;92(4):676-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-6111(98)90517-0
  11. Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Pusan National University. Seoul, KoonJa, 2003.
  12. Scherer YK, Schmieder LE, Shimmel S. The effects of education alone and in combination with pulmonary rehabilitation on selfefficacy in patients with COPD. Rehabil Nurs. 1998;23(2):71-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2048-7940.1998.tb02133.x
  13. Rabe KF, Hurd S, Anzueto A et al; Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176(6):532-55. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200703-456SO
  14. Jung JH, Kim JY. The effects of self-efficacy promoting pulmonary rehabilitation program in out-patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Tuberc Respir Dis. 2006;61(6):533-46. https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2006.61.6.533
  15. Covey MK, Larson JL, Wirtz SE et al. High-intensity inspiratory muscle training in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and severely reduced function. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2001;21(4):231-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008483-200107000-00008
  16. Hui KP, Hewitt AB. A simple pulmonary rehabilitation program improves health outcomes and reduces hospital utilization in patients with COPD. Chest. 2003;124(1):94-7. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.124.1.94
  17. Behnke M, Taube C, Kirsten D et al. Home-based exercise is capable of preserving hospital-based improvements in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2000;94(12):1184-91. https://doi.org/10.1053/rmed.2000.0949
  18. Kim SH. The effect of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program in COPD patients. Yonsei University. Dissertation of Master's Degree. 2002.
  19. Guell R, Casan P, Belda J et al. Long-term effects of outpatient rehabilitation of COPD: a randomized trial. Chest. 2000;117(4):976-83. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.117.4.976
  20. Reid WD, Samrai B. Respiratory muscle training for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Phys Ther. 1995;75(11):996-1005.
  21. Casaburi R, Wasserman K, Patessio A et al. A new perspective in pulmonary rehabilitation: anaerobic threshold as a discriminant in training. Eur Respir J Suppl. 1989;7:618s-23s.
  22. Han SJ. The effects of pulmonary rehabilitation program for chronicobstructive pulmonary disease patients. Catholic University of Korea. Dissertation of Doctorate Degree. 2003.
  23. Na HR. Explorative study on fatigue in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Kyung Hee University. Dissertation of Master's Degree. 2000.
  24. Ries AL, Kaplan RM, Limberg TM et al. Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on physiologic and psychosocial outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122(11):823-32. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-122-11-199506010-00003