Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Management and Improvement of Distressed Urban Areas through the Partnership among Stakeholders - A Case Study of Quartiersmanagement Program in Berlin, Germany -

스테이크홀더 협력관계 구성을 통한 도시빈곤지역의 관리와 개선 - 독일 베를린 Quartiersmanagement 사례분석 -

  • 윤훤 ((주)건축사사무소 지오디자인 R&D Design Center)
  • Received : 2012.05.20
  • Published : 2012.09.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the process of managing and improving Distressed Urban Area (DUA), which is one of the emerging issues in European countries, through stakeholder partnership among them. Based on the literature review and a case study of Quartiersmanagement Program in Berlin, Germany, the results are: 1) There are various social, cultural problems depending on each area's own social and physical characters. Furthermore, there is a large number of relevant stakeholders in DUAs. In this regard, DUAs could not be dealt with traditional comprehensive policies or plans, which were mostly implemented in a top-down manner. Thus, area-focused policies or plans would be a basis for solving these problems in DUAs; 2) Relevant stakeholders such as civil society, government side actors, residence and private business companies could provide valuable information for establishing policies or plans, strengthen the implementation process and prevent the negative effects such as the gentrification; 3) In this regard, the partnership among the stakeholders should be recognized as the most important factor for successful policies implementation. Finally, the stakeholder partnership could be a basis for solving the social and spatial problems occurring in DUAs.

Keywords

References

  1. 김희철, 안건혁, 이주회로별 수도권 외국인 거주지역 공간분포와 영향요인. 국토계획, 46(5), 2011.
  2. 전원식, 김남두, 황희연, 주민참여 마을만들기 사업주체 및 추진주체 분석, 한국도시설계학회지, 9(4), 2008.
  3. Amt fur Statistik Berlin-Brandenburg, 14 Prozent der Berlinerinnen und Berliner haben einen auslandischen Pass, 2012
  4. Andersson, R. & Brama, A., Selective migration in Swedish distressed neighbourhoods: can area‐based urban policies counteract segregation processes? Housing Studies, 19(4), 2004.
  5. Arnstein S. R, A ladder of citizen participation. JAIP, 35(4), 1969.
  6. Bundesministerium fur Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung, Status Report: The Programme "Social City" (Soziale Stadt), 2008.
  7. Blasius, J. & Friedrichs, J., Internal Heterogeneity of a Deprived Urban Area and its Impact on Residents' Perception of Deviance. Housing Studies, 22(5), 2007.
  8. Conway, M. & Konvitz, J., Meeting the Challenge of Distressed Urban Areas. Urban Studies, 37(4), 2000.
  9. Cullen, P., The Way Forward. OECD and EFILWC Conference on Partnerships, Participation, Investment and Innovation: Meeting the Challenge of Distressed Urban Areas, Dublin, Ireland, 1998.
  10. Department Socially Integrative City, The Neighborhood Councils within the Neighborhood Management Process, Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt: Berlin, 2010.
  11. Franke, T., & Lohr, R.-P.. Neighbourhood Management ‐ A Key Instrument in Integrative Urban District Development. EURA‐Conference "Area‐based initiatives in contemporary urban policy ‐ innovations in city governance". 2001.
  12. Glass, J. J., Citizen Participation in Planning : The Relationship Between Objectives and Techniques. Journal of American Planning Association, 45(2), 1979.
  13. Innes, J.E. & Booher, D.E., Public Participation in Planning: New Strategies for the 21st Century.', 2000.
  14. Kooiman, J., Societal Governance: Levels, Models, and Orders of Social -- Political Interaction, in J. Pierre (Ed.): Debating governance, pp.138-166, 2000.
  15. Korsu, E. & Wenglenski, S., Job Accessibility, Residential Segregation and Risk of Long-term Unemployment in the Paris Region, 2010.
  16. Moatasim, F., Practice of Community Architecture: A Case Study of Zone of Opportunity Housing Cooperative, Montreal, Published Thesis (M.A), McGill University. 1995.
  17. OECD, Integrating Distressed Urban Areas, OECD Publishing. 1998.
  18. Pares, M., Bonet-Marti, J. &Marti-Costa, M., Does Participation Really Matter in Urban Regeneration Policies? Exploring Governance Networks in Catalonia (Spain). Urban Affairs Review, 48(2), pp.238-271. 2011.
  19. Parkinson, M., The Social and Economic Signi cance of Improving Distressed Urban Areas, OECD and EFILWC Conference on Partnerships, Participation, Investment and Innovation: Meeting the Challenge of Distressed Urban Areas, Dublin, Ireland, 1998.
  20. Quartiersmanagement Berlin, 'Chronologie', 2012.
  21. Sanoff, H., Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2000.
  22. Senatsverwaltung fur Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt, 'Quartiersmanagement Berlin', 2012a.
  23. Senatsverwaltung fur Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt, 'Quartiersmanagement', 2012b
  24. Toker, Z., Recent trends in community design: the eminence of participation. Design Studies, 28(3), 2007.