DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on quality assessment of dental office websites

치과 웹사이트의 질 평가에 관한 연구

  • 김선영 (광주여자대학교 치위생학과) ;
  • 김남송 (원광대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Received : 2012.07.25
  • Accepted : 2012.10.20
  • Published : 2012.10.30

Abstract

Objectives : The purpose of this study was to make a comparative analysis of the websites of dental office from different countries to provide some information for the quality evaluation of the websites of dental office. Methods : Two hundred twenty-four dental websites were selected by using Yahoo, one of the international portal sites, which included 59 from the United States, 50 from the United Kingdom, 54 from Canada, and 61 from Korea. Results : 1. As results of the credibility of the websites, the Canadian websites were most reliable, followed by the American websites, the English websites and the Korean ones(p<0.005). 2. As results of the complementarity of the websites, the Korean websites were most interactive, followed by the American websites, the English websites, and the Canadian ones(p<0.001). 3. As results of the accessibility of use of the websites, the Korean websites were easiest to use, followed by the American websites, the Canadian websites, and the English ones(p<0.001). 4. As results of the update of the websites from the nations, the Korean websites were most sustainable, followed by the English websites, the Canadian websites and the American ones(p<0.05). 5. When the overall quality of the dental office websites was assessed, the Korean websites were the best, followed by the Canadian websites, the American websites and the English ones(p<0.001). Conclusions : In order to make accurate oral health information more accessible to people in general, prolonged research efforts should be continued for the evaluation of the quality of dental office websites, and the development of standard international evaluation criteria is required as well.

Keywords

References

  1. Eysenbach G. Consumer health informatics. BMJ 2000;320(7251):1713-1716. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1713
  2. Kassirer JP. Patients, physicians, and the internet. Health Aff(milwood) 2000;19(6):115-123.
  3. Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, et al. The impact of health information on the internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1,050 U.S physicians. J Med Internet Res 2003;5(3):e17. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5.3.e17
  4. Jadad AR, Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the internet: Navigating to knowledge or to babel?. JAMA 1998:279(8):611-614. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.8.611
  5. Eight in ten internet users have looked for health information online, with increased interest in diet, fitness, drugs, health insurance, experimental treatment, and particular doctor and hospitals. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Healthtopics_May05.pdfs. 2010.
  6. Song TM, Park EJ, Lim EJ. The survey of the demand for health information on the internet. Healthcare Informatics Research 2002;8(2):17-24.
  7. Sohn AR. Criteria for evaluating health information sites on the internet. J Korean Soc Health Statistics 2000;2(1):73-79.
  8. Samantha LM. Environmental health information of the internet: Development of an appropriate [Master's thesis]. Pittsburgh:The graduated school of Pittsburgh university;2009.
  9. Kim SY, Oh JS, Moon SE. A survey on the understanding of dental homepages by student of dental hygiene departments and dental hygienist in some regions. J Korean Acad Dent Hyg Educ 2011;11(4):453-464.
  10. Kim SY, Jang SH, Moon SE. An Investigation on the Recognition Degrees of the Dental Clinics' Homepages by Students of Dental Hygienic Departments in Some Areas. J Korean Acad Dent Hyg Educ 2009;9(4):1-15.
  11. Jeong EH. A study on evaluation of oral health-related internet sites in korea[Master's thesis]. Seoul:The graduated school of Seoul national university;2005.
  12. Cheong KE. A study on the quality assessment of the web site of dental hospital / clinic in korea[Master's thesis]. Cheonan:The graudate school of Dankook university;2009.
  13. Kang NM, Kim J, T GR, Hyun TS. Criteria for the websites in Korean with health information on the Internet. Healthcare Informatics research 1999;5(1):119-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/146045829900500302
  14. Chung YC, Park HA. Development of a health information evaluation system on the internet. Healthcare Informatics research 2000;6(1):53-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/146045820000600110
  15. HON. HON code of conduct for medical and health web sites, Available at: http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html, 2011.
  16. Roberts L. Health information and the Internet: The 5 Cs website evaluation tool. Br J Nurs 2010;19(5):322-325. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2010.19.5.47075
  17. RSPH. Websites evaluation tool, Available at: http://www.spat.pitt.edu/research.php. 2011.
  18. DiMaggio P, Hargittai E, Newman WR, Robinson JP. Social implication of the internet. Annu Rev Sociol 2001;27:307-336. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.307
  19. Haughton LT, Kreuter M, Hall J, Holt CL, Wheetley E. Digital divide and stability of access in african american women visiting urban public health centers. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2005;16(2):362-374. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2005.0034
  20. Kiel JM. The digital divide. Internet and e-mail use by the elderly. Med Inform Internet Med 2005;30(1):19-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639230500066900
  21. Houston TK, Allison JJ. Users of internet health information: differences by health status. J Med Internet Res 2002:4(2):e7. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4.2.e7
  22. Chae YM, Lee SH, Cho WH. Information searching behavior of health care consumers by sociodemographic characteristics. Korean J Prev Med 2001;34(4):389-398.
  23. Smith-barbaro PA, Licciardone JC, Clarke HF, Coleridge ST. Factors associated with intended use of a web site among family practice patients. J Med Internet Res 2001;3(2):e17. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3.2.e17
  24. Licciardone JC, Smith-barbaro PA, Coleridge ST. Use of the internet as a resource for consumer health information: results of the second osteopathic survey of health care in america (OSTEOSURV-II). J Med Internet Res 2001;34(4):e31.
  25. Pingree S, Hawkins RP, Costafson DH. Will the disadvantaged ride the information superhighway? Hopeful answer from a computer-based health crisis system. J Broadcast Electron Media 1996;40(3):331-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159609364357
  26. Sohn AR, Suth MK. Evaluating health information sites on the internet in korea: a cross-sectional survey. Asia Pac J Public Health 2001;13Suppl:S19-22.
  27. Park JH, Lee JS, Jang HJ, Kim Y. Factors affecting comsumer's usage of health information on the internet. Korean J Prev Med 2008;14(4):241-248.
  28. Dickerson S, Reinhart AM, Feeley TH, et al. Patient internet use for health information at three urban primary care clinics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004 Nov-Dec;11(6):499-504. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1460
  29. Online Health Search, [Pew Internet & American Life Project] Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/pip_he. 2006.
  30. Jung MS. An analysis of web sites on the nursing departments for hospital internet marketing. J Korean Acad Nurs Administration 2001;7(3):531-543.
  31. Medical korea, [Foreigners attract performance report] Available at: http://www.medicalkorea.or.kr/webzine/html/04.stats/01.html
  32. 의료관광유치'적극적', 2011/01/22, Available at: http://www.mdtoday.co.kr/mdtoday/index.html?no=148758&cate=2&sub=&key=&word=&page=
  33. Kang DS. Comparative cultural study on national tourism websites(Based on Hofstede's 5 cultural dimensions)[Master's thesis]. Seoul:The graduat school of Yonsei university;2005.
  34. Kim TS, Lee HJ. Contents and operational situation of internet homepage in general hospital. Korean J Hospi Management 1999;4(2):192-218.

Cited by

  1. Comparison of dental information websites in some nations vol.14, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2014.14.02.261
  2. 인터넷 구강건강정보 이용에 대한 환자와 치과위생사의 인식비교 vol.19, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.20190070