한국축산시설환경학회지 (Journal of Animal Environmental Science)

한국축산환경학회 (The Korean Society of Animal Environmental Science & Technology)
권호 표지

깔짚 두께가 한우사 바닥환경과 생산성에 미치는 영향

Effects of Bedding Thickness of Sawdust on Environment of Cowshed Floor and Productivity of Hanwoo

  • 투고 : 2012.11.16
  • 심사 : 2012.12.03
  • 발행 : 2012.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 깔짚 두께가 한우의 사료섭취량, 혈액성상 및 바닥 환경에 미치는 영향을 검토하기 위해 수행되었다. 사료 섭취량은 깔짚의 두께가 얇은 것보다 두꺼울 때 증가되는 경향을 보였다. 깔짚 두께의 증가는 혈중 total protein, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol 및 GGT 농도에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤다. 깔짚의 수분 함량 및 대장균수는 깔짚의 두께 10 cm 보다 15 및 20 cm에서 뚜렷하게 낮은 결과를 보였다. 따라서 한우의 건강과 생산성 향상을 위해서는 깔짚의 두께는 20 cm 정도가 이상적이며, 최소한 깔짚의 두께는 15 cm 이상을 유지하는 것이 바람직한 것으로 판단된다.

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of bedding thickness of sawdust on feed intake, blood metabolites concentration and environmental condition of cowshed floor for Hanwoo. Feed intake was increased at thicker bedding groups (15 or 20cm), compared with thinner bedding group (10cm). The thicker bedding had a positive effect on concentration of serum total protein, high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and ${\gamma}$-glutamyltransferase (GGT). Moisture content and the number of E. Coli in the bedding material were remarkably lower in 15 and 20 cm groups, compared with 10 cm group. Based on the data obtained in this study, approximately 20 cm bedding thickness or at least over 15 cm would be maintained to improve the health condition of Hanwoo and hence to enhance the productivity.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Andersen, H. R., Krohn, C. C., Foldager, J., Munksgaard, L. and Klastrup, S. 1991 : Influence of housing and feeding on behaviour, feed intake, growth and carcass and meat quality. Research report, The National Institute of Animal Science, Foulum, Denmark.
  2. A.O.A.C. 1990 : Official Methods of Analysis (15th Ed). Association of Official Analytical Chemist. Washington. D. C.
  3. Broom, D. M. and A. F. Fraser. 2007 : domestic animal behavior and welfare 4th edition. CAB International.
  4. Burgess, D. and Hutchinson, W. G. 2005. Do people value the welfare of farm animals. EuroChoices 3, 36-43.
  5. Chrpvos, G. P. 1992 : Regulation and dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. The corticotropin-releasing hormone perspective. Endocrinal. Metab. Clin. N. Am. 21, 833-858.
  6. Goering, H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. Forage fiber analysis. 1970 : Hatcy. Page 222 in nutrition and lactation in the daily cow. ed. Garnsworthy. P. C. printed by Anchor-Brandon Ltd. Tiptree, Essex. England.
  7. Gottardo, F., Ricci, R., Preciso, S., Ravarotto, L. and Cozzi, G. 2004 : Effect of the manager space on welfare and meat quality of beef cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 89, 277-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.01.002
  8. Levy, D., Holzer, Z. and Volcani, R. 1970 : Concrete slatted floors vs. bedding for fattening Israeli-Friesian bull calves. J. Anim. Sci. 31, 816-820. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1970.314816x
  9. Lowe, D. E., Steen, R. W. J., Beattie, V. E. and Moss, B. W. 2001 : The effects of floor type systems on the performance, cleanliness, carcass composition and meat quality of housed finishing beef cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 69, 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00246-3
  10. Lowe, D. E., Steen, R. W., Beattie, V. E., Moss, B. W. and Kirkland, R. M. 2003 : The effect of housing system on performance, behaviour and welfare of beef cattle. Farmer Funded Research: project B-02-97, The Agricultural Research and Development Council, Dungannon, The Northern Ireland.
  11. Mercier, Y., Gatellier, P. and Renerre, M. 2004 : Lipid and protein oxidation in vitro, and antioxidant potential in meat from Charolais cows finished on pasture or mixed diet. Meat Sci. 66, 467-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00135-9
  12. Realini, C. E., Duckett, S. K., Brito, G. W., Rizza, M. D. and De Mattos, D. 2004. Effect of pasture vs. concentrate feeding with or without antioxidants on carcass characteristics, fatty acid composition, and quality of Uruguayan beef. Meat Sci. 66, 567-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00160-8
  13. SAS. 1999. SAS/STAT Software for PC. Release 6.11, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, U.S.A.
  14. Wander, J. F. 1976 : Haltungs-und verfahrenstechnisch orientierte verhaltensforschung Zuechtungskunde, 447-459.
  15. 강희설, 홍성구, 조원모, 백봉현, 박치호, 이덕수. 1995 : 톱밥이용 한우 분뇨처리에 관한 연구. 축산시설환경. 1, 1-8.
  16. 김동균, 정다운. 2004 : 우사의 향방에 따른 사육장 바닥면의 조건이 비육말기 거세한우의 생산성에 미치는 영향. 축산시설환경. 10, 37-46.
  17. 서석봉. 2001 : 톱밥우사 이용한 한우분뇨 처리기술.
  18. 이강연. 2009 : 한우 사육용 깔짚으로서 톱밥과 코코피트의 특성 및 송풍과 우사 내 위치가 이용성에 미치는 영향. 건국대학교 석사학위 논문.
  19. 이성수, 박노형, 정재경, 원유석. 1997 : 이스트컬쳐 (Yeast culture) 급여가 한우의 성장과 도체형질에 미치는 영향. 한국동물자원과학회지. 39, 391-400.
  20. 축산기술연구소. 1998 : 축산시험 연구보고서. 517-522.