이기종 프록시 이동(모바일) IPv6 네트워크에서 QoS가 보장된 글로벌 로밍 핸:드오버 방식

QoS Guaranteed Handover Scheme for Global Roaming in Heterogeneous Proxy Mobile IPv6 Networks

  • 투고 : 2011.08.25
  • 심사 : 2012.01.18
  • 발행 : 2012.01.25

초록

무선 통신에서 이동성과 서비스 품질(QoS)에 대한 요구는 점점 더 중요한 문제로 부각되고 있다. 종래의 인터넷 서비스는 새로운 접속매체들과 어플리케이선으로 확대되고 있는 중이며, 무선 통신 서비스는 원격 지점에서의 번번한 핸드오버를 수반하기 때문에 유비쿼터스 통신에서는 확장가능하고 빠른 핸드오버가 필요조건이 되고 있다. 본 논문에서는 QoS가 보장된 서비스와 빠른 핸드오버 요건을 만족시키고자 이 기종 프록시 이동 IPv6(PMIPv6) 네트워크에 차별화 서비스(Diffserv) 모형을 배치하고, QoS가 보장된 글로벌 로밍 작동 절차 뿐 아니라, 이동 단말의 이동 범위를 기반으로 한 QoS 관리와 핸드오버 비용평가 방식을 제안하였다. 또한 핸드오버 지연 감소를 네트워크 기반의 지역적 이동성 관리 구조 틀에서 분석하고, 통합된 이기종 무선 네트워크 사이의 무선 인터페이스에서 최소 신호 오버헤드를 유지하는 가운데 핸드오버 지연과 관련된 핸드오버 성능을 더 향상 시키고자, 네트워크 기반 개체인 글로벌 이동접속 게이트웨이(G-MAG)로 최적화된 PMIPv6를 제안하고 분석하였다. 핸드오버 지연 감소 정도를 보여주기 위해서 단말 기반 MIPv6에서의 핸드오버 신호 절차를 네트워크 기반 프록시 MIPv6(PMIPv6)와 G-MAG로 보조된 빠른 PMIPv6와 비교하였다. 분석 결과, 핸드오버 지연이 유의하게 감소되었음을 확인하였다.

Mobility and quality of service (QoS) are becoming the more important issues in wireless communications. The traditional Internet service is expanding into new access media and applications. Since wireless communication services are accompanied by frequent handovers at remote sites, scalable and fast handover has become a prerequisite for ubiquitous communication. In this paper, the differentiated service (Diffserv) model is deployed in heterogeneous proxy mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) networks to satisfy the QoS guaranteed service and fast handover requirements. The operational procedures for QoS guaranteed global roaming are presented. In addition, QoS management and handover cost evaluation schemes based on a mobile host's movement scope are proposed. This paper analyzes the reduction in handover delay in a network-based localized mobility management framework. We propose and analyze a PMIPv6 optimized with a global mobile access gateway (G-MAG), which is a network-based entity, to further improve the handover performance in terms of handover delay while maintaining minimal signaling overhead in the air interface among converged heterogeneous wireless networks. The handover signaling procedures with host-based MIPv6 are compared with network-based proxy MIPv6 (PMIPv6) and fast PMIPv6 assisted by G-MAG to show how much handover delay reduction can be achieved. Analytical results show that the handover delay is significantly reduced.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. C. Perkins, "IP mobility support for IPv4," IETF RFC 3344, Aug. 2002.
  2. D. Johnson, C. Perkins, and J. Arkko, "Mobility Support in IPv6," IETF RFC 3775, June 2004.
  3. "Part 16: air interface for fixed and mobile broadband wireless access systems-amendment 2: physical and medium access control layers for combined fixed and mobile operation in licensed bands," IEEE Std 802.16e-2005, Feb. 2006.
  4. "Stage 2: architecture tenets, reference model and reference points. Part 2," WiMAX Forum Network Architecture, Feb. 2009.
  5. S. Gundavelli, K. Leung, V. Devarapalli, K. Chowdhury, and B. Patil, "Proxy mobile IPv6," IETF RFC 5213, Aug. 2008.
  6. R. Wakikawa and S. Gundavelli, "IPv4 Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6," IETF RFC 5844, May 2010.
  7. G. Giaretta, "Interaction between PMIPv6 and MIPv6: Scenarios and Related Issues," draftietf- netlmm-mip-interactions-06, May 2010.
  8. H. Soliman, C. Castellucia, K. Malki, and L. Bellier, "Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Mobility Management (HMIPv6)," IETF RFC 4140, Aug. 2005.
  9. R. Koodli, "Fast Handovers for Mobile IPv6," IETF RFC 4068, July 2005.
  10. A. Dutta, S. Das., D. Famolari, Y. Ohba, K. Taniuchi, V. Fajardo, R. M. Lopez, T. Kodama, and H. Schulzrinne, "Seamless proactive handover across heterogeneous access networks," Wireless Personal Communication, Vol. 43, Issue 3, pp. 837-835, Nov. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-007-9266-3
  11. C. Makaya and S. Pierre, "An Analytical Framework for Performance Evaluation of IPv6-Based Mobility Management Protocols," IEEE Trans. on wireless communications, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 972-983, March 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2008.060725
  12. K. Kong, W. Lee, Y. Han, M. Shin, and H. You, "Mobility management for All-IP mobile networks: mobile IPv6 vs. proxy mobile IPv6," IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 36-45, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2008.4492976
  13. K. Lee and Y. Mun, "Enhanced Cross-Layering Mobile IPv6 Fast Handover over IEEE 802.16e Network," will appear in IEICE Transaction on Communications.
  14. S. Ryu, K. Lee, and Y. Mun, "Optimized fast handover scheme in Mobile IPv6 networks to support mobile users for cloud computing," Journal of Supercomputing, published in Online First, DOI 10.1007/s11227-010-0459-2, June 2010.
  15. L. Magagula and H. A. Chan, "Optimized handover delay in Proxy Mobile IPv6 using IEEE802.21 MIH Services," Military Communications Conference, 2008. MILCOM 2008. IEEEpp.1-7,Nov.2008.
  16. J. Na, S. Ryu, K. Lee, and Y. Mun "Enhanced PMIPv6 Route Optimization Handover Using PFMIPv6," IEICE Trans. Commun. Vol. E93-B, No. 11, pp. 3144-3147, Nov. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1587/transcom.E93.B.3144
  17. R. Braden, D. Clark, and S. Shenker, "Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture: an Overview," IETF RFC 1643, June 1994.
  18. S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, and W. Weiss. "An Architecture for Differentiated Services," IETF RFC 2475, Dec. 1998.
  19. M. May, S. Blot, A. Jean-Marie, and C. Diot, "Simple Performance Models of Differentiated Services Schemes for the Internet," Infocom'99, vol. 3, pp. 1385-1394, March 1999.
  20. S. Bakiras and V. O. K. Li, "Efficient Resource Management for End-to-End QoS Guarantees in Diffserv Networks," 2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Vol. 2, pp. 1220-1224, April 2002.
  21. K. M. Yusof and N. Fisal, "Provisioning QoS in Differentiated Service Domain for MIPv6," 4th National Conference on Telecommunication Technology 2003, pp.98-101, January2003.
  22. R. Jain, T. Raleigh, C. Graff, and M. Reschinsky, "Mobile Internet Access and QoS Guarantees using Mobile IP and RSVP with Location Registers," ICC98, pp. 1690-1695, June 1998.
  23. A. Mahmoodian and G. Haring, "Mobile RSVP with dynamic Resource Sharing," IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference 2000, Vol. 2, pp. 896-901, September 2000.
  24. R. Chakravorty, M. D'Arienzo, I. Pratt, and J. Crowcroft. "A Framework for Dynamic SLA based QoS Control for UMTS," IEEE Wireless Communications, Special Issue on Merging IP and Wireless Networks, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 30-37, October 2003.
  25. L. Kleinrock, Queueing Systems, vol.1. J. Wiley & sons, 1975.
  26. M. Kim, S. Park, and Y. Mun, "QoS Guaranteed Service Model in Mobile IPv6," SAM'03, Las Vegas, U.S., vol. 2, pp. 502-507, June 2003.
  27. M. Kim and Y. Mun, "Cost Evaluation of Differentiated QoS Model in Mobile IPv6 Networks," ICCSA 2006, Glasgow, U.K., vol. 2, pp. 502-507, May 2006.