Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society

Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Evaluation of the KOrea Insecticide Exposure Model (KOIEM) for Managing Insecticides

  • Jung, Ja-Eun (Environmental Planning Institute, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Ju (Environmental Toxicology Research Center, Korea Institute of Toxicology) ;
  • Kim, Yoon-Kwan (Environmental & Whole Information System) ;
  • Lee, Sung-Kyu (Environmental Toxicology Research Center, Korea Institute of Toxicology)
  • Received : 2011.11.06
  • Accepted : 2011.12.30
  • Published : 2012.04.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The KOrea Insecticide Exposure Model (KOIEM) was developed to facilitate ecological risk-based management of Korean insecticides. KOIEM, applied as a multimedia fate model, evaluates water, soil, air, and vegetation compartments based on three water-body types (streams, ditches, and ponds). Deltamethrin, a pyrethroid insecticide, was used to evaluate and create the model parameters. After exposure of both the stream and the ditch to deltamethrin, the KOIEM-predicted concentrations and the observed levels were in agreement. The model was also evaluated using the accuracy factor (AF), which was 4.32 and 0.35 for the stream and ditch, respectively. Ecological risk assessment was also performed to evaluate the application of KOIEM for four popular South Korean insecticides (cypermethrin, deltamethrin, diazinon, and permethrin). Despite the insecticides having low PECs in water, their risk quotients were typically above 1.0. Thus, KOIEM modification would be required in further studies to account for spatial variation.

Keywords

References

  1. US Environmental Protection Agency. (GEN)ERIC (E)STIMATED (E)NVIRONMENTAL (C)ONCENTRATION MODEL User's manual. 2001. http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/ geneec2_users_manual.htm
  2. Burns, L. Exposure Analysis Modeling System: Users Guide for EXAMS II version 2.94, Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA. 1991.
  3. FOCUS. FOCUS surface water scenarios in the EU evaluation process under 91/44/EEC. Report of the FOCUS surface water scenarios working group. 2001. EC document reference Sanco/ 480/2001, 245. http://focus.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sw/index.html
  4. Inao, K.; Ishi, I. Y.; Kobara, Y.; Kitamura, Y. J. Pest. Sci. 2001, 26, 229. https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.26.229
  5. Watanabe, H.; Takagi, K. Environ. Technol. 2000, 21, 1379. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593332208618167
  6. Miap, Z.; Cheplick, J. M.; Williums, M. W.; Trevisan, M.; Padovani, L.; Gennari, M.; Ferrero, A.; Vidotto, F.; Capri, E. J. Environ. Qual. 2003, 32, 2189. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2003.2189
  7. Mckone, T.; Enoch, K. CalTOX (registered trademark), A multimedia total exposure model spreadsheet user's guide. Version 4.0(Beta). Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Berkeley, CA, USA. 2002. Paper LBNL-47399. http://repositories.cdlib.org/lbnl/LBNL-47399.
  8. Jolliet, O.; Margni, M.; Charles, R.; Humbert, S.; Payet, J.; Rebitzer, G.; Rosenbaum, R. Int. J. Life Cycle Ass. 2003, 8(6), 324. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978505
  9. Juraske, R.; Anton, A.; Castells, F.; Huijbregts, M. Chemosphere 2007, 67(6), 1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.11.047
  10. Korea Food & Drug Administration. Monitoring research on actual state of biocides used for prevention of epidemics. 2004.
  11. Laskowski, D. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2002, 174, 49.
  12. ATSDR. Toxicological profile for pyrethrins and pyrethroids. Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2003. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp155.pdf.
  13. Bradbury, S.; Coats, J. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1989, 108, 133. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8850-0_4
  14. Gear, C. Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1971.
  15. Birkveda, M.; Hauschild, M. Ecol. Model. 2006, 198, 433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.035
  16. Teske, M.; Bird, S.; Esterly, D.; Curbishley, T.; Ray, S. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2002, 21, 659. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620210327
  17. EPPO, Chapter 12: Air in 'Decision-making scheme for the environmental risk assessment of plant protection products' (draft version). European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation, Council of Europe, 96/5543, 1996.
  18. Nuyttens, D.; Schampheleire, M.; Verboven, P.; Sonck, B. Biosystem Engineering 2010, 105, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.08.004
  19. Tinarelli, G.; Anfossi, D.; Bider, M.; Ferrero, E.; Trini Castelli, S. A new high performance version of the Lagrangian particle dispersion model SPRAY, some case studies. In: S.E. Gryning and E. Batchvarova, Editors, Air Pollution Modelling and its Applications XIII, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, New York. 2000.
  20. Wark, K.; Warner, C.; Davis, W. Air Pollution: Its Origin and Control (3rd ed.) Addison-Wesley: U.S.A. 1998.
  21. Kidd, H.; James, D. R., Eds.; The Agrochemicals Handbook (3rd ed). Royal Society of Chemistry Information Services, Cambridge, UK, 1991, pp 3-11.
  22. Muir, D.; Rawn, G.; Grift, N. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1985, 33, 603. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00064a011
  23. Tomlin, C. The Pesticide Manual, 10th Ed. Thornton Heath, British Crop Protection Council/Cambridge, The Royal Society of Chemistry 1994; p 51-52.
  24. TOXNET Hazardous Substances Data Bank. http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/
  25. Brady, N.; Weil, R. The Nature and Properties of Soils (14th Ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 2008.
  26. Jung, J.; Lee, D.; Kim, S.; Kim, D.; Kim, S.; Kim, J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 8056. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1017416
  27. Lee, Y.; Kim, Y.; Kim, K.; Lee, D. Integrated Environ. Asses. Manag. 2008, 3, 508-516.
  28. US Environmental Protection Agency. Estimation Program Interface (EPI) Suite Exposure Assessment Branch, Washington, USA. 2010-2011. http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/exposure/pubs/episuite.htm
  29. SPARC on-line calculator. http://archemcalc.com/sparc/
  30. US Environmental Protection Agency. Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. Risk assessment forum. Washington DC: US EPA. EPA 630/R-95/002F. 1998. http://www.epa.gov/raf/publications/ pdfs/ECOTXTBX.PDF.
  31. European Commission. Technical Guidance Documents on Risk Assessment in Support of the Risk Assessment Directive (93/67/ EEC) on Risk Assessment for New Notified Substance and Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1488/94 on Risk Assessment For Existing Substances. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels (BE). 1996.
  32. US Environmental Protection Agency. ECOTOX Database Program, Version 4. US Environmental Protection Agency, Mid-Continent Ecology Division, Duluth, USA. 1996. http://cfpub.epa.gov/ecotox/

Cited by

  1. Fungicide Field Concentrations Exceed FOCUS Surface Water Predictions: Urgent Need of Model Improvement vol.48, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1021/es4048329