DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

시판 라면류의 선택 속성이 만족도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 - 어린이 및 청소년을 중심으로 -

Effects of Instant Noodle (Ramyun)'s Selection Attribution upon Satisfaction - Focus on Children and Adolescents -

  • 정효선 (경희대학교 조리.서비스경영학과) ;
  • 윤혜현 (경희대학교 조리.서비스경영학과)
  • Jung, Hyo-Sun (Department of Culinary Service Management, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Yoon, Hye-Hyun (Department of Culinary Service Management, Kyung Hee University)
  • 투고 : 2011.08.09
  • 심사 : 2011.10.25
  • 발행 : 2012.02.29

초록

The purpose of this study was to understand the influence of instant noodle's selection attribution on satisfaction and to empirically analyze whether or not grade (elementary schoolchildren, middle school students, high school students) plays a moderating role in the relationship between selection attribution and satisfaction. Further, this study examined the differences in demographic characteristics among two groups of subjects divided by instant noodle's selection attribution. Based on a total of 1021 samples, this study verified a total of 3 hypotheses using the SPSS program. Data were analyzed by frequency analysis, chi-square, t-test, factor analysis, reliability analysis, cluster analysis, discriminant analysis, and hierarchical regression analysis. Results of the study were as follows. There were three different instant noodle's selection attributions among the children and adolescents investigated: internal element, external element, and company reliability. The multiple regression results show that internal element (=.391), external element (=.239), and company reliability (=.063) among customers' selection attributions had significant positive effects on satisfaction. In addition, the effect of selection attribution upon satisfaction was partially moderated according to grade. Further, cluster analysis divided subjects into two groups according to instant noodle's selection attribution: high-selection group vs. low-selection group. The wo groups of subjects classified by instant noodle's selection attribution were also different from each other in demographic characteristics. Limitations and future research directions are also discussed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anderson E, Fornell C, Lehman D. 1994. Customer satisfaction, market share and profitability: Findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing. 58(3):53-66 https://doi.org/10.2307/1252310
  2. Chae MJ, Bae HJ, Yoon JY. 2008. Consumption practices and selection attributes of the university students on ready-toeat foods. Journal of Foodservice Management. 11(2):287-307
  3. Cho YB. 2008. The effects of Kimchi product selection attribute on customer satisfaction and repurchase intent. The Korean Journal of Culinary Research. 14(4):203-216
  4. Chung JE, Lee KW, Cho MS. 2010. Effect of Ramyen and noodles intake in diet & health status of Koreans. Journal of the Korean Society of Dietary Culture. 25(2):109-116
  5. Chung LN, Lee HY, Yang IS. 2007. What's the consideration attribute on purchasing the HMR? Journal of the Korean Society of Dietary Culture. 22(3):315-322
  6. Fishbein M. 1967. A Behavioral Theory Approach to the Relationship between Beliefs about an Object and the Attitude Toward the Object. in Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement, ed. Martin Fishbein, NY: Wiley, 389-400
  7. Hauser JR, Steven MS. 1983. Defensive marketing strategies. Marketing Science. 2(4):319-360 https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2.4.319
  8. Jang YJ, Kim, Bonn MA. 2011. Generation Y consumers' selection attributes and behavioral intentions concerning green restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 30(4):803-811 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.12.012
  9. Jang YJ. 2009. Mature consumers' consumption patterns and selection attributes regarding home meal replacement (HMR). Journal of Foodservice Management. 12(5):97-119
  10. Jung KJ. 2009. Effects of food selection attribute on postpurchase consumer behavior in big discount stores. The Korean Journal of Culinary Research. 15(3):248-261
  11. Kim JS, Ha KS. 2010. Selection attributes and pursuit benefits of processed fishery products. Journal of the Korean Society of Dietary Culture. 25(2):516-524
  12. Kim KH, Han YS. 2010. A study on market segmentation by selection attributes of tea consumers. Journal of the Korean Tea Society. 16(2):1-12
  13. Kotler P, Bowen J, Makens J. 1996. Marketing for Hospitality and Tourism. NY: Prentice-Hall
  14. Lee JS, Kim JS, Hong KH, Jang YA, Park SH, Sohn YA, Chung HR. 2009. A comparison of food and nutrient Intakes between Instant noodle consumers and non-consumers among Korean children and adolescents. The Korean Journal of Nutrition. 42(8):723-731 https://doi.org/10.4163/kjn.2009.42.8.723
  15. Lee JW, Lee YH. 2003. Frequency of instant noodle (Ramyeon) intake and food value recognition, and their relationship to blood lipid levels of male adolescents in rural area. Korean Journal of Community Nutrition. 8(4):485-494
  16. Lewis RC. 1981. Restaurant advertising: Appeals and consumers' intention. Journal of Advertising Research. 21(5):69-74
  17. Lim BH, Ahn KH, Joo YW. 2003. The empirical study of the relative influence of brand personality and product attributes in the brand choice. Korean Marketing Review. 18(4):1-21
  18. Moon HS, Lee HC. 2005. Service Choice Attributes as Determinants in Choosing Different Types of Restaurants. Journal of Foodservice Management 8(3):201-220
  19. Nosofsky RM. 1988. Similarity, frequency, and category representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 14(1):54-65 https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.1.54
  20. Nunnally JC. 1978. Psychometric Theory. NY: McGraw-Hill
  21. Spreng RA, MacKenzie SB, Olshavsky RW. 1996. A reexamination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing. 60(July):15-32 https://doi.org/10.2307/1251839
  22. Suk KH. 2008. The moderating role of product familiarity on the relationship between attribute similarity and choice. Korean Marketing Review 23(3):57-73

피인용 문헌

  1. Association of instant noodle intake with metabolic factors in Korea: Based on 2013~2014 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey vol.49, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2016.49.4.247