Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society

Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Interfacial Natures and Controlling Morphology of Co Oxide Nanocrystal Structures by Adding Spectator Ni Ions

  • Received : 2011.10.19
  • Accepted : 2011.12.06
  • Published : 2012.02.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Cobalt oxide nanostructure materials have been prepared by adding several concentrations of spectator Ni ions in solution, and analyzed by electron microscopy, X-day diffraction, calorimetry/thermogravimetric analysis, UV-vis absorption, Raman, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The electron microscopy results show that the morphology of the nanostructures is dramatically altered by changing the concentration of spectator ions. The bulk XRD patterns of $350^{\circ}C$-annealed samples indicate that the structure of the cobalt oxide is all of cubic Fd-3m $Co_3O_4$, and show that the major XRD peaks shift slightly with the concentration of Ni ions. In Raman spectroscopy, we can confirm the XRD data through a more obvious change in peak position, broadness, and intensity. For the un-sputtered samples in the XPS measurement process, the XPS peaks of Co 2p and O 1s for the samples prepared without Ni ions exhibit higher binding energies than those for the sample prepared with Ni ions. Upon $Ar^+$ ion sputtering, we found $Co_3O_4$ reduces to CoO, on the basis of XPS data. Our study could be further applied to controlling morphology and surface oxidation state.

Keywords

References

  1. Xie, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z. Q.; Haruta, M.; Shen, W. Nature 2009, 458, 746. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07877
  2. Liotta, L. F.; Deganello, G.; Di Carlo, G.; Pantaleo, G.; Venezia, A. M. Curr. Top. Catal. 2008, 7, 77.
  3. Wang, W.; Li, Y.; Zhang, R.; He, D.; Liu, H.; Liao, S. Catal. Commun. 2011, 12(10), 875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2011.02.001
  4. Xu, C.-X.; Liu, Y.-Q.; Zhou, C.; Wang, L.; Geng, H.-R.; Ding, Y. ChemCatChem 2011, 3(2), 399. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201000275
  5. Zheng, J.; Chu, W.; Zhang, H.; Jiang, C.; Dai, X. J. Nat. Gas Chem. 2010, 19(6), 583. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-9953(09)60119-5
  6. Sun, S.; Gao, Q.; Wang, H.; Zhu, J.; Guo, H. Appl. Catal. B 2010, 97(1-2), 284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.04.016
  7. Hu, L.; Peng, Q.; Li, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130(48), 16136. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja806400e
  8. Li, H.; Fei, G. T.; Fang, M.; Cui, P.; Guo, X.; Yan, P.; Zhang, L. D. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257(15), 6527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.02.066
  9. Gui, Z.; Zhu, J.; Hu, Y. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2010, 124(1), 243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.06.025
  10. Askarinejad, A.; Bagherzadeh, M.; Morsali, A. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256(22), 6678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.04.069
  11. Nguyen, H.; El-Safty, S. A. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115(17), 8466. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp1116189
  12. Na, C. W.; Woo, H.-S.; Kim, I.-D.; Lee, J.-H. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47(18), 5148. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cc05256f
  13. Christy, M.; Jisha, M. R.; Kim, A. R.; Nahm, K. S.; Yoo, D. J.; Suh, E. K.; Kumari, T. S. D.; Kumar, T. P.; Stephan, A. M. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2011, 32, 1204. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2011.32.4.1204
  14. Jia, W.; Guo, M.; Zheng, Z.; Yu, T.; Rodriguez, E. G.; Wang, Y.; Lei, Y. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2009, 625(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2008.09.020
  15. Xue, X.-Y.; Yuan, S.; Xing, L.-L.; Chen, Z.-H.; He, B.; Chen, Y. - J. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4718. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cc10462d
  16. Wu, Z. S.; Ren, W.; Wen, L.; Gao, L.; Zhao, J.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, G.; Li, F.; Cheng, H. M. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3187. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn100740x
  17. Guo, B.; Li, C.; Yuan, Z.-Y. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114(29), 12805. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp103705q
  18. Wang, X.; Wu, X.-L.; Guo, Y.-G.; Zhong, Y.; Cao, X.; Ma, Y.; Yao, J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20(10), 1680. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200902295
  19. Jiao, F.; Frei, H. Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 1873. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.200805534
  20. Park, J. P.; Park, J. Y.; Hwang, C. H.; Choi, M.-H.; Ok, K. M.Shim, I.-W. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2010, 31, 2327.
  21. Frei, H. Chimia 2009, 63(11), 721. https://doi.org/10.2533/chimia.2009.721
  22. Risch, M.; Khare, V.; Zaharieva, I.; Gerencser, L.; Chernev, P.; Dau, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131(20), 6936. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja902121f
  23. Wang, G.; Liu, H.; Horvat, J.; Wang, B.; Qiao, S.; Park, J.; Ahnidl, H. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16(36), 11020. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201000562
  24. Li, C. C.; Yin, X. M.; Wang, T. H.; Zeng, H. C. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21(20), 4984. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm902126w
  25. Ma, C. Y.; Mu, Z.; Li, J. J.; Jin, Y. G.; Cheng, J.; Lu, G. Q.; Hao, Z. P.; Qiao, S. Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132(8), 2608. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja906274t
  26. Zeng, R.; Wang, J.-Q.; Chen, Z.-X.; Li, W.-X.; Dou, S.-X. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 9(7), 07B520/1.
  27. Cao, F.; Wang, D.; Deng, R.; Tang, J.; Song, S.; Lei, Y.; Wang, S.; Su, S.; Yang, X.; Zhang, H. CrystEngComm 2011, 13(6), 2123. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0ce00392a
  28. Xu, C.; Sun, J.; Gao, L. CrystEngComm 2011, 13(5), 1586. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0ce00311e
  29. Liang, H.; Raitano, J. M.; Zhang, L.; Chan, S.-W. Chem. Commun. 2009, 48, 7569.
  30. Cui, L.; Li, J.; Zhang, X.-G. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2009, 39(10), 1871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-009-9891-5
  31. Yang, J.; Sasaki, T. Cryst. Growth Des. 2010, 10(3), 1233. https://doi.org/10.1021/cg9012284
  32. Feng, J.; Zeng, H. C. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 2829. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm020940d
  33. Langford, J. I.; Wilson, A. J. C. J. Appl. Cryst. 1978, 11, 102. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889878012844
  34. Wang, C.-B.; Lin, H.-K.; Tang, C.-W. Catal. Lett. 2004, 1-2, 69.
  35. Gupta, R. K.; Sinha, A. K.; Raja Sekhar, B. N.; Srivastava, A. K.; Singh, G.; Deb, S. K. Appl. Phys. A 2011, 103, 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-011-6311-6
  36. He, T.; Chen, D.; Jiao, X.; Wang, Y.; Duan, Y. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 4023. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm050727s
  37. Xu, R.; Zeng, H. C. Langmuir 2004, 20, 9780. https://doi.org/10.1021/la049164+
  38. Zhang, Y. B.; Srirharan, T.; Li, S. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 73, 172404. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.172404
  39. Gallant, D.; Pezolet, M.; Simard, S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 6871. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp056689h
  40. Hadjievl, V. G.; Ilievl, M. N.; Vergilovs, I. V. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 1988, 21, Ll99-L201.
  41. Boucharda, M.; Gambardellab, A. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2010, 41, 1477. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.2645
  42. Xu, C.; Liu, Y.; Xu, G.; Wang, G. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 366, 567. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(02)01640-8
  43. Sohn, Y. Appl. Suf. Sci. 2010, 257, 1692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.08.124
  44. Petitto, S. C.; Langell, M. A. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2004, 22, 1690. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.1763899
  45. Barreca, D.; Gasparotto, A.; Lebedev, O. I.; Maccato, C.; Pozza, A.; Tondello, E.; Turner, S.; Tendeloo, G. V. CrystEngComm 2010, 12, 2185. https://doi.org/10.1039/b926368n
  46. Yang, J.; Hyodo, H.; Kimura, K.; Sasaki, T. Nanotech. 2010, 21, 045605. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/21/4/045605
  47. Li, Y.; Hasin, P.; Wu, Y. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 1926. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200903896

Cited by

  1. A bubble-template approach for assembling Ni–Co oxide hollow microspheres with an enhanced electrochemical performance as an anode for lithium ion batteries vol.18, pp.37, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP04097G
  2. Thermolysis Synthesis of Pure Phase Nano-Sized Cobalt(II) Oxide from Novel Cobalt(II)-Pyrazole Discrete Nano Coordination Compound vol.26, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-016-0326-6
  3. Al-Co Alloys Prepared by Vacuum Arc Melting: Correlating Microstructure Evolution and Aqueous Corrosion Behavior with Co Content vol.6, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/met6030046
  4. One for all: cobalt-containing polymethacrylates for magnetic ceramics, block copolymerization, unexpected electrochemistry, and stimuli-responsiveness vol.7, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1039/C5PY01845E
  5. Fabrication of an MOF-derived heteroatom-doped Co/CoO/carbon hybrid with superior sodium storage performance for sodium-ion batteries vol.5, pp.29, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA03939E
  6. Structure Effects on Activity of Plasma Deposited Cobalt Oxide Catalysts for VOC Combustion vol.60, pp.3-5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-016-0618-7
  7. Robust hierarchical 3D carbon foam electrode for efficient water electrolysis vol.7, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05215-1
  8. Role of Hydrogen and Oxygen Activation over Pt and Pd-Doped Composites for Catalytic Hydrogen Combustion vol.9, pp.23, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b08019
  9. Enhancing Activity and Stability of Cobalt Oxide Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction via Transition Metal Doping vol.163, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0031611jes
  10. Are Electrospun Carbon/Metal Oxide Composite Fibers Relevant Electrode Materials for Li-Ion Batteries? vol.163, pp.14, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0351614jes
  11. Catalytic decomposition of N2O over CeO2 supported Co3O4 catalysts vol.128, pp.11, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12039-016-1180-3
  12. Unique multi-phase Co/Fe/CoFe2O4 by water-gas shift reaction, CO oxidation and enhanced supercapacitor performances vol.43, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.07.049
  13. Co3O4-CuCoO2 Nanomesh: An Interface-Enhanced Substrate that Simultaneously Promotes CO Adsorption and O2 Activation in H2 Purification vol.11, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b19478
  14. Boosting photochemical activity by Ni doping of mesoporous CoO nanoparticle assemblies vol.6, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1039/c8qi01324a
  15. Clustering-induced high magnetization in Co-doped TiO2 vol.2, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-019-00056-2
  16. Hierarchical Mesoporous/Macroporous Co-Doped NiO Nanosheet Arrays as Free-Standing Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Li-O2 Batteries vol.11, pp.47, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b13329
  17. CATALYST PREPARATION METHODS TO REDUCE CONTAMINANTS IN A HIGH-YIELD PURIFICATION PROCESS OF MULTIWALLED CARBON NANOTUBES vol.36, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-6632.20190364s20190251
  18. Contrasting Effects of Potassium Addition on M3O4 (M = Co, Fe, and Mn) Oxides during Direct NO Decomposition Catalysis vol.10, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10050561
  19. Shock Wave Driven Solid State Phase Transformation of Co3O4 to CoO Nanoparticles vol.124, pp.19, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c02146
  20. Synthesis of 2D cobalt oxide nanosheets using a room temperature liquid metal vol.10, pp.49, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra06010k
  21. Energy Storage and CO2 Reduction Performances of Co/Co2C/C Prepared by an Anaerobic Ethanol Oxidation Reaction Using Sacrificial SnO2 vol.10, pp.10, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10101116
  22. N-doped Co3O4 catalyst with a high efficiency for the catalytic decomposition of N2O vol.509, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2021.111656
  23. Photocatalytic and Electrocatalytic Properties of Cu-Loaded ZIF-67-Derivatized Bean Sprout-Like Co-TiO2/Ti Nanostructures vol.11, pp.8, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11081904
  24. Cobalt supported on carbon nanotubes for methane chemical vapor deposition for the production of new carbon nanotubes vol.45, pp.31, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1nj02442f
  25. Heteroatom-doped Co-MOF derivative enhancing immobilization and activity of two enzymes for small-molecules electrochemical determination vol.172, pp.no.pb, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2021.106942