정신분석학을 이용한 루이스 칸과 렘 쿨하스의 건축 내부공간 구성 비교연구

A Comparative Study on the Inner Space Composition of a Building between Louis I. Kahn and Rem Koolhaas through Psychoanalysis

  • 투고 : 2012.08.29
  • 심사 : 2012.10.12
  • 발행 : 2012.10.31

초록

The purposes of this study were to compare Louis I. Kahn and Rem Koolhaas, both of whom established their architectural theories and granted rationality to them by applying the theory of psychoanalysis, and examine common and different characteristics in the inner space composition of a building between them. The study also set out to confirm a basic premise based on which to develop a metaphysical design concept by applying the theory of psychoanalysis in the inner space composition of contemporary architecture in future from the more developed and integrated perspective of modern psychoanalysis. As a result, Kahn sought after a metaphysical design concept through the combinations of inner unit spaces including servant and served space, which are comparable to the confrontation between consciousness and unconsciousness from the perspective of psychoanalysis. Unlike him, Koolhaas applied the concept of folding to his architectural plans based on the theory of post-structuralism and created a metaphysical design concept by more focusing on connections between unit spaces rather than their combinations. While Kahn worked on his designs with much interest in the combinations of inner unit spaces in horizontal circulation by separating it from vertical circulation, Koolhaas created a new design concept beyond the limitations of Kahn, who had a confronting, dichotomous view of the world between the phenomenal world and the metaphysical world, by making use of inclined slabs to connect upper slabs with lower ones. The findings show that there can be various metaphysical design concepts depending on how to connect and combine two confronting concepts when applying the theory of psychoanalysis to architectural design.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. A. Tyng, 루이스 칸의 건축철학(Louis I. Kahn's Philosophy of Architecture), 서유석.이강주 역, 태림문화사, 1993.12
  2. Kent Larson, Louis I. Kahn, Unbuilt Masterworks, The Monacelli Press, 2000
  3. Rem Koolhaas 외 2人, Elcroquis-OMA, REM KOOLHAAS II 1987-1998, El Croquis, 2000
  4. Rem Koolhass, Anywhere-4. 공간의 논리, 현대건축사, 2001
  5. Stephen A. Mitchell & Magraret J. Black, 프로이트 이후-현대정신분석학, 이재훈.이해리 역, 한국심리치료연구소, 2002
  6. 이부영, 분석심리학-C.G.jung의 인간심성론, 일조각, 1999.
  7. R.Greenberg & Stephen A. Mitchell, 정신분석학적 대상관계이론(Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory, 이재훈 역, 한국심리치료연구소, 1999
  8. 박찬부, 현대정신분석비평, 민음사, 1996
  9. 최영아, Louis I. Kahn의 건축에 나타난 형태반복의 의미에 관한 연구, 한양대 박사논문, 2007.2
  10. 최효식, 건축구성원리의 정신분석학 적용연구, 홍익대 박사논문, 2008
  11. 최효식, 정신분석학에 의한 루이스 칸의 건축철학과 카발라와의 비교 연구, 한국건축역사학회 건축역사연구 제18권 2호, 2009.4
  12. 박하나, 들뢰즈의 주름론으로 본 해체주의 건축, 현대미술사학회 현대미술사연구 25권 1호, 2009
  13. 문정필, 렘 콜하스 건축의 이항대립에 관한 연구-롤랑 바르트 기호의 신화를 중심으로, 대한건축학회논문집(계획계) 27권 10호, 2011.10
  14. 장용순, 끌로드 빠항과 렘 콜하스의 경사판 개념에 대한 연구, 대한건축학회논문집(계획계) 26권 6호, 2010.6