DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Host plant, Nectar plant and Vegetation types on Butterfly Communities

먹이식물·흡밀식물·식생이 나비 군집에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2012.03.20
  • Accepted : 2012.09.18
  • Published : 2012.12.01

Abstract

The effects of number of host plants and nectar plants on the number and diversity of butterflies were monitored and analyzed by simple and multiple regression from May 2008 to Sep 2009 in the Bubjusa region (Mt. Sokri, Boeun-gun, Chungcheongbuk-do), which was divided into four regions. The results demonstrate that the number of butterflies has a positive correlation with the number of host plant species, the number of nectar plant species, and the number of host plants multiple regression analysis. The number of butterflies also increased habitat area. However, the butterfly species number and diversity index showed lower correlation with the number of host plants and the area size of the divided region, respectively, when analyzed by simple regression. In addition, increased species diversity in a region with more diverse plant flora. These results suggest that the composite distribution of host and nectar plants with diverse plant flora is required for butterfly diversity and population preservation. Additionally, it also suggest that vegetation types complementarity all factors.

본 연구는 먹이식물과 흡밀식물의 수 그리고 식생이 나비의 개체수 및 다양성에 미치는 영향을 조사하기 위하여 2008-09년까지 충북 보은군 속리산 법주사 지역을 4개 구간으로 나누어 모니터링을 실시하였으며 이를 단순회귀분석 및 다중회귀분석하였다. 그 결과 나비 개체수와 식물종수, 흡밀식물 그리고 먹이식물 수를 다중회귀분석 한 결과에서 상관관계를 보였으며, 서식지 면적이 클수록 개체수는 많아지는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 단순회귀 분석 시 나비의 종수와 다양도지수는 먹이식물 수 및 구간면적과 각각 낮은 상관관계를 나타냈다. 또한 보다 다양한 식생을 보이는 구간에서 나비 종수가 증가하였다. 나비의 다양성과 개체군 보전을 위해서는 다양한 수종의 식물과 함께 나비의 먹이식물과 흡밀식물이 복합적으로 분포하고, 식생은 각각의 요소들이 서로 보완관계를 유지할 수 있도록 다른 형태로 존재하는 것이 필요함을 시사한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Asher, J., Warren, M., Fox, R., Harding, P., Jeffcoate, G., Jeffcoate, S., 2001. The millennium atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland, Oxford University press, Oxford.
  2. Blair, R.B., Launer, A.E., 1997. Butterfly diversity and human land use: Species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biol. Conserv. 80: 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00056-0
  3. Christian, C.S., 1958. The concept of land unit and land systems. In Proc. 9th Pacific Science Congress 20: 74-81.
  4. Claridge, M.F., Wilson, M.R., 1982. Insect herbivore guilds and species-Area relationships: Leafminers on british trees. Ecol. Entomol. 7: 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1982.tb00640.x
  5. Darlington, P.J. Jr., 1959. Area, climate and evolution. Evolution 13: 488-510. https://doi.org/10.2307/2406131
  6. Davis, J.D., Debinski D.M., Danielson, B.J., 2007. Local and landscape effects on the butterfly community in fragmented Midwest USA prairie habitats. Landscape Ecol. 22: 1341-1354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-007-9111-9
  7. Debinski, D.M., 2006. Forest fragmentation and matrix effects: the matrix does matter. J. Biogeography 33: 1791-1792. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01596.x
  8. Dennis, R.L.H., Hodgson, J.G., Grenyer, R., Shreeve, T.G., Roy, D.B., 2004. Host plants and butterfly biology. Do host-plant strategies drive butterfly status? Ecol. Entomol. 29: 12-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2004.00572.x
  9. Dennis, R.L.H., Shreeve, T.G., Arnold, H.R., Roy, D.B., 2005. Does diet breadth control herbivorous insect distribution size? Life history and resource outlets for specialist butterflies. J. Insect Conserv. 9: 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-005-5660-x
  10. Ehrlice, P.R., Raven, P.H., 1964. Butterfly and plants: A study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586-608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2406212
  11. Erhardt, A., 1985. Diurnal lepidoptera: Sensitive indicators of cultivated and abandoned grassland. J. Appl. Ecol. 22: 849-861. https://doi.org/10.2307/2403234
  12. Gilbert, L.E., Singer, M.C., 1975. Butterfly ecology. Ann. Rev. Eco. Sys. 6: 365-397. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.06.110175.002053
  13. Greatorex-Davis, J.N., Hall, M.L., Sparks, T.H., Marrs, R.M., 1993. The influence of shade on butterflies in rides of coniferised lowland woods in southern England and implications for conservation management. Biol. Conserv. 63: 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(93)90070-H
  14. Haddad, N.M., Tewksbury, J.J., 2005. Low quality habitat corridors movement conduits for tow butterfly species. Ecol. Applicat. 15: 250-257. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-5327
  15. Harker, R.J., Shreeve, T.G., 2008. How accurate are single site transect data for monitoring butterfly trends? Spatial and temporal issues identified in monitoring Lasiommata megera. J. Insect Conserv. 12: 125-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-007-9068-7
  16. Heath, J., Pollard, P., Thomas, J.A., 1984. Atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland, Vicking, Penguin Books Ltd., Harmindsworth, England.
  17. Hunter, M.D., 2003. Effects of plant quality on the population ecology of parasitoids. Agricul. and Forest Entomol. 5: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-9563.2003.00168.x
  18. Hyun, T.H., Choi, S.W., 2003. Population dynamics of butterflies in a rural area, Muan-gun, Cheonnam. J. Environ. Res. 3: 84-88.
  19. Inoue, T., 2003. Chronosequential change in a butterfly community after clear-cutting of deciduous forests in a cool temperate region of central Japan. Entomol. Sci. 6: 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1343-8786.2003.00022.x
  20. Janson, S., Vegelius, J., 1981. Measures of ecological association. Oecologia 49: 371-376. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347601
  21. Joo, H.Z., Kim, S.S., Sohn, J.D., 1997. Butterflies of Korea in color, Kyohaksa, Seoul.
  22. Kim, C.W., 1976. Distribution atlas of insects of Korea, Korea university press, Seoul, Korea.
  23. Kim, D.S., Park, D.S., Kwon, Y.J., Suh, S.J., Kim, C.H., Park, S.J., Kim, D.H., Kim, J.S., Yu, H.M., Hwang, J.S., 2011a. Metapopulation structure and movement of a threatened butterfly Parnassius bremeri (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in Korea. Kor. J. Appl. Entomol. 50: 97-105. https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2011.03.0.12
  24. Kim, D.S., Yi, H.B., Kwon, Y.J., Woo, M.S., 2007. The butterfly community dynamics at Mt. Midong, Cheongwon-gun, Chungcheongbukdo, Korea. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 25: 319-325.
  25. Kim, D.S., Kwon, Y.J., 2010. Metapopulation dynamics of the oriental Long-tailed Swallow Sericinus montela (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in Korea. Kor. J. Appl. Entomol. 49: 289-297. https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2010.49.4.289
  26. Kim, S.S., Lee, C.M., Kwon, T.S., 2011b. The butterfly community in ls. Guleipdo, Korea and the dominance of the endangered species Argynnis nerippe. Kor. J. Appl. Entomol. 50: 115-123. https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2011.04.0.16
  27. Kim, S.S., Park, H.C., Kim, M.A., 1999. Monitoring the distribution and density of butterflies in Mt. Chugeum-san. J. Lepid. Soc. Kor. 12: 7-15.
  28. Kim, Y.S., 2002. Illustrated book of Korean butterflies in color, Kyohaksa, Seoul.
  29. Kitahara, M., Yumoto, M., Kobayashi, T., 2008. Relationship of butterfly diversity with nectar plant species richness in and around the Aokigahara primary woodland of Mount Fuji, central Jap. Biodivers. Conserv. 17: 2713-2734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-007-9265-4
  30. Kubo, M., Kobayashi, T., Kitahara, M., Hayashiet, A., 2009. Seasonal fluctuations in butterflies and nectar resources in a semi-natural grassland near Mt. Fuji, central Japan. Biodivers. Conserv. 18: 229-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9471-8
  31. Kusch, J., Goedert, C., Meyer, M., 2005. Effects of patch type and food specializations on fine spatial scale community patterns of nocturnal forest associated Lepidoptera. J. Res. Lepid. 38: 67-77.
  32. Kwon, T.S., Kim, S.S., Chun, J.H. Byun, B.K., Lim, J.H., Shin, J.H., 2010. Changes in butterfly abundance in response to global warming and reforestation. Environ. Entomol. 39: 337-345. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN09184
  33. Kyohaksa, 1998. Endangered and reserved wild species in Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  34. Lee, T.B., 2003. Coloured flora of Korea, Hyangmunsa, Seoul, Korea.
  35. Lee, Y.N., 2006. New Flora of Korea, Kyhaksa, Seoul, Korea.
  36. Lord, J.M., Norton, D.A., 1990. Scale and the spatial concept of fragmentation. Conserv. Biol. 4: 197-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00109.x
  37. Marini, L., Fontnaa, P., Battisti, A. Gaston, K.J., 2009. Agricultural management, vegetation traits and landscape drive orthopteran and butterfly diversity in a grassland-forest mosaic: a multi-scale approach. Insect Conserv. and Divers. 2: 213-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2009.00053.x
  38. Nimbalkar, R.K., Chandekar, S.K., Khunte, S.P., 2011. Butterfly diversity in relation to nectar food plants from Bhor Tahsil, Pune District, Maharashtra, India. J. Threatened Taxa 3: 1601-1609. https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o2612.1601-9
  39. Ockinger, E., Smith, H.G., 2006. Landscape composition and habitat area affects butterfly species richness in semi-natural grasslands. Oecologia 149: 526-534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0464-6
  40. Paek, M.K., Shin, Y.H., 2010. Butterflies of the Korean Peninsula. Nature and Ecology, Seoul.
  41. Park, K.T., Kim, S.S., 1997. Atlas of butterflies, Korea research institute of bioscience and biotechnology and center for insect systematics, Korea.
  42. Parmesan, C., Ryrholme, N., Stefanescu, C., Hill, J.K., Thomas, C.D., Descimon, H., Huntley, B., Kaila, L., Kullberg, J., Tammaru, T. Tennant, J., Thomas, J.A., Warren, M., 1999. Polewards shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399: 579-589. https://doi.org/10.1038/21181
  43. Pielou, E.C., 1970. An introduction to mathematical ecology, Wiley, New York.
  44. Pollard, E., 1984. Fluctuations in the abundance of butterflies, 1976-82. Ecol. Entomol. 9: 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1984.tb00713.x
  45. Pollard, E., Yates. T.J., 1993. Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation, Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
  46. Porter K., Steel, C.A., Thomas, J.A., 1992. Butterflies and communities, in: Dennis, R.L.H. (Eds.), The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp.137-177.
  47. Price, P.W., 2002. Resource-driven terrestrial interaction webs. Ecol. Res. 17: 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00483.x
  48. Pywell, R.F., Warman, E.A., Sparks, T.H., Greatorex-Davies, J.N., Walker, K.J., Meek, W.R., Carvell, C., Petit, S., Firbank, L.G., 2004. Assessing habitat quality for butterflies on intensively managed arable farmland. Biol. Conserv. 118: 313-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.09.011
  49. Reeder, K.F., Debinski, D.M., Danielson, B.J., 2005. Factors affecting butterfly use of filter strips in Midwestern USA. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 109: 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.02.016
  50. Ricketts, T.H., 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am. Nat. 158: 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1086/320863
  51. Ries, L., Debinski, D.M., 2001. Butterfly responses to habitat edges in the highly fragmented prairies of Central Iowa. J. Anim. Ecol. 70: 840-852. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00546.x
  52. Saarinen, K., Jantunen, J., 2005. Grassland butterfly fauna under traditional animal husbandry: contrasts in diversity in mown meadows and grazed pastures. Biodive. and Conserv. 14: 3201-3213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0387-7
  53. SAS-StatView 5.0.1., 1998. SAS institute Inc., second edition.
  54. Sawchik, J., Dufrêne, M., Lebrun, P., 2005. Distribution patterns and indicator species of butterfly assemblages of wet meadows in southern Belgium. Belg. J. Zool. 135: 43-52.
  55. Seok, D.M., 1973. The distribution maps of butterflies in Korea, Pochinchai, Seoul.
  56. Shin, Y.H., 1989. Coloured butterflies of Korea, Korean entomological institute, Academy, Seoul.
  57. Shepherd, S., Debinski, D.M., 2005. Evaluation of isolated and integrated prairie reconstructions as habitat for prairie butterflies. Biol. Conserv. 126: 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.021
  58. Simpson, E.H. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688-688. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0
  59. Singer, M.C., 1989. Butterfly-hostplant relationships: Host quality, adult choice and larval success, in: Vane-Wright, R.I., Ackey, P.R. (Eds.), The biology of butterflies. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, USA. pp. 81-88.
  60. Stoner, K.J.L., Joern, A., 2004. Landscapte vs. local habitat scale influences to insect communities from tallgrass prairie remnants. Ecol. Applicat. 14: 1306-1320. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-5112
  61. Thomas, J.A., 1983. A quick method of estimating butterfly numbers during surveys. Biol. Conserv. 27: 195-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(83)90019-8
  62. Thomas, J.A., Telfer, M.G., Roy, D.B., Preston, C.D., Greenwood, J.J.D., Asher, J., Fox, R., Clarke, R., Lawton, J.A., 2004. Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds and plants and global extinction crisis. Science 303: 1879-1881. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1095046
  63. Tolman, T., Lewington, R., 1997. Butterflies of Britain and Europe, HarperCollins, London.
  64. Valtonen, A., Saarinen, K., Jantunen, J., 2006. Effect of different mowing regimes on butterflies and diurnal moths on road verges. Anim. Biodiver. Conserv. 29: 133-148.
  65. Van Swaay, C.A.M., Nowicki, P., Settele, J., van Strien, A.J., 2008. Butterfly monitoring in Europe: methods, applications and perspectives. Biodivers Conserv. 17: 3455-3469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9491-4
  66. Warren, M.S., 1992. The conservation of british butterflies, in: Dennis, R.L.H. (Eds.), The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 246-274.
  67. Wiens, J.A., 1976. Population responses to patchy environments. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7: 81-120. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.07.110176.000501
  68. https://ecosurvey.nier.go.kr

Cited by

  1. The Faunae before and after Creating the Solbangjuk Wetland Ecological Park Located in Jecheon-City were Compared vol.42, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2014.42.3.035
  2. Comparison of Butterfly Communities between Guryongryeong and Gojigkyeong of the Baekdudaegan Mountain Range and the Changes in Their Distribution vol.54, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2015.06.0.008