Korean Management Science Review (경영과학)

The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society (한국경영과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Evaluation Method for Performance of Weapon System using Axiomatic Design based Inner Dependence AHP

공리적설계 기반의 내부종속 AHP를 이용한 국방무기 해외 구매사업의 무기성능 평가방법 개발

  • 조현기 (방위사업청 분석시험평가국) ;
  • 김우제 (서울과학기술대학교 글로벌융합산업공학과)
  • Received : 2012.05.03
  • Accepted : 2012.09.20
  • Published : 2012.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Test and evaluation of weapon system is an important task to evaluate the performance of overseas weapon system purchasing project. Especially, quantitative evaluation of performances is hardly completed in defense projects where multiple criteria are conflicted each other. In order to solve this problem, we apply Axiomatic Design (AD) and Inner Dependence AHP method. First, finite functional requirements (FRs) are categorized in hierarchy structure by selecting proper design parameters (DPs) to implement their corresponding FRs. If there are no ways to select DPs when design is coupled between FRs and DPs, then inner dependence is allowed to overcome the strict rule of independence in AHP. Second, the weights of DPs are calculated by applying both Inner Dependence AHP method for coupled design and normal AHP method for uncoupled or decoupled design. Finally, information axiom of AD is applied to the proposed weapon systems by calculating information contents for all parameters. Weapon system with minimum sum of information contents is considered as the best solution. The proposed method in this study should be used in multiple criteria decision making problems involving various conflicting criteria.

Keywords

References

  1. 강영주, 황윤동, 차성운, 정대진, 문용락, "공리적 설계에서 FRs의 상호 독립성을 정량적으로 측정하기 위한 도구의 개발", 한국정밀공학회지, 제18권, 제3호(2001), pp.122-130.
  2. 김상훈, "현대무기체계 시험평가제도 개선요인과 발전방안에 관한 연구", 박사학위논문, 서울산업대학교, 2008.
  3. 김찬수, 조규갑, "국방핵심기술 연구개발의 제안서 평가를 위한 평가지표 개발에 관한 연구", IE Interfaces, 제21권, 제1호(2008), pp. 96-108.
  4. 방위사업청 훈령 제170호 방위사업관리규정, 방위사업청, 2012.
  5. 이창효, 집단의사결정론, 세종출판사, 2000.
  6. 조현기, 김우제, "공리적설계/AHP를 이용한 해외무기체계 구매사업 제안서 평가지표 개발에 관한 연구", 한국군사과학기술학회지, 제14권, 제3호(2011), pp.441-457.
  7. 차성운, 박경진 공역, 공리적 설계(1), Suh, N.P.저, 동명사, 2009.
  8. Brown, C.A., "Teaching Axiomatic Design to Engineers-Theory, Applications and Software," Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol.24, No.3(2005), pp.186-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6125(06)80007-5
  9. Brown, C.A., "Decomposition and Prioritization in Engineering Design," Proceedings of ICAD2011, The Sixth International Conference on Axiomatic Design, Daejeon-March 30-31, ICAD-2011-07, (2011), pp.41-47.
  10. Cebi, S. and C. Kahraman, "Extension of Axiomatic Design Principles under Fuzzy Environment," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.37, No.3(2010), pp.2682-2689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.08.010
  11. Cebi, S. and C. Kahraman,, "Indicator Design for Passenger Car using Fuzzy Axiomatic Design Principles," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.37, No.9(2010), pp.6470-6481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.138
  12. Chen, C.H. and Y. Lin, "Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.142, No.1(2002), pp.174-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00280-6
  13. Cheng, C.H., "Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 96, No.2(1996), pp.343-350.
  14. Cheng, C.H., K.L. Yang, C.L. Hwang, "Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.116(1999), pp.423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00156-8
  15. Cochran, D.S., J.F. Arinez, J.W. Duda, and J. Linck, "A Decomposition Approach for Manufacturing System Design," Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol.20, No.6(2001), pp. 371-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6125(01)80058-3
  16. Dagdeviren, M., S. Yavuz, and N. Kilin, "Weapon selection using the AHP and TOP SIS methods under fuzzy environment," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.36(2009), pp.8143-8151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016
  17. Guenov, M.D. and S.G. Barker, "Application of axiomatic design and design structure Matrix to the decomposition of engineering systems," Systems Engineering, Vol.8, No.1 (2005), pp.29-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20015
  18. Ho, W., "Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications-A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.186(2008), pp.211-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004
  19. IHS Jane's Internet Homepage, www.janes.com, 2012.
  20. Kahraman, C. and S. Cebi, "A New Multiattribute Decision Making Method：Hierarchical Fuzzy Axiomatic Design," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.36(2009), pp. 4848-4861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.05.041
  21. Kulak, O., "A Decision Support System for Fuzzy Multi-attribute Selection of Material Handling Equipment," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.29, No.2(2005), pp.310-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.04.004
  22. Kulak, O., S. Cebi, and C. Kahraman, "Applications of Axiomatic Design Principles： A Literature Review," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.37(2010), pp.6705-6717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.03.061
  23. Kulak, O. and C. Kahraman, "Multi-attribute Comparison of Advanced Manufacturing Systems using Fuzzy vs. Crisp AD Approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.95(2005), pp.415-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.02.009
  24. Kulak, O. and C. Kahraman, "Fuzzy Multiattribute Selection among Transportation Companies using AD and AHP," Information Sciences, Vol.170(2005), pp.191-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2004.02.021
  25. Lee, J.W., S.H. Kang, J. Rosenberger, S.B. Kim, "A Hybrid Approach of Goal Programming for Weapon Systems Selection," Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 58(2010), pp.521-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2009.11.013
  26. Saaty, T.L., Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback：The Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1996.
  27. Suh, N.P., "Axiomatic Design Theory for Systems," Research in Engineering Design, Vol.10(1998), pp.189-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001639870001
  28. Vaidya, O.S. and S. Kumar, "Analytic hierarchy process：An overview of applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.169(2006), pp.1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
  29. Ohnishi, S., T. Yamanoi, H. Imai, "On a weight representation for inner dependence method AHP," ISCIII 2009 4th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, (2009), pp.113-117.