ETRI Journal

Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (한국전자통신연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Featured-Based Registration of Terrestrial Laser Scans with Minimum Overlap Using Photogrammetric Data

  • Renaudin, Erwan (Digital Photogrammetry Research Group, Department of Geomatic Engineering, University of Calgary) ;
  • Habib, Ayman (Digital Photogrammetry Research Group, Department of Geomatic Engineering, University of Calgary) ;
  • Kersting, Ana Paula (Digital Photogrammetry Research Group, Department of Geomatic Engineering, University of Calgary)
  • Received : 2010.12.17
  • Accepted : 2011.07.01
  • Published : 2011.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Currently, there is a considerable interest in 3D object reconstruction using terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) systems due to their ability to automatically generate a considerable amount of points in a very short time. To fully map an object, multiple scans are captured. The different scans need to be registered with the help of the point cloud in the overlap regions. To guarantee reliable registration, the scans should have large overlap ratio with good geometry for the estimation of the transformation parameters among these scans. The objective of this paper is to propose a registration method that relaxes/eliminates the overlap requirement through the utilization of photogrammetrically reconstructed features. More specifically, a point-based procedure, which utilizes non-conjugate points along corresponding linear features from photogrammetric and TLS data, will be used for the registration. The non-correspondence of the selected points along the linear features is compensated for by artificially modifying their weight matrices. The paper presents experimental results from simulated and real datasets to illustrate the feasibility of the proposed procedure.

Keywords

References

  1. R.R. Roderick and Y. Fujimoto, "Digital Processing of Dynamic Imagery for Photogrammetric Applications," IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 33, no. 1, Mar. 1984, pp. 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.1984.4315150
  2. P.J. Besl and N.D. McKay, "A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes," IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 14, no. 2, Feb. 1992, pp. 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.121791
  3. K. Bae and D. Lichti, "Automated Registration of Unorganised Point Clouds from Terrestrial Laser Scanners," Int. Archives Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. 35, part B5, July 2004, pp. 222-227.
  4. M. Fabris et al., "High Resolution Data From Laser Scanning and Digital Photogrammetry Terrestrial Methodologies. Test Site: An Architectural Surface," Int. Archives Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. 38, 3/W8, Sept. 2009, pp. 43-48.
  5. K. Al-Manasir and C. Fraser, "Registration of Terrestrial Laser Scanner Data Using Imagery," Photogrammetric Record, vol. 21, no. 115, 2006, pp. 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9730.2006.00379.x
  6. P. Ronnholm et al. "Registration of Airborne Laser Scanning Point Cloud with Aerial Images Through Terrestrial Image Block," Int. Archives Photogrammetry, Remote. Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. 37, part B1, July 2008, pp. 473-481.
  7. A. Habib et al., "Using Ground Based Laser Scanners to Establish the Orientation of Terrestrial Imagery," Proc. Optical 3D Meas. Tech. VI, vol. 1, Sept. 2002, pp. 306-314.
  8. F. Nex and F. Rinaudo, "New Integration Approach of Photogrammetric and LiDAR Techniques for Architectural Surveys," Int. Archives Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. 38, 3/W8, Sept. 2009, pp. 12-17.
  9. A. Habib and T. Schenk, "New Approach for Matching Surface from Laser Scanners and Optical Sensors," Int. Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. 32, 3/W14, Nov. 1999, pp. 55-61.
  10. E. Baltsavias, "A Comparison Between Photogrammetry and Laser Scanning," ISPRS J. Photogrammetry, Remote Sens., vol. 54, no. 2/3, 1999, pp. 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716(99)00014-3
  11. G. Vosselman et al., "Recognizing Structure in Laser Scanner Point Clouds," Int. Archives Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. 46, 8/W2, Oct. 2004, pp. 33-38.
  12. N. Meierhold and A. Schimch, "Referencing of Images to Laser Scanning Data Using Linear Features Extracted from Digital Images and Range Images," Int. Archives Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. 38, 3/W8, Sept. 2009, pp. 164-170.
  13. L. Brown, "A Survey of Image Registration Techniques," ACM Comput. Surveys, vol. 24, no. 4, 1992, pp. 325-376. https://doi.org/10.1145/146370.146374
  14. A. Habib, M. Ghanma, and M. Tait, "Integration of LiDAR and Photogrammetry for Close Range Applications," Int. Archives Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., vol. 35, Part B5, July 2004.
  15. A. Habib et al., "Integration of Photogrammetry and LiDAR Data in a Multi-primitive Triangulation," Conf. American Soc. Photogrammetry Remote Sens., Tampa, Florida, May 7-11, 2007.
  16. E.M. Mikhail and F. Ackerman, Observations and Least Squares, New York: University Press of America, 1976.
  17. A. Habib et al., "Alternative Methodologies for the Internal Quality Control of Parallel LiDAR Strips," IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., vol. 48, part 1, pp. 221-236.

Cited by

  1. A Closed-Form Solution for Coarse Registration of Point Clouds Using Linear Features vol.142, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)su.1943-5428.0000174
  2. Facet Segmentation-Based Line Segment Extraction for Large-Scale Point Clouds vol.55, pp.9, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2016.2639025
  3. Entropy-Based Registration of Point Clouds Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Smartphone GPS vol.17, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/s17010197
  4. Automatic hierarchical registration of aerial and terrestrial image-based point clouds vol.51, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2018.1444946
  5. Bias Impact Analysis and Calibration of UAV-Based Mobile LiDAR System with Spinning Multi-Beam Laser Scanner vol.8, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/app8020297
  6. Simultaneous System Calibration of a Multi-LiDAR Multicamera Mobile Mapping Platform vol.11, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1109/jstars.2018.2812796
  7. Fully Automated Profile-based Calibration Strategy for Airborne and Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR Systems with Spinning Multi-beam Laser Units vol.12, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030401
  8. LiDAR-Aided Interior Orientation Parameters Refinement Strategy for Consumer-Grade Cameras Onboard UAV Remote Sensing Systems vol.12, pp.14, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142268
  9. Development of a Miniaturized Mobile Mapping System for In-Row, Under-Canopy Phenotyping vol.13, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13020276
  10. Comparative Analysis of Different Mobile LiDAR Mapping Systems for Ditch Line Characterization vol.13, pp.13, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132485
  11. A Closed-Form Solution to Linear Feature-Based Registration of LiDAR Point Clouds vol.13, pp.18, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13183571
  12. Processing Strategy and Comparative Performance of Different Mobile LiDAR System Grades for Bridge Monitoring: A Case Study vol.21, pp.22, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21227550