DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of Mathematical Creativity in Mathematical Modeling

  • Received : 2011.04.25
  • Accepted : 2011.06.20
  • Published : 2011.06.30

Abstract

In mathematical modeling tasks, where students are exposed to model-eliciting for real and open problems, students are supposed to formulate and use a variety of mathematical skills and tools at hand to achieve feasible and meaningful solutions using appropriate problem solving strategies. In contrast to problem solving activities in conventional math classes, math modeling tasks call for varieties of mathematical ability including mathematical creativity. Mathematical creativity encompasses complex and compound traits. Many researchers suggest the exhaustive list of criterions of mathematical creativity. With regard to the research considering the possibility of enhancing creativity via math modeling instruction, a quantitative scheme to scale and calibrate the creativity was investigated and the assessment of math modeling activity was suggested for practical purposes.

Keywords

References

  1. Crawford, K.; Gordon, S.; Nicholas, J. & Prosser, M. (1994). Conceptions of Mathematics and how it is learned: The perspectives of students entering University. Learning and Instruction 4, 331-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90005-1
  2. Eric L. Mann (2009). The Search for Mathematical Creativity: Identifying Creative Potential in Middle School Students. Creativity Research Journal 21(4), 338-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410903297402
  3. Ervynck, G. (1991). Mathematical creativity. In: D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 42-53) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publ. ME 1993b.02231
  4. Greer, B. (1997). Modeling reality in mathematical classrooms. The case of word problems. Learn. Instr. 7(4), 293-307. ME 1998e.03689 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00006-6
  5. Larson, L. (2000). Problem-Solving Through Problems. New York, NY: Springer. ME 1991l.01700
  6. Haylocck, D. (1997). Recognizing mathematical creativity in school children. ZDM Mathematical Education 27(2), 68-74.
  7. Jesper Boesen (2006). Assessing Mathematical Creativity. Doctoral thesis 34, Umea University.
  8. Leikin, R. & Lev, M. (2007). Multiple solution Tasks as a Magnifying Glass for Observation of Mathematical Creativity. ME 2008c.00249
  9. Leikin R.; Berman, A. & Koichu, B. (2009). Creativity in Mathematics and Education of Gifted Students. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. ME 2010c.00040
  10. Martin, L. C.; Towers, J. & Pirie, S. E. B. (2006). Collective mathematical understanding as improvisation. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 8(2), 149-183. ERIC EJ733808 ME 2006c.01542 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0802_3
  11. Niss & Jensen (Eds.) (2006). Competencies and Mathematical Learning -Ideas and inspiration for the development of mathematics teaching and learning in Denmark. English translation of part I-VI Niss & Jensen (2002).
  12. Sriraman, B. & Lesh, R. (2006). Modeling conceptions revisited. ZDM, Zentralbl. Didakt. Math. 38(3), 247-254. ME 2006f.03878 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652808
  13. Wu & Adams (2006). Modeling Mathematics Problem Solving Item Responses Using a Multidimensional IRT Model, Vol. Math Education Research Journal 18(2), 93-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217438
  14. Zbigniew, M. & David .B. F. (2002). How to solve it. Modern Heuristics Springer.