Korean Journal of Child Studies (아동학회지)

Korean Association of Child Studies (한국아동학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Validation of the Penn Interactive Peer Play Scale for Korean Young Children with a Special Focus on Confirmatory Factor Analysis

확인적 요인분석을 통한 또래 놀이행동 척도의 타당화

  • 최혜영 (창원대학교 아동가족학과) ;
  • 신혜영 (한양사이버대학교 아동학과)
  • Received : 2010.12.31
  • Accepted : 2011.03.25
  • Published : 2011.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Penn Interactive Peer Play Scale (PIPPS) for Korean young children, with a special confirmative factor analysis. The participants were composed of 435 5-to 6-year-old children and their parents, and 42 teachers. The instruments included the 32-item exploratory PIPPS (Choi & Shin, 2008), the Preschool Behavior Questionnaire (PBQ; Park, 1992), and the PIPPS on parental reporting. The PIPPS was confirmed, and supported the following constructs resulting in the investigation of 3 factors, 'play disruption', 'play interaction', and 'play disconnection', along with 30 items similar to the PIPPS (2008). Inter-correlations between the sub-factors of PIPPS with those of criterion measures were validated by ratings from the PBQ and the parent version of the PIPPS. The reliability coefficients of the sub-factors of the PIPPS ranged from .85 to .92. In conclusion, 3 factor structure of the PIPPS was appropriate to represent the interactive peer play of Korean young children.

Keywords

References

  1. 김수영(2000). 유아의 또래수용도, 놀이상호작용 및 놀이형태와의 관계. 유아교육연구, 22(3), 47-65.
  2. 김윤희(2010). 유아 또래관계 관련 국내 학술지 논문의 연구동향 분석：연구방법을 중심으로(1995년-2009년). 아동학회지, 31(5), 131-149.
  3. 노형진(2007). SPSS/AMOS에 의한 사회조사분석-범주형 데이터 분석 및 공분산구조분석. 서울: 형설출판사.
  4. 박경자(1992). 영유아기 타인 양육이 학령 전 어린이의 사회.정서적 행동에 미치는 영향. 아동학회지, 13(2), 217-227.
  5. 배도희.오경자(2010). 한국판 CBCL 공격행동 척도의 하위 2요인 모형탐색. 한국심리학회：학교, 7(3), 371-390.
  6. 정대현(2005). 유아의 또래 상호작용.유아-교사관계.다중지능과 초등학교 적응간의 관계. 전남대학교 박사학위 청구논문.
  7. 정대현.지성애(2006). 유아의 또래 상호작용.유아-교사관계.다중지능과 초등학교 적응 간의 관계. 유아교육연구, 26(3), 201-221.
  8. 최혜영(2004). 아동의 또래 상호작용과 교사신념 및 교사행동 간의 관계. 연세대학교 박사학위 청구논문.
  9. 최혜영.신혜영(2008). 아동 또래 놀이 행동척도(PIPPS)의 국내적용을 위한 타당화 연구. 아동학회지, 29(3), 303-318.
  10. 홍세화(2000). 구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국임상심리학회지, 19(1), 161-177.
  11. Coie, J. D. (1990). Toward a theory of peer rejection. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood. New York：Cambridge University Press.
  12. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood：Origins, consequences, and intervention (pp. 17-59). NY：Cambridge University Press.
  13. Fantuzzo, J. W., Coolahan, K., Mendez, J., McDermott & Sutton-Smith, B. (1998a). Contextually-relevant validation of peer play constructs with African American head start children：Penn Interactive Play Scale. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13(3), 411-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80048-9
  14. Fantuzzo, J. W., Sutton-Smith, B., Coolahan, K., Manz, P. H., Canning, S., & Dehnam, D. (1995). Assessment of preschool play interaction behavior in young low-income children：Penn Interactive Peer Play Scale. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10, 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2006(95)90028-4
  15. Fantuzzo, J. W., Mendez, J., & E. Tighe. (1998b). Parental Assessment of Peer Play：Development and Validation of the Parent Version of the Penn Interactive Play Scale. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13(4), 659-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80066-0
  16. Gurlanick, M. J. (1992). A hierarchical model for understanding children's peer-related social competence. In S. L. Odom, S. R. McConnell, & M. A. Evoy (Eds.), Social competence with disabilities; Issues and strategies for intervention (pp. 37-64). Baltimore：Paul H. Brooks.
  17. Hampton, V. R., & Fantuzzo, J. W. (2003). The validity of the Penn Interactive Peer Plqy Scale with urban, low-income kindergarten children. School Psychology Reviw, 32(1), 77-91.
  18. Howes, C., & Leslie, P. (1998). Continuity in children's relations with peers. Social Development, 98, 340-349.
  19. Milfort, R., & Greenfield, D. B. (2002). Teacher and observer ratings of head start children's social skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 581-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00190-4
  20. Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment : Are low-accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357-389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.102.3.357
  21. Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. (2001). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol.3)：Social emotional and personality development (6th ed., pp. 571-643). New York：John Wiley & Sons.
  22. Rubin, K. H., & Mills. R. S. (1988). The many faces of isolation in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 56, 916-924. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.916

Cited by

  1. The Effects of a Thematic Fantasy Play Program on Prosocial Behaviors and Peer Play Interaction of Young Children with Developmental Delays in an Inclusive Classroom vol.10, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14698/jkcce.2014.10.2.213
  2. Effects of Behavioral and Emotional Regulation on Preschool Children’s Peer Play Behavior: Focusing on Gender Differences vol.52, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2014.046
  3. Trajectories of Child Peer Interaction and Their Predictors: Longitudinal Analysis Using Latent Growth Modeling vol.37, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5723/kjcs.2016.37.6.145
  4. An Analysis of the Effects of Child-Peer Interaction on Three-Year-Old Children: Focusing on Moderating Effects of Child Gender and Mediating Effects of Teacher-Child Interaction vol.39, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5723/kjcs.2018.39.4.117