Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지

The Effect of Packing Method of Relining Material on the Flexural Strength of Denture Base Resin

첨상용 레진의 성형법이 의치상의 굴곡강도에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Min-Chul (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Yu-Lee (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 김민철 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김유리 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2011.02.10
  • Accepted : 2011.06.25
  • Published : 2011.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The study aimed at examining how different reline resins affect flexural strength and flexural modulus of denture base. A total of 80 specimens ($64{\times}10{\times}3.3$ mm, according to ISO 1567:1999) of heat-polymerized resin, 40 specimens for (Lucitone199(Dentsply Int., NewYork, USA), SR Ivocap(Ivoclar AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein)) respectively, were polymerized according to the manufacturer's instructions and divided into eight groups(n = 10). Control group specimens remained intact. Specimens in the other groups were abraded on both sides to 2 mm thickness, and were relined in 1.3 mm thickness with 3 types of resins (Lucitone199(Dentsply), SR Ivocap(Ivoclar), and Rebase II(Tokuyama Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan)). All specimens were preserved in distilled water at $37^{\circ}C$ for 50 hours, and then were subjected to flexural strength testing in a universal testing machine using 3-point loading. A crosshead speed of 5 mm/min was used, and the distance between the supports was 50 mm. Data analyses included one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA) and the Tukey Honestly Significant Difference test (p=.05). Both heat-polymerized resin groups and auto-polymerized resin groups showed statistically low flexural strength and flexural modulus than control groups. Specimens relined with Lucitone 199 showed significantly higher flexural strength and flexural modulus than those relined with SR-Ivocap. Specimens relined with auto-polymerized resin showed significantly lower flexural strength and flexural modulus than those relined with heat-polymerized resin. Relining with heat-polymerized resins showed superior mechanical properties to relining with an auto-polymerized resin. Relining with the same heat-polymerized resin as the denture base does not affect mechanical properties of a denture. Lucitone199 using a compression-mould technique resulted in the highest flexural strength.

의치상의 첨상에 사용하는 레진의 종류가 의치상의 굴곡강도와 굴곡계수에 미치는 영향을 비교하는데 있다. 국제표준규격 제 1567 호(ISO 1567:1999)를 참고로 2 가지의 의치상용 열중합레진(Lucitone199(Dentsply Int., NewYork, USA), SR-Ivocap(Ivoclar AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein))을 이용하여 길이 64 mm ${\times}$ 폭 50 mm ${\times}$ 두께 3.3 mm 의 시편을 제작하였다. 각각의 제작된 시편을 다시 두께 2.0 mm 로 규격화한 뒤 3 종류의 레진(Lucitone199 (Dentsply), SR-Ivocap(Ivoclar), Rebase II(Tokuyama Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan))으로 각각 1.3 mm 의 두께로 첨상을 하였다. 제작된 시편(n=10)을 증류수가 담긴 밀폐된 용기 내에 $37^{\circ}C$에서 50 시간 동안 보관하였다. 그 후 만능시험기를 이용하여 시편의 3 점 굴곡강도와 굴곡계수를 측정하였다. 지지대간의 거리는 50 mm, crosshead speed 는 5 mm/min 였다. 측정값은 One-way ANOVA 로 비교 분석하였고, Tukey test 를 이용하여 사후 검정하였다. 열중합형 레진과 자가중합형 레진으로 첨상한 군들은 모두 첨상을 시행하지 않은 대조군보다 통계적으로 유의하게 낮은 굴곡강도와 굴곡계수를 나타났다. 본래의 의치상용 레진의 종류와 무관하게 Lucitone199 을 이용해 첨상한 군이 SR-Ivocap 을 이용한 군보다 통계적으로 유의하게 높은 굴곡강도와 굴곡계수를 보였다. 자가중합형 레진을 이용한 군은 열중합형 레진을 이용한 군 보다 통계적으로 유의하게 낮은 굴곡강도와 굴곡계수를 보였다. 의치상의 첨상 시 자가중합형 레진 보다 열중합형 레진을 이용하는 것이 우수한 기계적 성질을 보였다. 열중합형 레진을 이용한 첨상 시 본래의 의치상과 같은 종류의 레진을 사용하는 것은 의치상의 기계적 성질에 영향을 미치지 않았으며 Lucitone199 를 이용한 가압주형법에서 가장 우수한 물성을 나타냈다.

Keywords

References

  1. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alvealar ridges in complete denture wearers: A mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent. 1972;27:120-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90188-6
  2. Bowman J.F. Relining and rebasing technique. Dent. Clinics of North America 1977;21:369-370.
  3. Boucher CO. The relining of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;30:521.
  4. Carl T. Ostrem. Relining complete dentures Original Research Article. J Prosthet Dent. 1961;11;2:204-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(61)90194-9
  5. Jumbelic R, Nassif J. General considerations prior to relining of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51;2:158-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90252-X
  6. Christensen F.T. Relining techniques for complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1971;26;4:373-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90168-5
  7. Boucher CO. The relining of complete dentures Original Research Article. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91;4:303-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00157-4
  8. Nassif J., Jumbelic R. Current concepts for relining complete dentures: A survey Original Research Article. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51;1:11-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(84)80093-1
  9. Arena C.A, Evans D.B, Hilton T.J. A comparison of bond strength among chairside hard reline materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70:126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90006-A
  10. Vallittu PK. Some factors affecting the transverse strength of repaired denture acrylic resin. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1996;4:7-9.
  11. Reis JM, Vergani CE, Pavarina AC, Giampaolo ET, Machado AL. Effect of relining, water storage and cyclic loading on the flexural strength of a denture base acrylic resin. J Dent. 2006 Aug;34(7): 420-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.10.001
  12. Takahashi Y, Kawaguchi M, Chai J. Flexural strength at the proportional limit of a denture base material relined with four different denture reline materials. Int J Prosthodont. 1997;10:508-512.
  13. Archadian N, Kawano F, Ohguri T, Ichikawa T, Matsumoto N. Flexural strength of rebased denture polymers. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27(8):690-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00552.x
  14. Pavarina AC, Neppelenbroek KH, Guinesi AS, Vergani CE, Machado AL, Giampaolo ET. Effect of microwave disinfection on the flexural strength of hard chairside reline resins. J Dent. 2005;33(9): 741-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.02.003
  15. Vallittu, P.K, Lassila, V.P. Lappalainen, R. Wetting the repair surface with methyl methacrylate affects the transverse strength of repaired heat-polymerized resin. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:639. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90297-6
  16. Leles CR, Machado AL, Vergani CE, Giampaolo ET, Pavarina AC. Bonding strength between a hard chairside reline resin and a denture base material as influenced by surface treatment. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:1153-1157. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00786.x
  17. Arima T, Murata H, Hamada T. Properties of highly cross-linked auto-polymerizing reline acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;73:55-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80273-2
  18. Patil SB, Naveen BH, Patil NP. Bonding acrylic teeth to acrylic resin denture bases: a review. Gerodontology. 2006 Sep;23(3):131-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2006.00129.x
  19. Bunch J, Johnson G.H, Brudvik J.S. Evaluation of hard direct reline resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1987; 57:512. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90027-8
  20. Craig RG. Restorative dental materials. 8th ed. St Luis: CV Mosbt;1989;509-559
  21. Arima T, Nakawa H. Composition and effect of denture base resin surface primers for reline acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 75: 457-462 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90044-X
  22. Wyatt CCL, Harrop TJ. A comparison of physical Characteristics of six hard direct reline materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55:343-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90117-4
  23. Cucci AL, Rached RN, Giampaolo ET, Vergani CE. Tensile bond strengths of hard chairside reline resins as influenced by water storage. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1999;26:631-34. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00428.x
  24. International Standard Organization (1999). ISO 1567: 1999(E). Dentistry-Denture Base polymer. Geneva: ISO.
  25. Weaver RE, Goebel WM. Reactions to acrylic resin dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43: 138-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90176-6
  26. De Clerk JP. Microwave polymerization of acrylic resins used in dental prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 1987; 57:650-658. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90353-2
  27. Phillips R.W. Skinners science of dental materials. WB Saunders Co.;1982:8th ed.:177-185
  28. Grant A. A. Distortion of gypsum casts following the polymerization of methyl methacrylate. J. Dent. Res. 1963;42:8-17.
  29. The Ivocap Denture system. 1985;San Marcos, Calif: Ivoclar(U.S.A.) Inc.
  30. Schmidt K.H. SR-Ivocap system and denture structure. Quinte. Int. 1976;4:29-32.