On the QoS Behavior of Self-Similar Traffic in a Converged ONU-BS Under Custom Queueing

  • Obele, Brownson Obaridoa (School of Information and Communications, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)) ;
  • Iftikhar, Mohsin (Computer Science Department, King Saud University) ;
  • Kang, Min-Ho (Electrical Engineering Department, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAlST))
  • Received : 2010.03.24
  • Accepted : 2010.10.28
  • Published : 2011.06.30

Abstract

A novel converged optical network unit (ONU)-base station (BS) architecture has been contemplated for next-generation optical-wireless networks. It has been demonstrated through high quality studies that data traffic carried by both wired and wireless networks exhibit self-similar and long range dependent characteristics; attributes that classical teletraffic theory based on simplistic Poisson models fail to capture. Therefore, in order to apprehend the proposed converged architecture and to reinforce the provisioning of tightly bound quality of service (QoS) parameters to end-users, we substantiate the analysis of the QoS behavior of the ONU-BS under self-similar and long range dependent traffic conditions using custom queuing which is a common queuing discipline. This paper extends our previous work on priority queuing and brings novelty in terms of presenting performance analysis of the converged ONU-BS under realistic traffic load conditions. Further, the presented analysis can be used as a network planning and optimization tool to select the most robust and appropriate queuing discipline for the ONU-BS relevant to the QoS requirements of different applications.

Keywords

References

  1. G. Shen, R. S. Thcker, and C. J. Chae, "Fixed mobile convergence architectures for broadband access: Integration of EPON and WiMAX," IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 44-50, Aug. 2007.
  2. B. O. Obele and M. H. Kang, "Fixed mobile convergence: A self-aware QoS architecture for converging WiMAX and GEPON access networks," in Proc. IEEE NGMAST, Wales, UK, Sept. 2008, pp. 411-418.
  3. Y. Luo, S. Yin, T. Wang, Y. Suemura, S. Nakamura, N. Ansari, and M. Cvijetic, "Qos-aware scheduling over hybrid optical wireless networks," in Proc. OFC/NFOEC, Mar. 2007, pp. 1-7.
  4. B. O. Obele, M. Iftikhar, S. Manipornsut, and M. H. Kang, "On the analysis of the behavior of self-similar traffic in a QoS-aware architecture for integrating WiMAX & GEPON," IEEE/OSA J. Optical Commun. Netw., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 259-273, Sept. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.1.000259
  5. W. Odom and M. J. Cavanaugh, Cisco DQOS Exam Certification Guide (IP Telephony Self-Study). Cisco Press, 2003.
  6. Configuring custom queuing. [Online]. Available: http://www.ciseo.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios 122/122cgcr/fqos_c/qcfcq.htm
  7. W. E. Leland, M. S. Taqqu, W. Willinger, and D. Wilson, "On the selfsimilar nature of ethernet traffic," IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-15, Feb. 1994. https://doi.org/10.1109/90.282603
  8. W. Willinger, M. S. Taqqu, and A. Erramilli, "A bibliographical guide to self-similar traffic and performance modeling for modern high-speed networks," Stochastic Netw.: Theory and Appli., pp. 339-366, 1996.
  9. W. Carey, "Internet traffic measurement," IEEE Internet Comput. Mag., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 70-74, Nov. /Dec. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1109/4236.968834
  10. M. E. Crovella and A. Bestavros, "Self-similarity in world wide web traffic: Evidence and possible causes," IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 835-846, Dec. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1109/90.650143
  11. M. Crovclla and A. Bestavros, "Explaining world wide web traffic self-similarity," Boston University, CS Dept, Boston, MA 02215, Tech. Rep. TR-95-015, Aug. 1995.
  12. M. Caglar, "A long-range dependent workload model for packet data traffic," in Proc. Mathematics of Operations Research, vol. 29, 2004, pp. 92-105.
  13. M. Iftikhar, "Quality of service management in IP networks with selfsimilar traffic input," Ph.D. dissertation submitted to the School of Information Technologies, University of Sidney, 2008.
  14. M. Iftikhar, T. Singh, B. Landfeldt, and M. Caglar, "Multiclass G/M/1 queuing system with self-similar input and non-preemptive priority," Elsevier J. Comput. Commun., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1012-1027, Mar. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2007.12.033
  15. M. Iftikhar, B. Landfeldt, and M. Caglar, "Traffic engineering and QoS control between wireless diffServ domains using PQ and LLQ," in Proc. ACM MobiWac, Greece, Oct. 2007, pp. 120-129.
  16. D. Gross, J. ShortIe, M. Fischer, and D. Masi, "Difficulties in simulating queues with Pareto service," in Proc. WSC, 2002.
  17. D. Kunth, The Art of Computer Programming, Semi Numerical Algorithms. vol. 2. 3rd ed., Addison-Wesley, Boston, pp. 232.
  18. K. Park and M. Crovella, "On the relationship between file sizes, transport protocols and self-similar network traffic," in Proc. Int. Conf. Network Protocols, Oct. 1996, pp. 171-180.
  19. R. Ritke, X. Hong, and M. Gerla, "Contradictory relationship between Hurst parameter and queueing performance (extended version)," Springer J. telecommun., vol. 16, no. 1-2, pp. 159-175, Jan. 2001.
  20. L. Kleinrock, Queuing Systems, Volume II: Computer Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  21. P. Ulanovs and E. Petersons, "Modeling methods of self-similar traffic for network performance evaluation," Scientific Proc. RTU, series 7, vol. 2, Telecom. and Electronics, pp. 40-49, 2002.
  22. M. W. Garrett and W. Willinger, "Analysis, modeling and generation of self-similar VBR video traffic," in Proc. ACM Comput. Commun. Rev., vol. 24, Oct. 1994, pp. 269-280.
  23. S. Kasahara, "Internet traffic modeling: A Markovian approach to self-similar traffic and prediction of loss probability for finite queues," IEICE Trans. Commun.: Special Issue on Internet Technol., vol. E84-B, no. 8, pp. 2134-2141, Ang. 2001.