한국응용곤충학회지 (Korean journal of applied entomology)

  • 제50권2호
  • /
  • Pages.97-105
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1225-0171(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-545X(eISSN)
한국응용곤충학회 (Korean Society of Applied Entomology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

멸종위기종 붉은점모시나비(Parnassius bremeri )의 메타개체군 구조와 이주

Metapopulation Structure and Movement of a Threatened Butterfly Parnassius bremeri (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in Korea

  • 김도성 (한국나비보전센터) ;
  • 박두상 (한국생명공학연구원) ;
  • 권용정 (경북대학교 응용생명과학부) ;
  • 서상재 (경북대학교 생태자원응용학부) ;
  • 김창환 (전북대학교 환경조경디자인학과) ;
  • 박성준 (국립환경과학원) ;
  • 김동혁 (경북대학교 생태자원응용학부) ;
  • 김진서 (경북대학교 생태자원응용학부) ;
  • 유혜미 (경북대학교 생태자원응용학부) ;
  • 황종석 (경북대학교 생태자원응용학부)
  • Kim, Do-Sung (Butterfly Conservation Center of Korea) ;
  • Park, Doo-Sang (Biological Resource Center, KRIBB) ;
  • Kwon, Yong-Jung (School of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Suh, Sang-Jae (School of Applied Ecological Resources, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Hwan (Dept. of Environment Landscape Architecture Design, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Seong-Joon (Envirnmental Research Complex) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Hyuk (School of Applied Ecological Resources, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Seo (School of Applied Ecological Resources, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Yu, Hye-Mi (School of Applied Ecological Resources, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Hwang, Jong-Seok (School of Applied Ecological Resources, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2011.03.29
  • 심사 : 2011.04.01
  • 발행 : 2011.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

메타개체군의 구조와 이주에 관한 이해는 종 보존을 위해서 필요하다. 본 연구는 붉은점모시나비 서식지에서 MRR 방법으로 나비의 이주패턴을 분석하고 패치연결성을 추정하였다. 그 결과 194(수컷: 137, 암컷: 57)개체가 포획 되었으며 이중 93 (수컷: 73, 암컷: 20)개체가 재포획되었다. 이주 분석에서 이입율은 23-150%, 이출율은 28-53%으로 나타났다. 패치면적과 이입 이출 개체수와의 회귀분석에서는 상관관계를 보이지 않았으며, 먹이식물 수와 이입 이출 개체수와의 회귀분석에서도 상관관계를 보이지 않았다. 그러나 이입 개체수와 패치간 거리와의 분석에서는 높은 상관관계를 보였다. 따라서 나비의 이주는 패치거리가 가까울수록 빈번하게 일어나고 있으나 패치의 면적이나 먹이식물 량과 관계가 없는 것으로 나타났다. 나비의 이주에서 암컷보다 수컷이 매우 활발한 것으로 나타났다. 패치의 위치에 따른 이주 패턴의 분석 결과 패치 네트워크상에서 중앙에 위치한 패치가 양쪽 끝에 위치한 개체군을 이어주는 역할을 하고 있으며 근접한 거리에 있는 패치들간 이주가 멀리 떨어진 패치에 비해 빈번한 이주가 일어나는 것을 보여주었다. 따라서 붉은점모시나비의 이주에 있어서 근거리에 위치한 패치들간 교류가 활발히 일어나고 있으며 패치와 패치를 이어주는 징검다리 역할을 하는 패치가 존재할 경우 교류가 더 활성화된다는 것을 제시하고 있다.

Understanding the metapopulation structure and movement of a species are required for conserving the species. In this paper, migration patterns and connectivity of patches of a threatened butterfly, Parnassius bremeri Bremer, were postulated using the mark-release-recapture (MRR) technique in a habitat located in the mid-southern region of the Korean peninsula. A total of 194 individuals were captured (137 males and 57 females) and, of them, 93 individuals (73 males and 20 females) were recaptured during the MRR experiment. The migration analysis showed 23-150% immigration and 28-53% emigration. There were high correlations between the migrating individuals and the distance between patches, but there was no correlation between migrating individuals and patch size or between migrating individuals and the number of host plants. Consequently, the migration of butterflies occurred frequently between closer patches, while patch size and quantity of the food plant had minor effects on migration behavior. Additionally, males migrated more frequently than females. Analysis of the migration patterns of P. bremeri showed that the central patch played an important role on linking patch groups and more frequent migrations were monitored between nearby patches than between the remote patches. This study suggested that active migrations take place between the neighboring multiple patches and these are accelerated if there is a stepping-stone patch between them.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Auckland, J.N., D.M. Debinski, and W.R. Clark. 2004. Survival, movement, and resource use of the butterfly Parnassius clodius. Ecol. Entomol. 29: 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0307-6946.2004.00581.x
  2. Baguette, M., S. Petit and F. Queva. 2000. Population spatial structure and migration of three butterfly species in the same habitat network: consequences for conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 100-108. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00478.x
  3. Bergman, K.-O. and J. Landin. 2002. Population structure and movements of a threatened butterfly (Lopinga achine) in a fragmented landscape in Sweden. Biol. Conserv. 108: 361-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00104-0
  4. Caughley, G. 1994. Directions in conservation biology. J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 215-244. https://doi.org/10.2307/5542
  5. Conradt, L., E.J. Bodswrth, T.J. Roper and C.D. Tomas. 2000. Non-random dispersal in the butterfly Maniola jurtina: implications for metapopulation models. Proc. Biol. Sci. 267: 1505-1510. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1171
  6. Ehrlich, P.R. 1984. The structure and dynamics of butterfly populations. pp. 25-40. In The biology of butterflies, eds. R.I. Vane-Wright and P.R. Ackery. 429p. Academic Press. London.
  7. Erhardt, A. and J.A. Thomas. 1991. Lepidoptera as indicators of changes in the semi-natural grasslands of lowland and upland Europe. pp. 213-236. In The Conservation of Insects and their Habitats, eds. Collins, N.M. and J.A. Thomas. 432p. Academic Press. London.
  8. Fred, M.S. and J.E. Brommer. 2003. Influence of habitat quality and patch size on occupancy and persistence in two populations of the Apollo butterfly (Parnassius Apollo). J. Insect Conserv. 7: 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025522603446
  9. Gorbach, V.V. and D.N. Kabanen. 2010. Spatial organization of the clouded Apollo population (Parnassius mnemosyne) in Onega Lake Basin. Entomol. Review 90: 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873810010021
  10. Haag, C.R., M. Saastamoinen, J.H. Marden and I. Hanski. 2005. A candidate locus for variation in dispersal rate in a butterfly metapopulation. Proc. Biol. Sci. 272: 2449-2456. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3235
  11. Hanski, I. 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J. Animal Ecol. 63: 151-162. https://doi.org/10.2307/5591
  12. Hanski, I., J. Alho and A. Moilanen. 2000. Estimating the parameters of survival and migration of individuals in metapopulations. Ecology 81: 239-251. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0239:ETPOSA]2.0.CO;2
  13. Hanski, I and M. Singer. 2001. Extinction-colonization dynamics and host-plant choice in butterfly metapopulations. Am. Nat. 158: 341-353. https://doi.org/10.1086/321985
  14. Hanski, I. and E. Meyke. 2005. Large-scale dynamics of the Glanville fritillary butterfly: landscape structure, population processes, and weather. Ann. Zool. Fennici 42: 379-395.
  15. Hunter, M.L. 2002. Fundamentals of conservation Biology. Blackwell Science, Malden, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
  16. Jolly, G.M. 1965. Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model. Biometrika 52: 225-247. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.1-2.225
  17. Kim D.S., Y.B. Cho and J.K. Koh. 1999. The factors of local disappearance and a plan of restoration for Parnassius bremeri form Okchon-gun, Korea. Korean J. Environ. 17: 469-479.
  18. Kindvall, O. and I. Ahlen. 1992. Geometrical factors and metapopulation dynamics of the bush cricket, Metriptera bicolor Philippi (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Conserv. Biol. 6: 520-529. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06040520.x
  19. Ko, M.S., J.S. Lee, C.H. Kim, S.S. Kim and K.T. Park. 2004. Distributional data and ecological characteristics of Parnassius bremeri Bremer in Korea. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 43: 7-14.
  20. Konvicka, M. and K. Tomas. 1999. Population structure, behaviour and selection of oviposition site of an endangered butterfly, Parnassius mnemosyne, in Litovelske Pomoravi, Czech Republic. J. Insect Conserv. 3: 211-223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009641618795
  21. Kuussaari, M., M. Singer and I. Hanski. 2000. Local specialization and landscape-level influence on host use in an herbivorous insect. Ecology 81: 2177-2187. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2177:LSALLI]2.0.CO;2
  22. Maes, D. and H. V. Dyck. 2001. Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (north Belgium): Europe's worst case scenario? Biol. Conserv. 99: 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00182-8
  23. Matter, S.F. and J. Roland. 2002. An experimental examination of the effects of habitat quality on the dispersal and local abundance of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus. Ecol. Entomol. 27: 308-316. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00407.x
  24. Moilanen, A. and M. Nieminen. 2002. Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Ecology 83: 1131-1145. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1131:SCMISE]2.0.CO;2
  25. Nowicki, P., M. Witek, P. Skorka, J. Settele and M. Woyciechowski. 2005. Population ecology of the endangered butterflies Maculinea teleinus and M. nausithous and the implications the conservation. Popul. Ecol. 47: 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-005-0222-3
  26. Petit, S., A. Moilanen, I. Ha nski and M. Baguette. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: movements between habitat patches. Oikos 92: 491-500. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.920310.x
  27. Roland, J., N. Keyghobadi and S. Fownes. 2000. Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: Effects of landscape and population size. Ecology 81: 1642-1653. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1642:APBDEO]2.0.CO;2
  28. Ross, J.A., S.F. Matter, and J. Roland. 2005. Edge avoidance and movement of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus in matrix and non-matrix habitat. Landscape Ecol. 20: 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-004-1010-8
  29. SAS-StatView 5.0.1. 1998. SAS institute Inc. second edition.
  30. Tabashnik, B.E. 1980. Population structure of Pierid butterflies. III. Pest population of Colias philodice eriphyle. Oecologia 47: 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346817
  31. Thomas, C.D. 2000. Dispersal and extinction in fragmented landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 267: 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.0978
  32. Thomas, C.D. and S. Harrison. 1992. Spatial dynamics of a patchily distributed butterfly species. J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 437-446. https://doi.org/10.2307/5334
  33. Välimaki P. and J. Itamies. 2003. Migration of the clouded Apollo butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne in a network of suitable habitats - effects of patch characteristics. Ecography 26: 679-691. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03551.x
  34. Wells, S.M., R.M. Pyle and N.M. Collins. 1983. The IUCN invertebrate Red Data Book.
  35. Wilcox, B.A. and D.D. Murphy. 1985. Conservation strategy: the effects of fragmentation on extinction. Am. Nat. 125: 879-887. https://doi.org/10.1086/284386

피인용 문헌

  1. Habitat distributional change of the large copper, Lycaena dispar (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), on the Korean Peninsula: Studies along the Geum River vol.17, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2014.01.006
  2. The Analysis and Conservation of Patch Network of Endangered Butterfly Parnassius bremeri(Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in Fragmented Landscapes vol.51, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2012.01.1.064
  3. Comparison of Butterfly Communities between Guryongryeong and Gojigkyeong of the Baekdudaegan Mountain Range and the Changes in Their Distribution vol.54, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2015.06.0.008
  4. Effects of Host plant, Nectar plant and Vegetation types on Butterfly Communities vol.51, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2012.08.0.023
  5. Supercooling capacity along with up-regulation of glycerol content in an overwintering butterfly, Parnassius bremeri vol.20, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2017.06.014