DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Distributional Characteristics and Improvements for Wildlife Protection Areas in South Korea

야생동·식물보호구역 분포 특성과 개선과제

  • Lee, Gwan-Gyu (Department of Landscape Architecture, Kangwon National University)
  • 이관규 (강원대학교 산림환경과학대학 조경학과)
  • Received : 2011.08.28
  • Accepted : 2011.09.21
  • Published : 2011.10.31

Abstract

Through the analyses of the distribution characteristics and management practices of the wildlife protection areas, this study intends to present basic data for improving the management of protected areas. 1) Based on the aggregate results of the protected areas, the average ratio of the metro-city and provincial areas to the designated protected areas was 1.49%; except for Chungcheongbuk-do (8.83%) and Gyeongsangnam-do (3.43%), most regions showed specified percentages of about 1%, whereby the analysis suggested that the designated protected areas were too small. 2) Considering the fact that most (86.16%) of the wildlife protection areas are in the regions that are of ecological nature level of grade 1, green nature level of grade 8 or better, and of legal conservation regions and districts, it was shown that these reserves are distributed in regions with excellent natural environmental conditions. 3) Designation of protected areas for the protection of wildlife and fish is deemed to be necessary. Although there are 588 wildlife & plant reserves, there are absolutely no designated areas for protecting plant and fish species. 4) Based on the results of an analysis of the current distribution by types, 92.47% of protected areas were concentrated in the mountains, 0.24% in the agricultural lands, and 7.29% distributed in the lakes/rivers/costal areas. 5) As major improvement projects, proposed were: advancement of management systems for protected areas, expanded designation of protected areas, overhaul of managed areas, designation of protected areas for the protection of wild plants and fish, need for management measures for private property and the surrounding areas, need to secure appropriate management personnel and collaboration, locally-adapted management, eco-information-based management, total management of protected areas, etc.

Keywords

References

  1. 박용하, 2006, 선진외국의 보호지역 관리기법 연구. 환경부 연구보고서.
  2. 야생동.식물보호법.
  3. 이관규, 노백호, 이현우, 2006, 야생동물 피해예방 시설 설치비 지원 및 피해보상 기준에 관한 연구, 환경부 보고서.
  4. 이관규, 노백호, 이현우, 이정환, 2007, 야생동.식물보호구역 지정 실무매뉴얼 및 관리지침 작성 연구. 환경부 보고서.
  5. 환경부 자연보전국, 2011, 자연환경보전 업무계획 및 주요 현안사항.
  6. 환경부 자연정책과, 2011, 보호지역 지정현황 내부 자료.
  7. 환경부 자연정책과, 2008, 야생동.식물보호구역 통계 내부자료.
  8. British Columbia, 2003, White Lake Protected Area Management Plan
  9. Canada, 1917, Migratory Birds Convention Act.
  10. Canada, 1973, Canada Wildlife Act.
  11. Canada, 2003, Species at Risk Act.
  12. Convention on Biological Diversity
  13. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Pillipin. NIPAS (National Intergrated Protected Areas System).
  14. English Nature, 1949, National Park and Access to the Country Act
  15. EU, 1979, EU Directive, Council Directive of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds(79/409/EEC)\
  16. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2011, Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, including Aichi Biodiversity Targets Living in Harmony with Nature.
  17. US Fish & Wildlife Service, 1997, National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act.
  18. US Fish & Wildlife Service, 2000, National Wildlife Refuge System Centennial Act
  19. US Fish & Wildlife Service, 2006, Comprehensive Conservation Plan.
  20. US Fish & Wildlife Service, 1996, National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act.
  21. 日本自然環境保全法
  22. 日本鳥獸保護法
  23. 日本鳥獸の保護及び狩獵の適正化に關する法律.