Application of UPOV Data for the Analysis of Genetic Variation in Rose Cultivars

  • Kim, Gi-Jun (Asiaseed Breeding Institute) ;
  • Song, Young-Ha (Division of Plant Biotechnology, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Gi, Gwang-Yeon (Horticultural Research Division, Jeonnam Agricultural Research & Extension Services) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Tae (National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Ja-Hyun (Division of Plant Biotechnology, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Han, Tae-Ho (Division of Plant Biotechnology, Chonnam National University)
  • Received : 2010.04.28
  • Accepted : 2011.04.22
  • Published : 2011.06.30

Abstract

The principal objective of this study was to estimate the availability of morphological data on the basis of the guidelines of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) with regard to the identification of the rose germplasm. The correlation of morphological traits and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) marker data among 44 rose cultivars was assessed via a mantel test. Thirty eight phenotypes were employed for morphological analysis. Sixteen primers were utilized for RAPD analysis, and these generated 225 polymorphic bands. The dendrogram based on the RAPD markersgrouped 44 rose cultivars according to their horticultural types. No significant correlation was observed between the morphological and RAPD marker data. We concluded that current UPOV traits could not be applied to study genetic variation. Further studies on morphological traits are required for the analysis of genetic variation among cultivars.

Keywords

References

  1. Babaei, A., S.R. Tabaei-Aghdaei, M. Khosh-Khui, R. Omidbaigi, M.R. Naghavi, G.D. Esselink, and M.J.M. Smulders. 2007. Microsatellite analysis of Damask rose (Rosa damascena Mill) accessions from various regions in Iran reveals multiple genotypes. BMC Plant Bio. 7:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-7-12
  2. Debener, T., C. Bartels, and L. Mattiesch. 1996. RAPD analysis of genetic variation between a group of rose cultivars and selected wild rose species. Mol. Breeding 2:321-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00437910
  3. Debener, T., C. Bartels, and W. Spethmann. 1997. Parentage analysis in interspecific crosses between rose species with RAPD markers. Gartenbauwissenschaft 62:180-184.
  4. Debener, T., M. Linde, and A. Dohm. 2004. The utilization of molecular tools for rose breeding and genetics. Acta Hort. 630:29-42.
  5. Diaby, M. and M.D. Casler. 2003. RAPD marker variation among smooth bromegrass cultivars. Crop Sci. 43:1538-1547. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.1538
  6. Esselink, G.D., M.J.M. Smulders, and B. Vosman. 2003. Identification of cut rose (Rosa hybrida) and rootstock varieties using robust sequence tagged microsatellite site markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106:277-286.
  7. Jan, C.H., D.H. Byrne, J. Manhart, and H. Wilson. 1999. Rose germplasm analysis with RAPD markers. Hort. Sci. 34:341-345.
  8. Kim, G.J., J.K. Choi, G.Y. Gi, K.B. Lim, and T.H. Han. 2006. Selection of RAPD primers for efficient fingerprinting in roses. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 24:253-257.
  9. Kim, G.J., G.Y. Gi, J.H. Lee, Y.H. Joung, Y.H. Song, and T.H. Han. 2008. Application of RAPD marker for the detection of parentage from known rose pedigrees. Hort. Environ. Biotechnol. 49:253-257.
  10. Kwon, Y.S., J.M. Lee, G.B. Yi, S.I. Yi, K.M. Kim, E.H. Soh, K.M. Bae, E.K. Park, I.H. Song, and B.D. Kim. 2005. Use of SSR markers to complement tests of distinctiveness, uniformity, and stability (DUS) of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) varieties. Mol. Cells 19:428-435.
  11. Lefebvre, V., B. Goffinet, J.C. Chauvet, B. Caromel, P. Signoret, R. Brand, and A. Palloix. 2001. Evaluation of genetic distances between pepper inbred lines for cultivar protection purposes: comparison of AFLP, RAPD, and phenotypic data. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102:741-750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051705
  12. Maric, S., S. Bolariċ, J. Martincic, I. Pejic, and V. Kozumplik. 2004. Genetic diversity of hexaploid wheat cultivars estimated by RAPD markers, morphological traits and coefficients of parentage. Plant Breeding 123:366-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2004.00956.x
  13. Matinez, L., P. Cavagnaro, R. Masuelli, and J. Rodriguez. 2003. Evaluation of diversity among argentine grapevine (Vitisvinifera L.) varieties using morphological data and AFLP markers. Elec. J. Biotech. 6:241-250.
  14. Millan, T., F. Osuna, S. Cobos, A.M. Torres, and J.I. Cubero. 1995. Using RAPDs to study phylogenetic relationships in Rosa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92:273-277.
  15. Mohapatra, A. and G.R. Rout. 2005. Identification and analysis of genetic variation among rose cultivars using random amplified polymorphic DNA. J. Phys. Sci. 60:611-617.
  16. Nei, M. and W.H. Li. 1979.Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:5269-5273. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.10.5269
  17. Rajapakse, S., D.H. Byrne, L. Zhang, N. Anderson, K. Arumuganathan, and R.E. Ballard. 2001. Two genetic linkage maps of tetraploid roses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103:575-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00002912
  18. Roberts, A.V., T. Deberner, and S. Gudin. 2003. Encyclopedia of rose science 1. Elsevier Academic Press. Oxford.
  19. Rohlf, F.J. 1998. NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, Version 2.0. Exeter Publications, New York.
  20. Torres, A.M., T. Millian, and J.I. Cubero. 1993. Identifying rose cultivars using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Hort. Sci. 28:333-334.
  21. Vosman, B., D. Visser, J.R. Van der Voort, M.J.M. Smulders, and F. Van Eeuwijk. 2004. The establishment of 'essential derivation' among rose varieties, using AFLP. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109:1718-1725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1809-3
  22. Zlesak, D.C. 2006. Rose: Rosa ${\times}$ hybrida, p. 695-738. In: N.O. Anderson (ed.). Flower breeding and genetics: Issues, challenges and opportunities for the 21st century. Springer, Dordrecht.